Bet Record: http://go.sharpbettracker.com/vwavs
YTD: 0-0
Units Won: 0
Hey y'all,
Trying something new here and fading my buddy who seems to be underperforming in his bets to the point where it may be statistically significant (hence the username 'antiloyd' at sharpbettracker).
He's got an average ROI of -9% through a lot of bets, with average odds taken at -164. So theoretically, he'd need a 62% winning % to breakeven, but he's at 55.5% instead. (here is his record: http://go.sharpbettracker.com/kuipn)
I think this is a worthwhile experiment to pursue, so here we go. Will be doing $100 units and keep track of my record here: http://go.sharpbettracker.com/vwavs
First up are today's games:
Diamondbacks (Kennedy) 100 122
Athletics (Cahill) 100 -113
Cubs (Zambrano) 100 128
Red Sox (Lackey) 100 158
Will always be risking $100, even for games where I am paying juice. I should warn y'all, I don't have too much experience with baseball, so tail with caution.
YTD: 0-0
Units Won: 0
Hey y'all,
Trying something new here and fading my buddy who seems to be underperforming in his bets to the point where it may be statistically significant (hence the username 'antiloyd' at sharpbettracker).
He's got an average ROI of -9% through a lot of bets, with average odds taken at -164. So theoretically, he'd need a 62% winning % to breakeven, but he's at 55.5% instead. (here is his record: http://go.sharpbettracker.com/kuipn)
I think this is a worthwhile experiment to pursue, so here we go. Will be doing $100 units and keep track of my record here: http://go.sharpbettracker.com/vwavs
First up are today's games:
Diamondbacks (Kennedy) 100 122
Athletics (Cahill) 100 -113
Cubs (Zambrano) 100 128
Red Sox (Lackey) 100 158
Will always be risking $100, even for games where I am paying juice. I should warn y'all, I don't have too much experience with baseball, so tail with caution.
