The Cat's MLB Over/Under Bets & Detailed Writeups - May 31, 2012 - YTD: 137-135-12

Search
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
2012 MLB O/U Record: 137-135-12, -$932
2011 MLB O/U Record: 366-270-42, +$1,104


Alright, today is a day I feel good about, which usually foreshadows a good performance. Only three games on the slate (An absolute rarity, by the way. Don’t recall a day having such few games in 2011 aside from the first couple of days of the year), which made me nervous initially, because it’s possible you are then forcing bets, since there’s such little action on the slate that you feel obligated to find at least one game. Instead, I was relaxed and had a good natural vibe on two of the three games (Surprisingly, the one game I DID NOT have a large feel for was the one involving the guy I’ve been perfect with all year and my favorite pitcher in all of baseball since 2009 - BUD NORRIS). That said, here’s my card, which I envision being a positive evening for The Cat…


Detroit Tigers @ Boston Red Sox (BestBet) - $95 for $90
Max Scherzer vs Josh Beckett
UNDER 9

Interesting conclusion to this, so far, all overs (Law of Averages?) four-game series between the Tigers and the Red Sox, or as most would sum up, the two most underachieving teams in the American League (The Royals being closely behind them). It’s a matchup between two guys who have showed ace-caliber stuff several times in the past, yet have also showed significant vulnerability in the past in getting hit around. The true question is, can we get both of these guys in their near top form in this Thursday night MLB Network showdown?

Luckily, both guys seemingly have to be confident heading into this affair, given their current grooves, especially Max Scherzer. In case you missed it, the Tigers’right-hander struck out 15 a week and a half ago, before sitting down 9 more via the strikeout in his last start in Minnesota, and overall, has mostly bounced back from his horrific start in which he was carrying a 2-3 record with a 6.26 ERA. He’s always had the potential ever since his beginning days in Arizona,when he struck out 7 in 4.1 innings in his Major League debut in 2008. With him currently in a rhythm again, you have to believe he keeps it up in effort of improving his currently gaudy numbers that you know will be in better shape sooner than later. As for potential intimidation when it comes to pitching in Fenway Park on a big stage, keep this in mind: Scherzer, after his awful, awful woes to begin the year, has already faced his toughest intimidation mentally while starting with a 7+ ERA. Thus, having overcome his toughest adversity that he’ll probably have all season, he can meet the challenge of pitching in tonight’s tough assignment. After all, there’s no bigger task than overcoming an extended disastrous start to the season when you are questioning your own ability as a big-league pitcher both mentally and physically.

Going for the Red Sox, of course, is the controversial Josh Beckett, who also seems to have entered a groove of his own. Ever since the game he pitched in the day that “Golf Gate” came out (For lack of a better term. Oh, and the successful over that night was one of my bigger bets of the season - also, ironically, in a Thursday night MLB Network game at Fenway), Beckett has only given up three runs in 21+ innings, proving to all he’s overcome that incident to regain his old form. While he did struggle against the Tigers in his first start of the year, this is a much different scenario. The Red Sox collectively have recovered from their bad start, much like Beckett has, and therefore, he can continue while fully focused in re-establishing himself as one of the better pitchers in the American League. This one appears to be going under.

Milwaukee Brewers @ Los Angeles Dodgers - $57 for $45
Zack Greinke vs Chad Billingsley
UNDER 7

This series between the Brewers and Dodgers has been mostly low-scoring, and I expect that trend to continue here tonight in the second MLB Network game on this Thursday evening. Chad Billingsley has been a real peculiar case this year, sometimes flashing absolute dominance in starts, while also displaying significant wildness in others. Overall, he’s been good in 2012 (3.88 ERA with 52 Ks in 55 IP) and I feel this is a spot where we’ll see his good side as he tries to rescue the Dodgers from a potential four-game sweep. If you’ve watched him pitch, you can clearly tell he’s one of the more passionate ones out there, so a guy like that lives for spots like these in which the spotlight is all on him in trying to help his team in an important scenario (Avoiding an ugly home sweep when you have the best record in the league). That should spell a good mentality for Billingsley heading into this one, and he’s already racked up a good start against the Brew Crew earlier this season.

