US Federal Government: Marijuana has No Accepted Medical Use and Should be Classified Highly Dangerous

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,787
Tokens
[ I have mixed feelings on this one... ]


U.S. decrees that marijuana has no accepted medical use

The decision by the DEA comes almost nine years after medical marijuana supporters asked the government to reclassify cannabis to take into account a growing body of research that shows its effectiveness in treating certain diseases.




63114261.jpg
Potting soil for marijuana is displayed at the weGrow garden center in Phoenix. California-based weGrow is seeking to capitalize on Arizona's newly enacted medical marijuana law. (Joshua Lott, Reuters / June 3, 2011)


By John Hoeffel, Los Angeles Times July 9, 2011

Marijuana has been approved by California, many other states and the nation's capital to treat a range of illnesses, but in a decision announced Friday the federal government ruled that it has no accepted medical use and should remain classified as a highly dangerous drug like heroin.

The decision comes almost nine years after medical marijuana supporters asked the government to reclassify cannabis to take into account a growing body of worldwide research that shows its effectiveness in treating certain diseases, such as glaucoma and multiple sclerosis.





Advocates for the medical use of the drug criticized the ruling but were elated that the Obama administration has finally acted, which allows them to appeal to the federal courts. The decision to deny the request was made by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and comes less than two months after advocates asked the U.S. Court of Appeals to force the administration to respond to their petition.

"We have foiled the government's strategy of delay, and we can now go head-to-head on the merits," said Joe Elford, the chief counsel for Americans for Safe Access and the lead attorney on the lawsuit.

Elford said he was not surprised by the decision, which comes after the Obama administration announced it would not tolerate large-scale commercial marijuana cultivation. "It is clearly motivated by a political decision that is anti-marijuana," he said. He noted that studies demonstrate pot has beneficial effects, including appetite stimulation for people undergoing chemotherapy. "One of the things people say about marijuana is that it gives you the munchies and the truth is that it does, and for some people that's a very positive thing."

In a June 21 letter to the organizations that filed the petition, DEA Administrator Michele M. Leonhart said she rejected the request because marijuana "has a high potential for abuse," "has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States" and "lacks accepted safety for use under medical supervision." The letter and 37 pages of supporting documents were published Friday in the Federal Register.

This is the third time that petitions to reclassify marijuana have been spurned. The first was filed in 1972 and denied 17 years later. The second was filed in 1995 and denied six years later.Both decisions were appealed, but the courts sided with the federal government.

The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis filed its petition in October 2002. In 2004, the DEA asked the Department of Health and Human Services to review the science. The department recommended in 2006 that marijuana remain classified as a dangerous drug. Four and a half years then elapsed before the current administration issued a final denial.

"The regulatory process is just a time-consuming one that usually takes years to go through," said Barbara Carreno, a spokeswoman for the Drug Enforcement Administration.

The DEA's decision comes as researchers continue to identify beneficial effects. Dr. Igor Grant, a neuropsychiatrist who is the director of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research at UC San Diego, said state-supported clinical trials show that marijuana helps with neuropathic pain and muscle spasticity. He said the federal government's position discourages scientists from pursuing research needed to test the drug's medical effectiveness. "We're trapped in kind of a vicious cycle here," he said. "It's always a danger if the government acts on certain kinds of persuasions or beliefs rather than evidence."

Popular opinion has also swung behind medical marijuana. Americans overwhelmingly support it in national polls. When the petition was filed, eight states had approved medical marijuana. Now 16 states and the District of Columbia have done so. In 2009, the American Medical Assn. urged the government to review its classification of marijuana "with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods."

When Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act in 1970, it listed marijuana as a Schedule I drug, the most restrictive of five categories. But some federal officials have questioned that decision. In 1972, a commission recommended that marijuana be decriminalized. And in 1988, a DEA administrative law judge concluded that "marijuana has been accepted as capable of relieving the distress of great numbers of very ill people." The National Cancer Institute, which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services, notes that marijuana may help with nausea, loss of appetite, pain and insomnia.

Nonetheless, the DEA concluded that marijuana has no accepted medical use, Leonhart wrote in her letter, because its chemistry is not known and adequate studies have not been done on its usefulness or safety. "At this time," she said, "the known risks of marijuana use have not been shown to be outweighed by specific benefits in well-controlled clinical trials that scientifically evaluate safety and efficacy."
 

SHANKAPOTOMUS !!!!
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
3,492
Tokens
Should be legal everywhere. Alcohol is 100x worse for your body!

Ok..... let the debate begin!

@)
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
It serves no medical purpose. With that said it should not be illegal.

And here is the problem with me.

Im a free thinker that does not follow any political parties lines.

Im way right in some area's and way left in others.

There is not a party in the world that I agree with even 75% of the time except for SOME libertarians. But even them I have huge issues with in some area's.


So here I am earlier today with my very strong prolife beliefs in Sooners thread making friends with the repubs and pissing off the liberals.

Now I come to this thread to defend freedom to smoke weed, now I look to get bashed by the repubs that was in my corner in the other thread, and praised by the ones bashing me in the abortion thread.

Why cant everyone be a free thinker?
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
This is Big News because now the tens of millions of Americans who elect to responsibly consume marijuana will be stuck with doing what they've already been doing.

That is, using marijuana whenever they want to and paying no attention whatsoever to what the U.S. federal government thinks about it.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
4,440
Tokens
Agree with BM. Legalize it and tax it - new source of revenue for the government and a new industry that will need to hire a lot of people. What isn't to like about this?
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
Agree with BM. Legalize it and tax it - new source of revenue for the government and a new industry that will need to hire a lot of people. What isn't to like about this?

