The Cat's MLB Over/Under Bets & Detailed Writeups - July 22, 2012 - YTD: 236-228-24 (1,300+ words of precise SP analysis)

Search
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
2012 MLB O/U Record: 236-228-24, -$1,608 (Been making bigger bets this year, with countless fluke bad breaks, obviously)
2011 MLB O/U Record: 366-270-42, +$1,104

Well, disappointing 3-5-1 day to say the least, as I took a season-high nine over/unders yesterday, trying to capture some of that magic I had exactly three months to the day when I posted the ultra-rare 8-0 perfect day on 4/21. In my defense, at least when it comes to yesterday’s best bet Vargas vs Cobb over 7.5, I really wasn’t given a fair opportunity, as it looked like a lock early on with Alex Cobb getting smacked around, before Cobb was literally smacked - by a line drive that knocked him out of the game in the second. He was floundering up to that point, having given up two runs in the first and multiple hits and walks throughout those first two frames, so with him out of the picture, aka the main reason why I took that bet, that’s when the trouble started for that over, and just my luck, the Rays’ horrific bullpen (Joel Peralta has single-handedly cost me three of my biggest unders this year) somehow shut out the hot-hitting Mariners over the last seven innings. Whatever, let’s just move on to this Sunday, as I have a trifecta of solid unders with some of my trademark pitchers that I know extremely well…


Blake Beavan vs Matt Moore UNDER 8 - $41 for $35
I was going to put more on this game, only to find out that for some reason, my sportsbook lowered it to 7.5. Let that sink in: A pitching matchup featuring a guy with a 6+ ERA and someone who has spent the last several weeks in Triple-A is getting the 7.5 treatment, and it’s not like he’s facing a Clayton Kershaw-type pitcher; it’s Matt Moore. Of course, we know better than the general consensus, which would probably label the extremely underrated Blake Beavan as an “average pitcher,” and that’s something Vegas is clearly trying to take advantage of from the general public. In addition, they may also place Moore in the same category, as he has fallen short of his mega expectations thus far in his 2012 campaign, but if you’ve actually watched him like I have, you’d know he still possesses the same dominant stuff he displayed in his impressive debut last year - and he will continue to display it for many years throughout a wildly successful big-league career. To me, it’s inevitable that Matt Moore becomes a star, as I’ve been saying all year. Let me put it this way: This is as good an opportunity you will have at buying good pitchers low. Regular readers know my obsession with Blake Beavan, who was my No. 1 sleeper coming into this season, and it was well warranted. He was terrific last year, and other than a poor run that led to him being sent down (Which, by the way, wasn’t all his fault; he was hit by a lined rive in May that maybe stunted his growth, confidence, and mindset), Beavan has shown he can still be a very good pitcher. He was wonderful in his Triple-A stint and it’s clear he’s on the way back up to relevance - same with Moore, except he’s grinding his way towards stardom, which Beavan may also be at one day.


Jordan Lyles vs Josh Collmenter UNDER 9.5 - $46 for $40
Again, an intriguing line movement set forth by Vegas, as this one currently sits at 9… why?? Do they forget that they had a much superior pitching matchup from the other night in Arizona, Bud Norris vs Trevor Cahill, was also 9? I mean, think about that. Bud Norris is obviously well ahead of teammate Jordan Lyles, while Trevor Cahill is a much more respected and renowned pitcher than fellow Diamondback righty Josh Collmenter. Yet, they get the same exact line? That, my friends, is a fishy deal. However, it also means they clearly agree with me in anticipating some sort of under. Collmenter is a guy I became a fan of last year with his tremendous season, not to mention his striking similar physical looks to Mike Hampton (Ode to the 2009 Astros), and I pinpointed that remarkable re-emergence he had into the Arizona rotation when he dueled withYovani Gallardo a few Sundays ago. Now, he’s back with the demotion of wild-man Trevor Bauer, and as he showed in that start versus Milwaukee, when he gets that opportunity to start again, he runs with it, and Collmenter draws a very nice matchup with the Astros in his first outing as a starter again. Mentally, he has to be feeling good. As for Jordan Lyles, I was starting to become a fan of him when he put together a nice string of three or four consecutive starts six weeks ago. He’s fallen off that pace, but I still think he’s a fine kid with a future in this league. This is a spot where I think he’ll outpitch his other teammates that threw in this series and give us a serviceable effort, one that could contribute to an under with the line as high as it is.


