Red Eye ??? tiger or the field tomorrow ??

5teamparlay · Mar 24, 2012

?????

Tiger is 38 of 4 when leading after 54..

basesAREloaded · Mar 25, 2012

Arnold Palmer Invitational: To Win Tournament (player must start 4th rd)

Sun 3/25Will T. Woods Win API?10:30 AM

41 Yes-127
42 No+115

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No+115

5teamparlay · Mar 25, 2012

Has won 38 of 40 when in the lead after 54...

HarryCaray · Mar 25, 2012

My local has

Tiger -300
Field +220

Field is pretty tempting here...

5teamparlay · Mar 25, 2012

Something wins 19 of 20 times... Hmmm. Lay -127. Has been lay -1900 historically, I'll take a shot on Tiger...

HarryCaray · Mar 25, 2012

Not that it really matters that much...but he's 48/52.

Edit...NM you are talking outright lead and I am talking at least share.

REDEYE · Mar 25, 2012

I think slightly under even money is ok to bet Tiger. if some other top players were on this leaderboard, I would take the field...but odds would be better for Tiger too.. no bet for me... As much as I knock Tiger, I am knocking myself for not betting Tiger before tournament began...Think I saw +775.... I predicted his next win would be Bayhill, but 2013, but didn't realizer this field would be this weak.....

5teamparlay · Mar 25, 2012

Agree certain courses favor him, Bay Hill for 0ne----

as well as Augusta--- give him 30 more shots at Augusta he will win at least 1.....

5teamparlay · Mar 25, 2012

Think I saw +775

Tough to touch...

Due to the injuries....

wabashwonders · Mar 25, 2012

RED EYE said:
I think slightly under even money is ok to bet Tiger. if some other top players were on this leaderboard, I would take the field...but odds would be better for Tiger too.. no bet for me... As much as I knock Tiger, I am knocking myself for not betting Tiger before tournament began...Think I saw +775.... I predicted his next win would be Bayhill, but 2013, but didn't realizer this field would be this weak.....

Why do you keep calling the field weak? Just because a few top players don't play, that makes it a weak field? 20 of the top 25 on the fed ex standings are playing this week. 7 of the top 10 on ryder cup standings are in the field. 3 of the top 10 on European list are playing. That means probably half of the players who will play at the Ryder Cup are playing this week. And yet, you call it a weak field. Shows how much you know about golf...

REDEYE · Mar 25, 2012

wabashwonders said:
Why do you keep calling the field weak? Just because a few top players don't play, that makes it a weak field? 20 of the top 25 on the fed ex standings are playing this week. 7 of the top 10 on ryder cup standings are in the field. 3 of the top 10 on European list are playing. That means probably half of the players who will play at the Ryder Cup are playing this week. And yet, you call it a weak field. Shows how much you know about golf...

actually it shows more on what you don't know about golf WashBoard ! Rory, Westwood, Donald, Kaymer, Kuchar, Day, Swartzel, Scott, D Johnson are not playing ! Case closed

REDEYE · Mar 25, 2012

RED EYE said:
actually it shows more on what you don't know about golf WashBoard ! Rory, Westwood, Donald, Kaymer, Kuchar, Day, Swartzel, Scott, D Johnson are not playing ! Case closed

Bradley is not playing either this week and he is argubally one of the best players of the year so far

wabashwonders · Mar 25, 2012

RED EYE said:
actually it shows more on what you don't know about golf WashBoard ! Rory, Westwood, Donald, Kaymer, Kuchar, Day, Swartzel, Scott, D Johnson are not playing ! Case closed

You are a real fucking idiot. So, just because its not a "Majors" type field that makes it a weak field. According to you, if all the best players in the world are not playing its a weak field. Like I said, proves how little you know about golf....

REDEYE · Mar 25, 2012

wabashwonders said:
You are a real fucking idiot. So, just because its not a "Majors" type field that makes it a weak field. According to you, if all the best players in the world are not playing its a weak field. Like I said, proves how little you know about golf....

I'm sure there is a strength of field stat on some golf website that can decide who the fucking idiot is. No way this tournament with this field is not in the lower 3rd %.. How could it be ? 9 ouut of top 11 are sitting it out.. You most likely won't see that the rest of the year.. . now go clean the dribble off your chin...

taylor13 · Mar 25, 2012

Enough about the field strength. It doesn't matter who the hell is playing this week, tiger and gmac would more than likely still be in the final group. They are playing great golf and if you can't recognize that, then you have some serious problems. get over it

wabashwonders · Mar 25, 2012

RED EYE said:
I'm sure there is a strength of field stat on some golf website that can decide who the fucking idiot is. No way this tournament with this field is not in the lower 3rd %.. How could it be ? 9 ouut of top 11 are sitting it out.. You most likely won't see that the rest of the year.. . now go clean the dribble off your chin...

I guess this week the world rankings fits your agenda to use when determining who is good and who isn't. I can never tell with you when those mean something and when they don't. I would be willing to bet that you would never walk up to Arnold Palmer and tell him his tournament this week had a weak field.

Let me ask you this, if the players you mentioned were playing this week but Tiger, Rose, Mickelson, Watson, Watney, Mahan, Simpson, Haas, and McDowell were not playing, would this still be a weak field? Just want to understand how you determine the strength of field...

REDEYE · Mar 25, 2012

taylor13 said:
Enough about the field strength. It doesn't matter who the hell is playing this week, tiger and gmac would more than likely still be in the final group. They are playing great golf and if you can't recognize that, then you have some serious problems. get over it

yea I'm sure if the top players in the world were playing , they would be trailing the Els, Wi's, and Poulters of the world. Nice try bro ! Even though the field is weak, Tiger is still playing good, no doubt, and deserves the win if he finishes...

wabashwonders · Mar 25, 2012

taylor13 said:
Enough about the field strength. It doesn't matter who the hell is playing this week, tiger and gmac would more than likely still be in the final group. They are playing great golf and if you can't recognize that, then you have some serious problems. get over it

Oh, King Taylor has spoken so I guess we are not allowed to discuss this anymore. Sorry. I won't voice my opinion anymore since its not worth shit but yours is...

REDEYE · Mar 25, 2012

wabashwonders said:
I guess this week the world rankings fits your agenda to use when determining who is good and who isn't. I can never tell with you when those mean something and when they don't. I would be willing to bet that you would never walk up to Arnold Palmer and tell him his tournament this week had a weak field.

Let me ask you this, if the players you mentioned were playing this week but Tiger, Rose, Mickelson, Watson, Watney, Mahan, Simpson, Haas, and McDowell were not playing, would this still be a weak field? Just want to understand how you determine the strength of field...

if the players I mentioned were playing instead of the ones you just posted, field would be stronger..Can't believe you can call me an idiot and even ask that !!How can you even compare the two groups ? Like I said, just check the stats somewhere..

taylor13 · Mar 25, 2012

RED EYE said:
yea I'm sure if the top players in the world were playing , they would be trailing the Els, Wi's, and Poulters of the world. Nice try bro ! Even though the field is weak, Tiger is still playing good, no doubt, and deserves the win if he finishes...

Wi and Els are what 7 shots back? Yea, good try bro!! And, actually yes, Els has been playing well lately I guess you don't follow as close as you claim too. They were all trailing ernie last week too, and then he collapsed on 17 and 18...

Don't be a sore loser, you were wrong!!!! Get over it