Early Values For Super Bowl XLVII

Search

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,168
Tokens
Early values for Super Bowl XLVII

Chad Millman
ESPN INSIDER
in.gif


2012 look-ahead package:

Millman: Early Super Bowl XLVII values | Sprow: How Manning shifts the odds
numberFire: Projecting 2012 playoffs
Before "the drop" and "the catch" and "the phantom-D-on-the-touchdown" and "the proposal" and "the Gronk dancing shirtless" and all the other moments that made Super Bowl XLVI iconic, there was this small hint from a handicapper that the Giants were, at the least, on someone's radar: "I had them ranked one slot higher than the Jets at the end of last season, third-best performing team in the NFL (my order was Chargers, Steelers, Giants, Jets, Packers). They were the second-best offense, seventh-best defense. And when I ran my projected wins model for this year, they finished with the fifth-best record. Their only problem was INTs, but if they tighten things up …"

That was The Sports Boss, in a column I wrote about NFL futures last July, naming the 18-1 New York Giants as one of his best values on the preseason board. Kudos to you, Sports Boss, for being so prescient. Who cares if he also liked the New Orleans Saints (15-1), Minnesota Vikings (35-1) and New York Jets (14-1)? He had the right team at a good price and now, with the year over, he looks like he knew what he was talking about.

Futures are such an interesting bet because, when a team like the Giants wins, fans everywhere start thinking, "Oh man, the books must have gotten killed because such a long shot paid off." The truth is, not so much. Sure, they had to pay off a decent amount of bets at longish odds. But this year, think of how much that was balanced out by action on the Denver Broncos, Green Bay Packers, New England Patriots, Jets, Pittsburgh Steelers and every other team in the league. Books only have to pay out on one team; they get to collect on all the rest.




This year, thanks to labor peace and tranquility, NFL futures were posted by the Las Vegas Hotel (formerly the Las Vegas Hilton) with confidence the Monday before the conference title games. "By now," Ed Salmons, one of the LVH bookmakers, told me, "every team has some form of action."




So, to the questions on every bettor's mind: Which teams are the best values for Super Bowl XLVII, and which futures have already been hit hardest?

The first team to get hit at the LVH was the San Francisco 49ers, who were posted at 20-1 to win next year's Super Bowl. The bet? $500. That's $10,000 in liability on that bet alone, excluding any other bets that have been taken, but it's not enough to make the LVH move its number on San Fran yet. In fact, the Niners have been one of the teams that has received the most action in the past few weeks, and the number remains at 20-1. The Pats, at 7-1, are up there in bet totals with the Niners, but their number hasn't moved, either.




In fact, the biggest movers so far have been the Giants, from 20-1 to 15-1 and the Houston Texans, who opened at 15-1 and are now 12-1. (Going in the opposite direction are the Philadelphia Eagles, from 12-1 to 15-1, the Broncos from 50-1 to 60-1 and the Buffalo Bills, from 50-1 to 100-1.)

No one should be surprised by the action on the Texans. From now until kickoff on Sept. 6, they will be the choice of every sharp, square and closeted gambler for future value. I guarantee that this will be the one season win total bookmakers have the hardest time making, like the Detroit Lions last season, because so many people will have an opinion on this team. When I asked the Sports Boss for his early Super Bowl XLVII values -- because why shouldn't lightning strike twice? -- this is the rundown he gave me:
hou.gif

Texans 15-1: "I had them at No. 1 in my performance ratings on the full regular season, even after Matt Schaub went down they hung on. Obviously that shows just how well they were playing when he was under center, as they were on pace to be the best team in the five years I have been running these numbers. They need a healthy Schaub and Andre Johnson to play 16 and look out for a few more tweaks to that roster -- although they were an extremely well-rounded team as no area really stands out as a weakness. Their weakest unit was the No. 9 passing offense, but that is on the full season."




<hr style="width: 50%;">​




car.gif
Panthers 40-1: "I had them at No. 14 in my numbers, with a very weak defense more than offsetting the fourth-ranked offense. The offense will only continue to improve with Cam Newton and a solid rushing attack -- but they do need a lot of help personnel wise on defense. Tough division will hurt as well, but I do expect them to be better than Atlanta next season."




<hr style="width: 50%;">​




dal.gif
Cowboys 25-1: "I had them at No. 7 in my ratings, with about the same performance offensively and defensively. The real weakness was pass defense ranking, they were 20th or worse in every key pass defense stat. That caused their offense some grief as their rushing numbers weren't great. They will not have an easy schedule, but they did have five losses this year by four or less, or in overtime."

<hr style="width: 50%;">​




nyj.gif
Jets 20-1: "I had them No. 12 overall. They faced a tough schedule this year and that will lighten next year. I think this year being humbled, and the fact the Giants won the Super Bowl will work in their favor. So will replacing Brian Schottenheimer with Tony Sparano as the offensive coordinator. He will run the ball often and well, getting them back to how they have won in the past."

<hr style="width: 50%;">​




So, here's the wild card everyone is asking about: How does Peyton Manning play into this? RJ Bell of pregame.com pointed out on Twitter that the Cal-Neva sports book was offering odds on where Peyton would sign. The Dolphins, Redskins, Colts and Jets were the leading contenders. And yet, those teams' future numbers hadn't really moved. The Dolphins are still hanging out in the 50-1 range. The Redskins are lingering at 100-1. And the Colts are only at 40-1.

Why? Because bookmakers won't move on air for futures; they just aren't that scared. If you have a hunch, take a shot.

