2 Tuesday w/analysis

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
Yesterday 0 0 0 0.00 Units
Last 30 Days 42 50 0 -2.76 Units
Season To Date (Since March 2011) 91 110 1 -12.72 Units

All games are listed pitchers unless stated otherwise.


HOME TEAM IN CAPS

Boston +115 over TAMPA BAY
At some point the Red Sox are going to lose another game but as long as a tag is being offered on them, they’re almost an automatic play. Boston has averaged 8.2 RPG during its current nine-game winning streak, and is hitting .313/.380/.517 during June. TB’s offense has been struggling, barely averaging three runs per game during June, batting .238/.289/.343. The Red Sox just punished both the Yanks and Blue Jays and outscored Toronto in that three-game set 35-6. Tim Wakefield can go out there knowing that every time he gives up a run the offense will score two or three. Every Red Sox pitcher can relax and just throw their game. The other side of that coin is the pitchers that have to face Boston. That’s daunting enough but becomes even more so when your offense isn’t producing and that’s precisely the situation James Shields is in. Additionally, Shields is laboring at the moment, having surrendered 21 hits and 14 runs over his last three starts in 18 IP. One of those starts was in Seattle and in that game the Mariners went yard on Shields four times. After getting his clocked clean a season ago, Shields’ confidence could also be in question. Red Sox plus anything right now is as good as it gets. Play: Boston +115 (Risking 2 units).

Kansas City +153 over OAKLAND
The A’s really don’t warrant being better than a 7½-5 favorite over anyone and that includes the Royals and their rookie pitcher. For one, KC has won three of its last four and they scored 14 runs over their last two games. This is a team that is loaded with outstanding talent in the minors and they’re slowly bringing these guys up. They recently promoted Eric Hosmer, Mike Moustakas and Greg Holland and all three are making a difference. Danny Duffy is another outstanding prospect but is getting himself into trouble at this level. He’s made five starts and if he blows this one he’s likely going back down. Duffy has solid stuff but he’s uncharacteristically walking far too many guys. One of his strengths in the minors was his impeccable command but he’s left that down there. Duffy is able to hold his above average velocity (90-97 mph) deep into games and his deceptive delivery and arm slot keep hitters off-guard. He’s overthrowing but five games into his career and a date with the A’s can fix that real fast and he’s most certainly worth a look at this price. Trevor Cahill started the year 6-0 and is now 6-4. The A’s have lost the last six games he’s started and until recently he’s had superior results backed by mediocre skills. A low hit rate of 29% and a high strand rate of 80% has aided him greatly in keeping his ERA to 3.18. As hit % and strand % regress, Cahill’s ERA is going to rise much closer to his xERA of 3.80. Lastly, Oakland has one win in its last 13 games. Need we say more? Play: Kansas City +153 (Risking 2 units).
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
2,364
Tokens
Agreed, that Oakland/KC line is pretty absurd regardless of what happens. One of my favorite angles all year has been fading Oakland as a big chalk. Laying off here, but do like it. Certainly wouldn't argue with Boston at plus money or your points on Shields other than to mention that, while it was against the light hitting Angels, Shields was tons better than his final stat line in his last. He cruised through 7 without allowing a run with 8 K's. Then he gave up a pair of singles and walked the third batter after getting ahead 1-2...he was clearly tired at that point and Maddon was slow to pull the hook (because he was so good all night). Lefty reliever comes in to face Abreu and the second pitch is promptly laced to the gap plating all three base-runners. He's also usually better at home. I agree though, with some question marks surrounding him and this white hot Red Sox lineup coming to town, even with Wakefield pitching I don't really feel like Tampa should be favored here.

GL Sher
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
howdy...Personally think that both the Rays and the Royals are excellent choices for Series plays (+155 and -110 respectively)

Oakland is next to last in MLB for paying at the window and until that moderates it sure seems wacky to back them at any kind of significant lay.....

