The Cat's MLB Over/Under Bets & Detailed Writeups - July 15, 2012 - YTD: 223-212-21 (1,000+ words of analysis on Santana vs Sheets)

Search
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
2012 MLB O/U Record: 223-212-21, -$1,522 (Been making bigger bets this year, with countless fluke bad breaks, obviously)
2011 MLB O/U Record: 366-270-42, +$1,104

3-2 yesterday, but down for the day after losing my bigger-sized bets. I accept full responsibility in that Harrell vs Lincecum loss, which is a shame because I know Lucas Harrell better than anyone (And he wasn't at his best, took him over 100 pitches just to make it five innings); it’s just too bad I’ve never really had a grasp on the unpredictable enigma known as Tim Lincecum. However, I don’t accept full responsibility in the Hochevar vs Peavy loss, as it turned out to be yet another painful, late-inning, half-a-freaking-run over/under loss in which I easily could have won. No. 1, Jake Peavy had allowed three runs or less in 14 of his previous 17 starts - just my luck that this is one of the 18-percent of his starts where he gives up more than three. No. 2, puny shortstop ALCIDES ESCOBAR had a multi-homer game. Yes, the same Alcides Escobar that has never clocked more than four homers in a season, while playing 150 games a year. Are you kidding me? Obviously, without that fluke incident, the under hits, but sadly, I’m bit by yet another cruel and unusual bad break, although I’ve obviously had much worse happen to me in this strange 2012 season so this one barely phases me. Anyway, on to Sunday…


New York Mets @ Atlanta Braves (Best Bet) - $50 for $46
Johan Santana vs Ben Sheets
UNDER 8.5

When you have studied MLB Over/Unders as long as I have - and every single day for hours at a time without taking zero days off - you automatically and inevitably gain a sense of what the over/under lines for a certain pitching matchup are going to be, well before you actually see them. That said, I’m surprised by the line in this one, as I was definitely expecting the over/under for this Mets/Braves finale to be 8. After all, youhave a true model of consistency taking the hill for one side, that being the great Johan Santana, who has once again solidified himself as one of the true upper-echelon aces in all of baseball. He’s been remarkably consistent in his comeback 2012 season, registering a 6-5 record with a 3.24 ERA, 1.17 WHIP, and 99 Ks in 102 innings, high-end numbers from a guy that most weren’t expecting following severe injury. In the process, Santana has allowed three runs or less in 12 of his 17 starts, an impressive tendency when you break it down over an extended period of time. While Santana has had mixed results against the Braves this year, the key in predicting this certain performance is where it comes in the season - Santana hasn’t pitched since a woeful outing against the Cubs on July 6, and these eight days off, including the all-star break, have most likely allowed him to kind of refresh and reset himself as he prepares for the grueling second half that is ahead, one that will require him to continue his string of mostly excellent pitching in order to keep the Mets in playoff contention. It’s human nature: Put yourself in the mind of Johan Santana after what he’s been through. Nobody really expected you to cruise the way you have been after surgery; at the same time, it’s possible you were losing your sense of urgency after impressing everyone all year. Therefore, with an extended break like Santana just had, he’ll be better off now that his mind and his arm area bit more fresh and clear again, which is especially crucial for his first start proceeding the layoff.

Of course, that’s the easier factor in all of this is trying to know what we will get out of Johan Santana. The much more difficult variable, obviously, will be what to anticipate from the arm of the returning Ben Sheets. It’s been quite a miraculous journey for the former first-round pick - similar, actually, to his opposing hurler for today - as he seemingly fell off the face of the earth, going from dependable ace, to just another story of a guy with enormous potential, only to lose it due to frequent injury. He hasn’t lost all of his potential though, hence why he has received another opportunity to pitch in the big leagues, which is something that cannot be said for a lot of past aces when they are chucked by the wayside. Sheets still has something left, and given his terrific track record, it’s a wise investment to make. What makes this all the more intriguing is that this chance has beeng ranted to him by the Atlanta Braves- the same brilliant personnel that has put together arguably the best pitching staffs in baseball over the past two decades. If this were any other team, you could have your questions, but if there’s one organization that knows pitching more than anyone else, you could easily argue that it would be Atlanta, which makes this a safer-than-usual bet, considering the situation. That’s not everything, of course, which is why it’s important to note Sheets’ minor-league numbers since being signed by Atlanta, and while he did give up six runs in 11 innings at Double-A Mississippi (Most of which came in his first start), that’s an overrated factor, as a lot of past successful pitchers don't always give it their all or reveal their best in these rehab/return assignments (Ex. Jeff Suppan earlier this year had a 13+ ERA in multiple Triple-A starts for the Padres before making his first start back. And what did he do in that first start back? Only shut out the Brewers’ tough lineup over five or six innings). It’s human nature for a lot of people - not even just in baseball, but in anything - that you cannot be at your finest when you’re not facing the finest competition because mentally, you’re just not all there as a result. He will be today, however, facing Major League hitters for the first time since 2010, and the important thing I gathered from those minor league outings was his 10:1 K:BB ratio, indicating hes till has control and the ability to potentially overpower Major League lineups again. At the end of the day, if you take this under, you’re also buying intothe fact that this is a very critical pitching decision made by the Atlanta Braves organization, and that’s surely a good bet to make.