Zack Greinke, meanwhile, can also be as mixed as they come. Stuff-wise, he’s tremendous, as he’s shown for several years now, but with him, mindset can impact him as much as any other pitcher in the league. In fact, it was a mental-related disorder that had him out of baseball for a year, which is why I tend to stay away from his starts, since human psychology is the main factor in my over/under baseball betting. However, in this specific instance, I see Greinke showing his good side, especially in a lower-pressure situation like this one when the Brewers have already secured the first three games of this huge series with the NL leader. With Matt Kemp out (I’m not a fan of his or anything but damn, you have to respect this man and feel bad for his situation. I love what he’s done with his career and have the upmost respect for him. He was ON PACE for that dream 40/40 season), this only increases Greinke’s chances of churning out a quality start, going up against a depleted Dodgers offense that was resurging, but certainly might feel a let-down from Kemp re-injuring hishamstring. Greinke is coming off arguably his worst start of the year so I don’t see how he can take any pitch in this one for granted, meaning we should see him at least close to top form. If, in my opinion, the most likely worst-case scenario for this game is 5-2, this should put us in good shape to score an under.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
I don't trust MAX, feel like he's gonna get pelted.

I'd usually agree with that same sentiment. Max Scherzer is NOT a reliable pitcher. BUT, in this specific scenario, I do trust him because he's in a real groove right now so I just don't see the switch suddenly flicking off and him getting rocked. He's got tremendous stuff, and as long as he recognizes his own ability and doesn't back down (Which is why he has 24 strikeouts in his last two starts. Bad pitchers never go on a stretch like that), then he can be successful tonight. Plus, with a line as high as 9, there is margin for error, which is another thing I like. We can also win from an excellent start from one of the two, as long as the other doesn't get knocked around, so I feel this is a very good bet, which is why I might even add more to it.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Thanks. Added another $15 for $15 on the under, by the way. Good luck to those in Copy Cat Crew that took it along with me
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
What a surprise, ANOTHER BAD BREAK TO COST ME A BIG UNDER. I mean, seriously, why does this stuff keep happening to me this year? It's just so ridiculous. I was, as usual, correct with my analysis, including the toughest obstacle of all getting a quality start out of Max Scherzer when he's struggled greatly against Boston over his career. I get that, I get 7 fine innings from Beckett, and in an under 9, that's all you need.

Flash forward to the 9th inning, it's 5-3, 2 outs, no one on base, and Rich Hill, Boston's BEST reliever with a 1.67 ERA is in. Miguel Cabrera gets a hit, followed by Prince Fielder's first triple since April 2011 to drive him in, then Delmon Young adds another 2-out RBI hit. Voila, 7-3, and I "lose" despite making the right bet.

It's just unreal how frequent this bad luck it is, yet it continues. Yet, you never see me receive any breaks go in my favor. Just have to somehow keep my head up, which is becoming impossible when this shit is happening on a regular basis.
 

DP5

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
77
Tokens
I'm sure your analysis included this game being tied 3-3 in the 3rd inning. Your bad break whining is getting old. It is just bad capping bud. I'm sure you will get defensive, etc but don't waste your time. You are a flip of the coin capper period.
 

DP5

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
77
Tokens
Regardless of my personal feelings I do sincerely wish you much success in your future plays. Good luck.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
4,368
Tokens
The game over was decided in 3rd inning..no way BOS/Det woud not combine for less than 3 runs the rest of the game. Dont listen to DP5's dick comment. Keep grindin n gl manana
 

DP5

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
77
Tokens
Sorry Cats but I had to say my peace. I'll ban myself from your threads going forward but I do wish you much success going forward. Good luck!
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
I'm sure your analysis included this game being tied 3-3 in the 3rd inning. Your bad break whining is getting old. It is just bad capping bud. I'm sure you will get defensive, etc but don't waste your time. You are a flip of the coin capper period.

So what if it was tied at 3 in the third? At the end of the day, both starters ended up with quality starts, which is an obstacle at Fenway Park, and in an under as high as 9, that's all you need. Starters are always going to give up runs - what matters is their final statline at the end of the game.

And what do you mean by "flip of the coin" capper? Do you know how much time I invest into these over/unders? Several hours daily and nightly. It's the SAME EXACT ROUTINE I used last year in winning 57.5% of the time in 678 over/under bets, with zero days off as well, just like this year.

I'm not trying to argue with you but if you're a regular reader of my threads, you'd notice the ridiculous amount of bad breaks that have gone against me. It truly is unreal because I've ridden this rodeo before and have never seen anything like this - not even close.

