Cesars Palace paying UTah

Railbird · Sep 11, 2011

According to Todd Furman, senior race and sportsbook analyst for Caesars Entertainment, his sportsbook won’t recognize the change made by the Pac-12 office.

“We graded the bet at 17-14,” Fuhrman said. “We dont recognize overturned results. Every book can operate how they choose. However, they should have it addressed in their house rules.”

jwblue · Sep 11, 2011

I guess they had more USC money.

Railbird · Sep 11, 2011

long rule of 1st Ap result official. young bookies need to make rules. If your book says Vegas rules apply they need to pay out Utah.

kingofalldegens · Sep 11, 2011

how could not all vegas casinos rule this way?? After game was over I'm sure everyone cashed there Utah tickets are they going to go hunt these people down?? Then pay out the USC tickets to the degens that held on to them after the game was over..

cutacrossshorty · Sep 11, 2011

I've had a couple of dialogues with my (offshore) book. They initially graded using 17-14 and then re-graded using 23-14 a few hours later. Their rules state that they don't recognize overturned decisions. However, in my discussions, they continue to claim this was a misreported score and not an overturned decision. I believe they're interpretation is completely wrong.

sharky99 · Sep 11, 2011

+9 should have been a push but got paid from stations also

Railbird · Sep 11, 2011

cut across shorty said:
I've had a couple of dialogues with my (offshore) book. They initially graded using 17-14 and then re-graded using 23-14 a few hours later. Their rules state that they don't recognize overturned decisions. However, in my discussions, they continue to claim this was a misreported score and not an overturned decision. I believe they're interpretation is completely wrong.

Not a misreported score. USC athletic department called the Pac 12 to get the overrule.

kidman232 · Sep 11, 2011

ive been reading where they say the issue with that flag is, the new rule for celebration applies to players active during the play, so since it was players from the sideline rushing onto the field and not any of the active 11 taunting or what not, that the penalty was suppose to be a dead ball unsportsmanlike penalty as opposed to the new rule that can negate a td

Akillies · Sep 11, 2011

cut across shorty said:
I've had a couple of dialogues with my (offshore) book. They initially graded using 17-14 and then re-graded using 23-14 a few hours later. Their rules state that they don't recognize overturned decisions. However, in my discussions, they continue to claim this was a misreported score and not an overturned decision. I believe they're interpretation is completely wrong.

of course you are right, but since its their book they interpret the rules to benefit them. the situation in vegas is the reason they have the rule 'no re-grades'. Did anyone cash a usc ticket?