Other 7/15 MLB Over/Unders I’m Taking:
Jake Westbrook vs Homer Bailey OVER 9 -$23 for $20


**May Add More Over/Under(s) Throughout Day Leading Up To Gametime**
(Probably also going to take Sale vs Mendoza under, just waiting to see if line goes up to 9)
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Also, Sale vs Mendoza went up to 9, which is very nice of Vegas considering Chris Sale is involved (And I've always liked Luis Mendoza since his days as a Ranger, even though he was horrendous back then). Therefore:

Chris Sale vs Luis Mendoza UNDER 9 - $37 for $35
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
1,338
Tokens
Already starting the second half by whining about a bad break? It's bad enough every ninth inning beat is a bad break loss but when Peavy gets pounded that is also a bad break?? Shit happens dude. It's sports...And for someone who claims to know every pitcher like the back of his hand one would think you would be better than 10 games over .500 with over 450 plays after coming off an undocumented successful season...I wish no ill will upon you Cat. Ive told you that before but your schtick gets old.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Already starting the second half by whining about a bad break? It's bad enough every ninth inning beat is a bad break loss but when Peavy gets pounded that is also a bad break?? Shit happens dude. It's sports...And for someone who claims to know every pitcher like the back of his hand one would think you would be better than 10 games over .500 with over 450 plays after coming off an undocumented successful season...I wish no ill will upon you Cat. Ive told you that before but your schtick gets old.

I 100-percent understand that some of you get tired of my whining. Lol if I were a reader of myself, I probably would be, too. But it's HARD to ignore that these bad beats farrrrr exceed the "good" ones that go my way. Far exceed it. These are legit gripes because they continually happen. If it was once in awhile, okay, that's part of the business. But that's the only point I try to emphasize - they keep happening, like even on Friday when I was 2-0-1 and the one "push" should have been a win, considering it was 7-1 in the top of the 5th (Needed over 9. Bullpens have never held on for something like that for me all year). Sorry, getting into whiney mode again; all I'm trying to illustrate is the frequency of its occurences towards myself.

By the way, the bad break wasn't Peavy - everyone is prone to an off start. The bad break was that Alcides Escobar, who has never hit more than four home runs in a SEASON when he averages 150 games a year (And only had two all of this year), had his first career multi-home run game of his career, AND against one of the best pitchers in all of baseball no less. That's normal? Of course it's not, and whoever had the over had nooo clueee they'd have to depend on a puny shortstop to produce his first ever (And what will probably be his only ever) two-homer game. Does stuff like this happen in baseball? Of course it does, but I point it out because these weird oddities just continue to happen to me when it shouldn't affect my correct analysis (Although I will admit I expected a better showing from Hochevar, who did hold his own in five innings, but I expected more from him).

And actually, everything that I did from 2011 was documented, as I detailed in great lengths in the beginning of the year. Provide me with your e-mail address and I'll gladly send you the 27-pages of documentation of my 2011 performance. In fact, you could test me more. I'll give you my personal phone number, and you can then ask me about any of my bigger-sized bets from last year, and I'll tell you the day of the week and the month that it occurred in. Still have doubts? I'll give you the username and password to my personal betting account on ace23.com, in which you can track everything I did back to early August 2011 (My bookie switched sites from justwagers.com mid-season). If I were to ever lie about anything, why did I come on here the third day of the season and immediately admit to a 1-3 record? Wouldn't I ignore that if I had no credibility, since nobody saw it? Better yet, when I started posting my dollar amounts and +/- $$ amount in late-April/early-May, why did I admit to being down hundreds of dollars for the season when I was 15 or so games over .500? Wouldn't I have lied about that, too?