We could export it as well. Could be a new cash crop...
 

New member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
4,440
Tokens
Also imagine how much money could be put towards our deficit if we decriminalize MJ...the amount we spend on jailing and prosecuting these "criminals" alone must be absurd.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
My list of things that should be illegal is very short
 

Pour your misery down on me
Joined
May 20, 2004
Messages
4,361
Tokens
If you were going thru chemotherapy for cancer , hepatitis c treatment or aids treatments you would pray you could get some medical MJ for the nausea and to give you some kind of an appetite .
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Agree with BM. Legalize it and tax it - new source of revenue for the government and a new industry that will need to hire a lot of people. What isn't to like about this?

This line of argument has merit, but sadly and unfortunately it's greatly diminished over the past 20 to 25 yrs as the Prohibition Industrial Complex creates even MORE revenue, MORE taxes and MORE jobs than most any scenario we can create for a legal, regulated marijuana marketplace

Businesses and industries which enjoy increased revenues, tax payments and employment thanks to 21st century Prohibition include, but are not limited to:

1) Alcohol industry
2) Pharmaceutical Industry

Both of the above would clearly not benefit from increased legal access to marijuana by American consumers

3) Criminal Justice System
a) Police and other law enforcement agencies
b) Criminal Court System
c) Prison and Jails (federal, state and local)

Police and other law enforcement agencies are paid literally tens of billions of dollars per year by the federal government in return for their direct and assertive involvement with the "War on Drugs". Every single arrest increases the flow of that revenue. Last year, over 800,000 Americans were arrested on marijuana-related charges, with about 90% of those being for simple possession. This figure is approximately 1.5 times the number of Americans arrested on violent crime charges during the same period.

The "War on Marijuana Users" delivers over 30% of the daily traffic to America's criminal court systems nationwide

The ancillary industries of jails, prisons and "supervision" (probationees and parolees) employ at least 1 million full time jobs nationwide with about that many more in tertiary level businesses like:

4) Urine (and other body fluid) Testing companies

Urine and other body part (hair etc) "testing" companies exceeded the billion dollar per year mark at least a decade ago and their business flow (no pun intended) is founded on the search for marijuana use with all other illicit substances an extremely distant second place.

5) The existing Illegal Drug Dealers, Cartels etal

No other industry in the previous four would suffer as much economic destruction as would those who currently make the frontline profits from marijuana sold under a system of Prohibition. This leads to a resonable deduction that those people most strident about perpetuating 21st century Prohibition are those with the closest financial ties to the Illegal Drug Cartels and other Organized Crime who currently control upwards of 80% in the North American marijuana economy.

=========
There are certainly several other types of businesses and affluent industries which in the short term enjoy increased revenues and profits from Prohibition than they would otherwise, but the above list of five is pretty much the prevailing obstacle to any hope that someday soon the U.S. federal government will amend it's 41 yr old absurd and frankly socially destructive stance regarding all things marijuana.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
We could export it as well. Could be a new cash crop...

Not unreasonable, but rather unlikely given that were (when?) the U.S. government finally abandons their policy of absolute Prohibition on a legal, sensibly regulated marijuana market, the majority of other nations would follow suit and people withint their respective countries could more easily produce and commercially distribute quality marijuana products.

Best case would likely be akin to what we now see in most U.S. markets with alcohol.

That is - 95%+ of products are manufactured within the USA and a much smaller percentage is imported from other countries.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
Barman. Was thinking we would have the edge in exporting.

Kind of like how everyone loved US cigs... Marlboro's were all over Europe and Asia...
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Barman. Was thinking we would have the edge in exporting.

Kind of like how everyone loved US cigs... Marlboro's were all over Europe and Asia...

Well that was in large part because American tobacco producers and distributors were on the (literal) front end of the Industrial Revolution and within a couple decades, they were far ahead of any other producers in the world.

Add in the same industries being on the front end of expansive radio, television and print advertising which began in the U.S. and then expanded internationally and we can further understand how American brands took a strong place in other countries.

OTOH, marijuana has been grown for literal centuries worldwide and until the late 1990s, there was nowhere outside of Holland and a few other relatively isolated places that permitted at least a quasi-legal production and commercial distribution.

Any advantage that U.S. suppliers might have today, IMHO only (smile) would be short lived as it's quite simple to cultivate high quality weed, especially if the most dangerous obstacle (Prohibition law enforcement) has been removed.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,066
Tokens
if only they would look at the ingredients of the crap we all buy at the supermarkets with such care.................................
 

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
14,873
Tokens
The thing i dont understand is in some states where it's de-criminalized but they get you on paraphanalia.

I'm reading a 1998 wrestling observer news letter and ther's a story about pro wrestlers Rob Van Dam and Sabu traveling down an Ohio freeway when they're pulled over by police. One wrestler was in possesion of 6 grams of weed , and the other wrestler was in possesion of an empty but previously used pipe.

B/C of Ohio laws on possesion of less than a 1/2 ounce the wrestler with the weed was issued a citation (similar to a traffic ticket) while the one with the pipe was arrested , booked in jail , had to bail out , and later meet a court date.

Now i know i'm dumb for asking this , but why is the pipe worse than the pot ?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
7,718
Tokens
It serves no medical purpose

False.

It relieves vision problems with patients who suffer glaucoma, aids in chemotherapy, and overall improves the quality of life for those in pain and suffering. That is as legitimate of a medical reason as they come.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
4,209
Tokens
Smoke and fly don't drink and drive!

Professionals need to do documented research with the idea of overdosing and marijuana. I don't know or think anyone can but with the idea of marijuana being a medical prescription will bring questions.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,637
Messages
13,453,167
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com