it's better than the BCS, but it still falls short. It just adds two more teams to the mix. I understand it's easy to implement
but picking 8 teams, and the four winners advance after the bowls would give teams like Boise a chance to participate. Going to be hard to convince the BCS conferences to give up the money that goes with one of those 4 spots.
but picking 8 teams, and the four winners advance after the bowls would give teams like Boise a chance to participate. Going to be hard to convince the BCS conferences to give up the money that goes with one of those 4 spots.
They should have just went to a 8 team playoff.... 8 teams would have meant we could have had 4 BCS games mean something instead of just 2 BCS exhibition games.. 8 team playoff means we could stop with all of these teams jumping to other conferences.. We could have had 5 BCS conferences, ACC, Big 12, Big 10, Pac 12, and SEC all get there as champions into the quarterfinals and leaving 3 at large teams scrambling for the last 3 positions.. That means the Boise's of the world would still have there shot and every other year or so, the Big East might even get a team into the field.. There would be no real argument with an 8 team field that a worthy team is being left out...Regular season still would matter since 5 of those spots up for grabs is for champions of these 5 BCS conferences... No way any team can really depend on being 1 of 3 at large teams...... This is a start but my plan is better
