WBO to review Bradley's win over Pacquiao

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
The WBO announced Wednesday that it will review Timothy Bradley's controversial victory over Manny Pacquiao in Saturday's welterweight championship fight.


Bradley, the WBO's junior welterweight champ, moved up in weight and claimed a split decision to take Pacquiao's WBO welterweight belt at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. However, there was a storm of controversy after judges Duane Ford and C.J. Ross both scored the fight 115-113 in favor of Bradley while Jerry Roth had it 115-113 for Pacquiao.


The vast majority of observers had Pacquiao clearly winning the fight, many in lopsided fashion. Top Rank promoter Bob Arum, who promotes both fighters, was outraged and has called on the Nevada attorney general to inquire about the scoring.


WBO president Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel, who was ringside for the fight, said his organization's championship committee will review the fight. He said that the committee "will meet soon" and "will examine (the fight) with five recognized international judges to evaluate the video of the match and agree to what emerges."


Valcarcel said the scoring judges' integrity played no part in his decision to review the fight.


"I want to clarify that in no way does this say we are doubting the capacity of these judges, which we consider as honest and competent judges," Valcarcel said.


The WBO could order a rematch, although that is unnecessary because Pacquiao has a rematch clause in his contract that entitles him to an immediate second fight.


Pacquiao said after the fight that he would like a rematch, and Bradley also has said he would honor the commitment. Arum had Nov. 10 set aside for Pacquiao's next fight, whether against Bradley again or somebody else, well before Saturday's fight.
 

schmuck
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,352
Tokens
shocked that the US Congress hasn't convened a hearing yet.
maybe they will take a fact finding trip to vegas to really
investigate the problem.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
shocked that the US Congress hasn't convened a hearing yet.
maybe they will take a fact finding trip to vegas to really
investigate the problem.

Ehh...That is a really bad precedent to set.

So then what do you do, have a hearing everytime an atrocious decision comes down? They happen a lot more than people think.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
So what's is it going to prove? You know they aren't going to do anything. For judges, it's a 'judgement call". They aren't going to reverse anything!
 

New member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
2,127
Tokens
Administer lie detector tests to the judges. End of story.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
8,332
Tokens
Administer lie detector tests to the judges. End of story.

Its pretty well proven that lie detector tests are not reliable. Not sure why some people actually believe in them. The judges obviously were shady but its too late now
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
Just another part of the Joke.

Something to show the Public that they are Looking into it. It's just all Bullshit. :>(
 

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2008
Messages
3,301
Tokens
That's why the organization is called WBOgus
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,637
Messages
13,453,161
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com