Come on, man. I've contributed 1,000-word articles to this site literally every single day of the season (Other than the first two since I wasn't on here) and you're really going to say something like that? I know you don't mean any ill will towards me but considering the passion and dedication I have expressed towards my beloved MLB Over/Unders, and the hours Every Single Day I spend on this stuff, it's very disheartening to me personally. That's the only reason I came here in the first place - my success last year. Why would I lie about that? I think by now, with everything that I've given, you can tell I'm one of the few "real people" out there who wears my heart on my sleeve through my writing, instead of the vast majority out there, who are simply "message board posters." Everything I have put on here is 100-percent truthful. If that wasn't the case, why would I waste my time spending countless hours on this stuff every day?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
1,338
Tokens
I didnt mean to come off as sounding like I dont believe your record. Although I will say when you first started posting in April I pm'd you asking for your documentation and you never responded nor have I heard of anyone coming on here backing you up on that documentation. With that being said I don't want to see it anymore. Ive seen 2012 as documentation...and I truly do appreciate the amount of work that clearly goes into your writeups. But dude even if you don't consider Peavy getting shelled a bad beat it's not like Escobar hit a walk off in the ninth to kill your under. It's baseball. Shit happens. It's not A bad beat because some guy who never hits homers hit two before the ninth inning. If that's the case is the Sox first run in the third a bad break since the run walked to get on base?
 

New member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
4,368
Tokens
True 9th inning bullpen collapses and blown saves to decide the over/under are only things i consider bad beats. That little guy in houston to push the game over in the 9th with a grand slama few weeks ago..now thats a bad beat lol.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
I didnt mean to come off as sounding like I dont believe your record. Although I will say when you first started posting in April I pm'd you asking for your documentation and you never responded nor have I heard of anyone coming on here backing you up on that documentation. With that being said I don't want to see it anymore. Ive seen 2012 as documentation...and I truly do appreciate the amount of work that clearly goes into your writeups. But dude even if you don't consider Peavy getting shelled a bad beat it's not like Escobar hit a walk off in the ninth to kill your under. It's baseball. Shit happens. It's not A bad beat because some guy who never hits homers hit two before the ninth inning. If that's the case is the Sox first run in the third a bad break since the run walked to get on base?

I've never gotten a PM from you, but if you'd still like, I'll gladly send it to you because it's uncomfortable to me if someone has any doubts concerning arguably the greatest personal accomplishment of my life (Which is exactly why I post it; to remind myself of what I did and what I am capable of any on given day, given how I performed last season), and you can see the intense hard work I put into it, because I also spent countless hours after last season doing an in-depth stat breakdown of my own 2011 performance (Record with each team, pitcher. Record on each day of the week, each month... I used table format in Microsoft Word Starter, instead of Microsoft Excel, which would have saved me A LOT of time). And there's no use for anyone having their friends come on a site to support them when said person could easily make up an account and say things themselves, unfortunately. That, and none of my personal friends do stuff like this on other sites or go on message boards so they'd probably just laugh if I even asked them to lol

As for this Escobar thing, does weird stuff like that happen in baseball? Of course it does, and anyone who fails to acknowledge that doesn't know the true spirit of baseball - it's one of those sentiments that makes baseball as special as it is in everyday society. When every team plays an astounding 162 games, not even including postseason contests when the strangest of occurrences can happen, over a long six-month period, it's inevitable that strange things happen. That, compared to some of the other stuff that has happened to me this year however (Ex. As moocow pointed out above, 5-foot-5, 145-pound, .210-hitting-at-the-time Alexei Amarista's first career home run - a grand slam- coming with two-outs in the ninth inning against Houston when the Padres had previously lost their past 112 STRAIGHT games when trailing entering the ninth inning, which cost me the under and a $100 swing... might be the No. 1 bad beat in all of baseball this year for an over/under), isn't all that bad, which is why I didn't really get into it other than mentioning it because it is what it is - a strange oddity. I'll leave it at that.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
True 9th inning bullpen collapses and blown saves to decide the over/under are only things i consider bad beats. That little guy in houston to push the game over in the 9th with a grand slama few weeks ago..now thats a bad beat lol.

Haha exactly, moocow! And unfortunately, ninth-inning collapses have bitten my unders too many times this year, while rarely rewarding me in overs (The one time was an Orioles/White Sox Monday night game that I won when Hector Santiago was closing, so not much of a surprise), specifically in the two-out variety (Carlos Gomez pinch-hit 2-run homer against the Dodgers on a Thursday, Yan Gomes meaningless pinch-hit 2-out two-run homer against Sean Burnett's at-the-time 0.93 ERA on a Monday night to cost me the under, etc. Those two games added up to a $250 swing)
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,592
Messages
13,452,749
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com