And by the way, this is why you can't spend much time considering bullpens when it comes to over/unders. Rich Hill is the Red Sox best reliever, having a terrific season, and unraveled with two outs. Does the Tigers' meat of the order have the potential to do that? Of course, but if you were paying attention to the game, you'd also notice that it should have never even gotten to them in the ninth, as lefty specialist Phil Coke walked the 7 & 8 hitters, Jhonny Peralta and "Dead Bat" Don Kelly, with two outs and no one on, barely throwing a strike.

I'm not trying to come off as whiney at all - just pointing out the ridiculous number of bad breaks that continue to plague me on a regular basis to the point where it just gets so frustrating, because the same technique that won me 57.5% of the time last year, is losing, not because of my ability, but because of fluke breaks and variables that I can't predict or control. It just really pisses me off
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Sorry Cats but I had to say my peace. I'll ban myself from your threads going forward but I do wish you much success going forward. Good luck!

Don't, I encourage all types of feedback and want as many people interacting in my thread as possible. I don't blame you for the comment either - if you're new to my threads, all you see is a guy with a .500 record. Do you have any idea how embarrassing that is to me? I deserve criticism for not even coming close to my success last year - I'm just trying to point out all of these somewhat fluke occurences that happen in my games because this stuff didn't plague me last year. It's mind-bogging.

Just understand, I am so frustrated because what I did last year was one of the greatest accomplishments of my life and thought I truly had it mastered. I invested so much time and effort into that achievement that I thought if I did it again, only with MORE work and MORE effort, I could surpass it. Obviously that has not been the case and it truly upsets me.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
The game over was decided in 3rd inning..no way BOS/Det woud not combine for less than 3 runs the rest of the game. Dont listen to DP5's dick comment. Keep grindin n gl manana

Lol I like you moocow but trust me, an over/under isn't decided until the final out. There's been games that were 7-1 in the first two innings and couldn't go over 9 (A Jeanmar Gomez 2010 game off the top of my head comes to mind... yes I'm that addicted to over/unders that I remember this stuff).

At the end of the day, it was a quality start from Max Scherzer, it was a quality start from Josh Beckett. It was 4-3 in the 8th, 5-3 in the 9th... this game should have been an under given my correct predictions with each starter, or at least a push
 
Last edited:

DP5

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
77
Tokens
Sorry that was indeed a dick comment I made to you. Sorry again and I do hope you get all of the rewards from your hard work breaking down these games. I can tell how much passion you have in analyzing the totals so keep grinding and enjoying your work. I hope you crush it from here on out. I do enjoy reading your write ups so I give you props for that and props for your passion and work ethic.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
4,368
Tokens
Yea i know what ur sayin i have had overs lose and unders cash even after 5 run 1st innings.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Sorry that was indeed a dick comment I made to you. Sorry again and I do hope you get all of the rewards from your hard work breaking down these games. I can tell how much passion you have in analyzing the totals so keep grinding and enjoying your work. I hope you crush it from here on out. I do enjoy reading your write ups so I give you props for that and props for your passion and work ethic.

Thank you. Like I said, though, it's perfectly fine to assume based on my record. For newer readers who go into threads and only see the record, it's natural to assume.

And to those newer readers who are checking me out for the first time, please understand how completely embarrassed I am by my overall record, but my record obviously does not tell the whole story. Not even close, and that's why I get so frustrated. I'm doing the saaaaaaammmmeeeee exact technique I did last year, only this year, bullpens have been messing up at, perhaps, a historic rate. I'm stubborn, though, so I'm not going to change it when it was this same exact and precise technique that gave me lots of success in 2011. But apparently, I might just have to make an adjustment
 

DP5

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
77
Tokens
Cats you have class. More important than any W / L record. Look forward to your write ups on this weekend's series games. Good luck!
 

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
5,135
Tokens
Just an FYI as a life long Red Sox Fan. Rich Hill is good but he is not our best reliever, he has only pitched 10 innings and has always had control problems. I personally like Andrew Miller and think he is gonna keep improving. Not sold on Hill though, he has as many walks as k's, and will give up some hits. I dont want him as our closer yet, yikes
 

New member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
4,368
Tokens
Now the LAD game..that was a bad beat. Perhaps first 5's on your unders may be in order my friend. GL
 

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
47,388
Tokens
Now the LAD game..that was a bad beat. Perhaps first 5's on your unders may be in order my friend. GL

It was 4-1 in the 3rd inning. That is a total of 5 runs. This means 1st Five Innings went OVER too.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,591
Messages
13,452,739
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com