There will still be 31 losers at the end of the season.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,168
Tokens
How Peyton Manning shifts the odds

Want a good value prop bet? Look at these eight destinations for No. 18

By Chris Sprow
ESPN INSIDER
in.gif



<center>2012 look-ahead package:

Millman: Early Super Bowl XLVII values | Sprow: How Manning shifts the odds numberFire: Projecting 2012 playoffs </center>


On Monday, when I checked in with Jay Kornegay, who runs the book at the Las Vegas Hotel (formerly the Las Vegas Hilton), I was shocked. Where Peyton Manning might end up if and when he's released by the Colts isn't reflected in next year's posted Super Bowl odds. "We haven't moved anything … yet," he emailed.

That means no little bump for the Washington Redskins, or a nudge for the Miami Dolphins. Nothing. The action may be light seven months before kickoff, but I figured even the scent of rumors regarding where Manning might land could move some lines in the same way the hint of mad cow disease affects grain futures. The Redskins are currently 100-1, based on posted 20 percent odds they get Manning; couldn't that dip closer to 70-1 on rumors alone? So far: no. Books just won't budge on futures without something solid. Not yet, at least.

But this is good news for you. Manning might be the single greatest potential odds-shifting free agent in the league's history. He's the ultimate value prop, to the point where an equal play on every suitor might make sense. R.J. Bell of Pregame.com checked around with some sharps and told me Brett Favre signing with Minnesota may have pushed the Vikings' SB odds from about 30-1 to 15-1 -- and that was Favre coming off a pretty bad one-year run with the Jets. (And those Vikes were an INT from the Super Bowl.) Indy's poor performance this season is a testament to Manning's value.

So let's consider the futures field now and how dramatically Peyton could shift the odds and make any of these teams a good value prop bet. These go in order of teams that would be impacted the most. Simulations courtesy of AccuScore; odds via the LVH. Updated odds? Those are all me.




<hr style="width: 50%;">​




ari.gif
Arizona Cardinals | Current 2013 SB odds: 50-1 | Win projection: 7.0




Kevin Kolb has a $10 million cap number next season. Larry Fitzgerald is at a hair over $20 million. Bottom line: Arizona would have to creatively shoehorn, or perhaps reshuffle, the compensation for Fitz. But Manning makes Arizona the favorite in the NFC West by any projection you can find.




Win jump with Manning: 10.7 (plus-3.7) | Updated odds: 14-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
was.gif

Washington Redskins | 2013 SB odds: 100-1 | Win projection: 4.6




If that win projection depresses you, Skins fans, remember that it's with your current QB situation, The BeckRex Effect, which isn't even a good band name. The fit for Peyton makes a lot of sense, and he would look great in the system (think Houston's), but the presence of Eli Manning in the same division could lessen the appeal. That said, the Skins could be the most aggressive financially. As a value prop, it's a 4-to-1 jump in odds alone.

Win jump: 8.1 (plus-3.5) | Updated odds: 25-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
mia.gif

Miami Dolphins | 2013 SB odds: 50-1 | Win projection: 7.4




Manning makes a lot of sense in Miami, diminished only by the fact that so does Matt Flynn, given Joe Philbin's presence. Miami has improved their blocking, can run the ball, and also have a nice trio of targets in the passing game, all nice draws. The win jump projection is significant and makes the unlucky Dolphins of this past season virtual playoff locks next season. Want a 15-1 team at 50-1?




Win jump: 10.5 (plus-3.1) | Updated odds: 15-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
nyj.gif

New York Jets | 2013 SB odds: 20-1 | Win projection: 7.7




Odds he lands here? Small. That said, it'll remain interesting as long as Tom Moore's on the payroll -- Manning has never had another offensive coordinator as an NFL quarterback. Considering the Jets were the 29th most efficient passing game in 2011, if Manning wanted to come there, it'd be something to consider. And remember, it wouldn't be the first time general manager Mike Tannenbaum made this kind of move.




Win jump: 10.2 (plus-2.5) | Updated odds: 9-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
cle.gif

Cleveland Browns | 2013 SB odds: 100-1 | Win projection: 5.3




From what we hear, the Browns are more likely to have Robert Griffin III taking snaps than Manning next season, but they're included because of the QB questions. The win jump is only this low because of the rough AFC North schedule. Remember that new offensive coordinator Brad Childress has been down this road before with Favre -- more than once, in fact.




Win jump: 7.8 (plus-2.5) | Updated odds: 35-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
sea.gif

Seattle Seahawks | 2013 SB odds: 60-1 | Win projection: 7.3




The Vikings once went after Favre to avoid a season of Tarvaris Jackson. They went 12-4. Seattle is a well-constructed team, save for the large question mark behind center.




Win jump: 9.7 (plus-2.4) | Updated odds: 18-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
sfo.gif

San Francisco 49ers | 2013 SB odds: 20-1 | Win projection: 9.6




Hold on, 49ers fans. Before you gripe about the current win projection total, please know that every model in the world (even the human model) sees regression for San Fran unless it improves as a team, because its plus-28 turnover margin was not only historically good, but will be impossible to repeat. Of the six teams that were at or better than that margin in history, none improved their win totals in the next season. No way around it: Manning makes San Francisco better and is just as much a bridge to your QB of the future as the incumbent is.




Win jump: 11.5 (plus-1.9) | Updated odds: 8-1




<hr style="width: 50%;">​
kan.gif

Kansas City Chiefs | 2013 SB odds: 50-1 | Win projection: 6.8




In some ways, K.C. quietly makes a lot of sense. Matt Cassel's cap hit is down to a hair over $5 million for next season, so the Chiefs have the capability to be aggressive, and they're in a division that is up for grabs. They should be improved in terms of personnel, getting three of their best players back from injury. Certainly a good value prop if the SB odds are still at 50-1 an hour before Manning signs.




Win jump: 8.5 (plus-1.8) | Updated odds: 16-1
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,591
Messages
13,452,740
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com