Best to us all for a great Tuesday and week ahead
 

RX Senior
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Messages
6,282
Tokens
If the Rays are going to score runs it'd be vs Wakefield.....lean towards Rays First 5 here. gl sir.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
Personally D-Bowe, I think there's a lot better options than betting against Boston these days, whether it's 1, 5 or 9 frames. Thanks everyone for the good lucks!!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
12,475
Tokens
The Sawx ,,,,
16 Wins and 2 Losses this season On the Road vs teams w/ winning records
23 Wins and 5 Losses this season vs teams w/ winning records they know how to play up to the opponent ............

Gonna tail you lieutenant for a couple ...........hope all is well North of the boarder .....
D
 

New member
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
1,618
Tokens
You're tendency to overlook a mediocre pitcher's struggles while highlighting a decent pitcher's most recent poor fortune is why you're currently in negative units. Duffy may well end up being a good pitcher but Cahill is at a major advantage at this point. If a line at first glance looks absurdly high, ask yourself why, and what it is you're missing.

Personally I think the line is where it ought to be. The A's finally get to return home after a brutal road schedule and a day off with their ace now taking mound. A's are the play for me.

GL with the Boston play though, can't ever argue with taking plus money on that team.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
2,564
Tokens
Additionally, Rays had to fly from Baltimore on Sunday to play a make-up game in Detroit. They used most of their bullpen in that game and then had a flight back to Tampa. Boston had Monday off.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
2,564
Tokens
You're tendency to overlook a mediocre pitcher's struggles while highlighting a decent pitcher's most recent poor fortune is why you're currently in negative units. Duffy may well end up being a good pitcher but Cahill is at a major advantage at this point. If a line at first glance looks absurdly high, ask yourself why, and what it is you're missing.

Personally I think the line is where it ought to be. The A's finally get to return home after a brutal road schedule and a day off with their ace now taking mound. A's are the play for me.

GL with the Boston play though, can't ever argue with taking plus money on that team.
I can tell you that the lines on Ubaldo Jimenez have been absurdly high and it's because of last year's reputation. I've seen every one of his starts and at some point you have to realize that he is just being overvalued. When a pitcher hasn't won in his last six starts it makes very little sense to bet against that trend.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Would love to see a game at that Coors Field

Will be in Denver Oct 6-9, so if they can get that far, might get my shot this fall
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,201
Tokens
You're tendency to overlook a mediocre pitcher's struggles while highlighting a decent pitcher's most recent poor fortune is why you're currently in negative units. Duffy may well end up being a good pitcher but Cahill is at a major advantage at this point. If a line at first glance looks absurdly high, ask yourself why, and what it is you're missing.

Personally I think the line is where it ought to be. The A's finally get to return home after a brutal road schedule and a day off with their ace now taking mound. A's are the play for me.

GL with the Boston play though, can't ever argue with taking plus money on that team.

With all due respect, that's not why. I'm in negative units because of some horrible luck. Twice, I've had three runs lead in the ninth with 0 on and 2 out and lost them both. The other night I had Rockies -1½ +144 over Dodgers. Rocks had 6-0 lead going to the ninth and I lose it easy. 5 times I've lost games in the ninth with 2 run leads. If half of those games hit, I'm plus units. Just three game difference is all that it takes. In other words, if you just take those three games with two, three run leads and one 4 run lead, instead of losing 6 units, I win about 8 and would be up 2 units. Nonetheless, O never complain about that because it's the nature of the beast and hopefully it all equals out over time. So, no , it's not because I took Duffy over that stiff Cahill.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
1,618
Tokens
Fair enough, sherwood, just seems to be something I noticed with your plays.

And, tonight anyway, it looks like I'll be enjoying the taste of my own foot as Cahill struggles.

Just trying to help out. You're one of the few I follow and read every bit of because I respect your opinion.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,706
Messages
13,453,666
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com