Strong Plays
Washington -133 (to win 5 units) Love the pitching match up here, Smardjiza moving from the BP to the starting Rotation, against a proven quality guy in Zimmerman. Also the cub BP isnt good. Get the brooms out washington sweeps.
Juice Plays:
San Francisco -137 (to win 3 units) Matt Cain is about as consitant of a right hander as you'll find.
that might be it for today. Gl All!
Washington -133 (to win 5 units) Love the pitching match up here, Smardjiza moving from the BP to the starting Rotation, against a proven quality guy in Zimmerman. Also the cub BP isnt good. Get the brooms out washington sweeps.
Juice Plays:
San Francisco -137 (to win 3 units) Matt Cain is about as consitant of a right hander as you'll find.
that might be it for today. Gl All!
thanks guys.
also playing Terriblecappers chase system today for anyone interested. I only play Sides in his system. ( I am not counting this towards my play as I am only playing it cuz of his system.)
im 3-0 +3 units so far using it
LA Angels -175 -- to win 1 unit. ( I am not counting this towards my play as I am only playing it cuz of his system.)
also playing Terriblecappers chase system today for anyone interested. I only play Sides in his system. ( I am not counting this towards my play as I am only playing it cuz of his system.)
im 3-0 +3 units so far using it
LA Angels -175 -- to win 1 unit. ( I am not counting this towards my play as I am only playing it cuz of his system.)
Noticed you had a couple big favorites on saturday. Just curious if you have any limits as to how high of a chalk you'll play. Have you ever gone through a large quantity of your selections and sorted them out by results according to the price offered? In other words, are you more profitable in certain categories than others, such as dogs, small chalks, midsize chalks or large chalks. Although I've never formally quantified it, I almost never play a fav over -150. When you see a big chalk, it's easy to almost automatically assume they SHOULD win by the mere fact of being so heavily favored.
As a side note, I'm not especially a baseball fan except for somehow having become a Kansas City fan. They're close to being a good team, but with their past history you want them to actually prove it. Their big question mark is the starting pitching. Maybe I'm prejudiced, but I saw from late last year that they seem to have potential above and beyond the pure numbers to be at least average. If the starters can just be average, they should have a winning season. Thanks for all you do.
As a side note, I'm not especially a baseball fan except for somehow having become a Kansas City fan. They're close to being a good team, but with their past history you want them to actually prove it. Their big question mark is the starting pitching. Maybe I'm prejudiced, but I saw from late last year that they seem to have potential above and beyond the pure numbers to be at least average. If the starters can just be average, they should have a winning season. Thanks for all you do.
not really any limits on how high I play, I dont think id play anything higher than like -220 however.
I havent gone through and checked out what my best money range was. just liked the pitching matchups against the teams -175+ yesterday, just didnt work out.
Also Agree about KC, they have some good sticks, pretty good bullpen, they need there Starting pitching to step up, which they have so far, even in the first game they lost.
