Wonder What Happened Her?

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
I was just watching "Larry" on the History Channel, and he was taking a tour of the Pentagon. He was being escorted by a security team and was led into a room with hundreds of monitors. According to the head of security...."they have cameras EVERYWHERE!"

So my question is...how come we've never seen any pictures of the jet crashing into the Pentagon on 9-11? After all, it would dispel all of these conspiracy theories that it was a missile rather than a jet plane that crashed into the Pentagon. You'd think the Gov't would want to clear this up. The only pictures I've ever seen was from a security camera across the street from another buildings camera and it is so blurry you can't distinguish much.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
I was just watching "Larry" on the History Channel, and he was taking a tour of the Pentagon. He was being escorted by a security team and was led into a room with hundreds of monitors. According to the head of security...."they have cameras EVERYWHERE!"

So my question is...how come we've never seen any pictures of the jet crashing into the Pentagon on 9-11? After all, it would dispel all of these conspiracy theories that it was a missile rather than a jet plane that crashed into the Pentagon. You'd think the Gov't would want to clear this up. The only pictures I've ever seen was from a security camera across the street from another buildings camera and it is so blurry you can't distinguish much.

They don't want to show that the Pentagon can be penetrated or vulnerable. That is why you never hear anything about it.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
  • Why were FBI agents immediately confiscating all video evidence of the impact around the Pentagon within moments of the attack and why have we not seen any of these video's except 5 grainy frames from a security camera?
  • Why does an analysis of Flight 77's Flight Data Recorder show the plane at 480 feet adjusted altitude a second before impact when it supposedly hit and knocked down five light poles?
  • If Hani Hanjour was incompetent at flying a single engine prop plane, then how are we to believe he maneuvered a commercial airliner, making a 270 deg turn at 400 mph all while dropping 7,000 feet in two minutes and hitting the Pentagon inches above the lawn? Many experienced pilots say with luck it would take several tries to accomplish such a feat.
  • The 9/11 Commission Report states that the flight path taken by Flight 77 was on the south side of the Citgo station. This directly contradicts the flight path from the Flight Data Recorder that was released by the NTSB. This data clearly shows that the path of the plane was not only on the north side of the Citigo station, but was no where near the light poles that were allegedly hit and knocked down by flight 77.
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
  • Why were FBI agents immediately confiscating all video evidence of the impact around the Pentagon within moments of the attack and why have we not seen any of these video's except 5 grainy frames from a security camera?
  • Why does an analysis of Flight 77's Flight Data Recorder show the plane at 480 feet adjusted altitude a second before impact when it supposedly hit and knocked down five light poles?
  • If Hani Hanjour was incompetent at flying a single engine prop plane, then how are we to believe he maneuvered a commercial airliner, making a 270 deg turn at 400 mph all while dropping 7,000 feet in two minutes and hitting the Pentagon inches above the lawn? Many experienced pilots say with luck it would take several tries to accomplish such a feat.
  • The 9/11 Commission Report states that the flight path taken by Flight 77 was on the south side of the Citgo station. This directly contradicts the flight path from the Flight Data Recorder that was released by the NTSB. This data clearly shows that the path of the plane was not only on the north side of the Citigo station, but was no where near the light poles that were allegedly hit and knocked down by flight 77.

So where is the plane?
 

Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
982
Tokens
I was just watching "Larry" on the History Channel, and he was taking a tour of the Pentagon. He was being escorted by a security team and was led into a room with hundreds of monitors. According to the head of security...."they have cameras EVERYWHERE!"

So my question is...how come we've never seen any pictures of the jet crashing into the Pentagon on 9-11? After all, it would dispel all of these conspiracy theories that it was a missile rather than a jet plane that crashed into the Pentagon. You'd think the Gov't would want to clear this up. The only pictures I've ever seen was from a security camera across the street from another buildings camera and it is so blurry you can't distinguish much.
Kooks will never be satisfied, the govt doesn't need to clear anything up, it's pretty clear.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
24,536
Tokens
The plane alledgedly disintergrated except for one part. That in itself is pretty hard to believe.

think he meant, if u believe it was a missle, what happened to the original plane and its passengers ie govt released gas on the plane, landed it at some millitary base and killed all on board etc etc
 

Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
982
Tokens
think he meant, if u believe it was a missle, what happened to the original plane and its passengers ie govt released gas on the plane, landed it at some millitary base and killed all on board etc etc
I'm pretty sure it's a big cover up, in fact, I dont think 911 even happened, the whole thing is one giant illusion, the towers still stand but is being masked by a giant hologram, and the sad thing is they had to kill not only the people on the planes, but the 3000 who they said were in the towers.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
I'm not saying they killed anyone on the plane, but let's face it, if you're going to kill 3000, what's another 50-60?

