T.O. won't pay full child support

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
ATLANTA (AP)

The mother of Terrell Owens' child says the NFL star has refused to pay the full $5,000 a month in child support he owes.


Melanie Paige Smith filed court papers June 20 in an Atlanta court seeking to hold the player in contempt.


Attorney Randall Kessler said Owens has refused to pay the full $5,000 for June. He says in court records that Owens' financial advisers have informed Smith that the athlete has decided to no longer pay the full amount.


Owens, a free agent, is recovering from knee surgery and can't sign with a team until the NFL lockout is resolved. Owens' agent, Drew Rosenhaus, did not immediately return messages Wednesday seeking comment.


Smith's attorneys say Owens is a resident of Fulton County, which encompasses most of Atlanta.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,877
Tokens
He shouldn't pay the 5k per month - no fucking kid needs this much money - sets the worst example for these leeches to intentionally get knocked up so they think they'll get money - fuck her
 

Where Taconite Is Just A Low Grade Ore
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
8,490
Tokens
TO is a punk MF, Da Judge says 5K asshole pay up!!! Fuck him & his Jew bastard agent. They're both liars!!
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
He shouldn't pay the 5k per month - no fucking kid needs this much money - sets the worst example for these leeches to intentionally get knocked up so they think they'll get money - fuck her

Yeah, because TO needs 50K per month to be TO. Fuck him, pay up.

And, because society needs another poor, fatherless black child.
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Child support is generally based on income.

Considering TO's income is now much lower with the lockout, seems reasonable that he can go back to court and have the amount recalculated.

I suspect the kid can get by on 2-3k/ month.
 

I never ever got beat-I just run out of Money
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
1,076
Tokens
I think the judge should come up with a $$$ figure for what it cost to feed,clothes,general supplies, to raise a child for a month, and set that $$$ amount that the mother gets to raise the child. And have the other amount put in a trust fund the child or children get when they turn the age of 21,25,30 what ever the age is set at. For $5000.00 a month this bitch don't even have to get a job when she is getting $60,000.00 a year tax free, and if she gets re-married this is still a nice monthly bonus she gets to keep until the child turns 18 yrs. old unless the child goes to college then she is still hitting the lottery. So for easy math:

Example:

Judge figures $1200.00 a month to raise child for food,clothes, general supplies.

Judges makes the father deposit $3800.00 a month in a trust fund. So by the age of 21 the child has $79,800.00 + interest, to do what ever the child wants to do with it. In case the mother forgot it is the child's money not hers.

This way the money grubbing bitches don't get to live off their children's child support tax free, she can get a job. Child support is for the kid not here trifling ass .

I think this is the way it should be done the father is suppose to take care of the child only. He is not responsible for the mother.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
638
Tokens
I think the judge should come up with a $$$ figure for what it cost to feed,clothes,general supplies, to raise a child for a month, and set that $$$ amount that the mother gets to raise the child. And have the other amount put in a trust fund the child or children get when they turn the age of 21,25,30 what ever the age is set at. For $5000.00 a month this bitch don't even have to get a job when she is getting $60,000.00 a year tax free, and if she gets re-married this is still a nice monthly bonus she gets to keep until the child turns 18 yrs. old unless the child goes to college then she is still hitting the lottery. So for easy math:

Example:

Judge figures $1200.00 a month to raise child for food,clothes, general supplies.

Judges makes the father deposit $3800.00 a month in a trust fund. So by the age of 21 the child has $79,800.00 + interest, to do what ever the child wants to do with it. In case the mother forgot it is the child's money not hers.

This way the money grubbing bitches don't get to live off their children's child support tax free, she can get a job. Child support is for the kid not here trifling ass .

I think this is the way it should be done the father is suppose to take care of the child only. He is not responsible for the mother.

I like your thought process here, but your math is very messed up. $3800 a month for 21 years is $957,600 + interest.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
Nobody forced him to have a child. He did, he owes child support, pay it.
 

I never ever got beat-I just run out of Money
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
1,076
Tokens
thank you on the correction I multiplied $3800 x 12....LOL..... I've been up for about 30 hrs. right now not thinking correctly.................
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
I think the judge should come up with a $$$ figure for what it cost to feed,clothes,general supplies, to raise a child for a month, and set that $$$ amount that the mother gets to raise the child. And have the other amount put in a trust fund the child or children get when they turn the age of 21,25,30 what ever the age is set at. For $5000.00 a month this bitch don't even have to get a job when she is getting $60,000.00 a year tax free, and if she gets re-married this is still a nice monthly bonus she gets to keep until the child turns 18 yrs. old unless the child goes to college then she is still hitting the lottery. So for easy math:

Example:

Judge figures $1200.00 a month to raise child for food,clothes, general supplies.

Judges makes the father deposit $3800.00 a month in a trust fund. So by the age of 21 the child has $79,800.00 + interest, to do what ever the child wants to do with it. In case the mother forgot it is the child's money not hers.

This way the money grubbing bitches don't get to live off their children's child support tax free, she can get a job. Child support is for the kid not here trifling ass .

I think this is the way it should be done the father is suppose to take care of the child only. He is not responsible for the mother.

This is actually a great idea.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,906
Messages
13,439,464
Members
99,345
Latest member
08winlink
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com