Another thing I don't understand, is how they used cell phones up in the air? I realize that some of the calls were with those airplane phones, but others claimed that they used their cell phones to call loved ones before they died. I've flown enough to know you just don't get any reception up in the air unless you are using those air phones.
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
I'm not saying they killed anyone on the plane, but let's face it, if you're going to kill 3000, what's another 50-60?

Another thing I don't understand, is how they used cell phones up in the air? I realize that some of the calls were with those airplane phones, but others claimed that they used their cell phones to call loved ones before they died. I've flown enough to know you just don't get any reception up in the air unless you are using those air phones.

Well, you are the one citing the flight recorder's data as to the location of the plane, so you tell me where the plane is. Where does the black box say as to where the plane is?
 

New member
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
1,860
Tokens
I'm not saying they killed anyone on the plane, but let's face it, if you're going to kill 3000, what's another 50-60?

Another thing I don't understand, is how they used cell phones up in the air? I realize that some of the calls were with those airplane phones, but others claimed that they used their cell phones to call loved ones before they died. I've flown enough to know you just don't get any reception up in the air unless you are using those air phones.

thats not true at all. I've flown on a private plane before and we were all using our cellphones to text and make calls. even when your on a commercial flights it won't make a difference. talk to a flight attendant or pilot at a bar some time, they'll tell you that using the internet or phone on a plane doesn't affect the instruments, they just don't feel like telling everyone to use them.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
2,131
Tokens
My experience is that cell phones have reception until you reach a certain altitude and once you get above that altitude, you no longer have reception. That's just my personal experience looking at my phone on various flights.

And I agree with seanjohn that it has basically been proven that cell phones have no bearing whatsoever on flight instruments. However, the ban is still in place just because. Guess the airlines would rather be too safe than the opposite.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
So why were the only planes flying after 9-11 were planes that were picking up members of the Bin Laden family? Like Lee Harvey Oswald, Bin Laden was the immediate "scapegoat' after 9-11. He probably had nothing to do with 9-11 at all! With all our satellite technology, which could pick up a flea farting, we could never see where that 6'5" mfer was hiding! We knew where he was all along. If he did get killed..which I doubt....why weren't there any photos shown? They had plenty of pictures of Saddam Husein being hung! Doesn't that seem strange to you?
 

New member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
2,127
Tokens
So why were the only planes flying after 9-11 were planes that were picking up members of the Bin Laden family? Like Lee Harvey Oswald, Bin Laden was the immediate "scapegoat' after 9-11. He probably had nothing to do with 9-11 at all! With all our satellite technology, which could pick up a flea farting, we could never see where that 6'5" mfer was hiding! We knew where he was all along. If he did get killed..which I doubt....why weren't there any photos shown? They had plenty of pictures of Saddam Husein being hung! Doesn't that seem strange to you?


Are you serious with this?????
 

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
7,718
Tokens
I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist (however reading and learning all I can about said theories IS very fascinating and fun) but I do believe our government KNEW that 9/11 was going to happen. No one can tell me it doesn't make SENSE (Arguing that we didn't know it was going to happen is one thing, but anyone who says this is completely out-of-the-question is a fool). Nothing bans a country behind a President more than a national tragedy. If 9/11 never occured, Bush would never have had a second term and we never would have had this war for oil, errr, terror, sorry. I like to believe we didn't "allow" this to happen for what the people in charge at the time may have considered "for the greater good."

I also find the conspiracy theories about the moon landing extremely entertaining as well because again, I can at least see where they are coming from.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
images
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,770
Messages
13,438,857
Members
99,338
Latest member
chaicoca816
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com