Nathan Eovaldi vs Jon Niese UNDER 8 -$42 for $40
Interesting fact: Nathan Eovaldi has made nine starts this year, NONE OF WHICH resulting in more than eight total runs being scored! Actually, I hate trends like that because usually when you discover a really odd trend like that, the Law of Averages usually kicks into play and goes the other way. Even so, you have to like how Eovaldi has re-turned his season around. After an impressive start (Which was no surprise to me, given his underrated 2011 performance) that saw him register a quality start in each of his first five outings, Eovaldi underwent a bit of a tailspin, giving up 13 runs over his next two. However, the Dodger right-hander has overcome that to record quality starts in his last two efforts, including a very impressive statement game in which he hurled six innings giving up only one run in Arizona, which is awfully tough to do. Having surpassed his struggles, I think Eovaldi can keep it up, and while he did surrender five runs in his previous start against the Mets a few weeks ago, that was mostly the product of one bad inning - he was cruising up till that point. Speaking of cruising, you could easily apply that term to the overall season Jon Niese is having for the Mets. Entering play today with a 7-4 record, 3.58 ERA, 1.17 WHIP, and an impressive 99 Ks in 110 IP, Niese has easily made a case for truly being one of the most underrated pitchers in all of baseball. I don’t consider him in the highest regard, but his stats, in which he picked up where he left off with a marvelous 2011 campaign, indicate otherwise. Niese had his worst performanceof the year two starts ago, when he was hammered for seven runs against the Cubs, but bounced back nicely in his last assignment, minimizing the tough Nationals’ bats to one run and three hits over seven innings, while striking out eight. That tells me that Niese has forgotten about that bad Cubs start, and considering six of his past eight starts have seen him give up two runs orless, it’s safe to say he’s still in his rhythm right now. Let’s just hope the Mets don’t tag Eovaldi late in this game like they did a few weeks ago.


**May Add More Over/Under(s) Throughout Day Leading Up To Gametime**
(Also recommend Humber vs Turner over 10, as my absolute worst-case scenario for that game is 5-4, but since that’s a very likely scenario, I’m backing off from it)
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Now that's the Blake Beavan I've been hyping up all year. Nobody in the country knows this guy better than I do; been tracking him for years, after all. Future ace.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Typical BS allows me from sweeping those three big bets, as I was 100% right, as usual, on Eovaldi vs Niese under. It was 3-2 in the ninth, and of course, the Dodgers blow the save against these free-falling Mets, only for them to erupt in the top of the 12th... I mean, why can't that ever happen for me in my favor? So many times this year I had an under that I was right about going into extra innings, with much room for runs to be scored and still being able to win (Ex. The other night's Giants/Braves under that was 1-1 going into extra innings. Such fucking bullshit), but whenever I have an over that goes into extra innings, the minimum one run will score and I lose.

It's just unbelievable how the bad luck never stops. Guess I should take pride in leading the entire country, without question, in bad beats this year.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,059
Tokens
:cryingcry:cryingcry

It happens to all of us, not just you bud. The main thing is to forget about the losses and not dwell on them. If you need a bailout game play the over in tonights Texas/LAA game and, again, thank me later.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
:cryingcry:cryingcry

It happens to all of us, not just you bud. The main thing is to forget about the losses and not dwell on them. If you need a bailout game play the over in tonights Texas/LAA game and, again, thank me later.

"It happens to all of us"

This stuff happens to everyone ALMOST EVERY DAY? If you followed my threads every day, you'd know what I'm talking about. Every regular reader of mine will vouch that I lead the entire country this year in bad beats, period. Feel free to go through the archives and enjoy quite the comical laugh at all the unusual bizarre stuff that has happened to me... with very, very rare "good" breaks going my way.

And that's the same advice I give to everyone as to not dwell on them, but it's awfully tough not to dwell on them when these bad beats are so consistent. It's unescapable.

Oh, and look, despite being 1-1 in the sixth inning of an under 9.5, my Lyles vs Collmenter has somehow "lost." Used to it. At least I gave you guys - at least the ones that take the 5-inning variation of my unders - yet another win (Not to mention with Eovaldi vs Niese). Am I still hitting 60-percent of those? I remember a couple of people have come on here and said they were winning over 60-percent of my unders, except in the five-inning form.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
:cryingcry:cryingcry
If you need a bailout game play the over in tonights Texas/LAA game and, again, thank me later.

Forgot to comment on this game. I was leaning on the over when I first saw the game but I don't want to force it. It is a little fishy, though, that the line is as low as it is, considering this isn't the same Dan Haren anymore, and Matt Harrison, as much as I've loved him since we acquired him in the 2007 Mark Teixeira trade, is due to get tagged a bit. The over is the correct bet but for some reason, Vegas is trying to bait people into it, as they have an under vibe. Hmm
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,059
Tokens
I get so tired of people trying to read the mind of "Vegas". I believe the people that make those kind of comments as you did are amature at best....BOL to you.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
55
Tokens
"It happens to all of us"

This stuff happens to everyone ALMOST EVERY DAY? If you followed my threads every day, you'd know what I'm talking about. Every regular reader of mine will vouch that I lead the entire country this year in bad beats, period. Feel free to go through the archives and enjoy quite the comical laugh at all the unusual bizarre stuff that has happened to me... with very, very rare "good" breaks going my way.

And that's the same advice I give to everyone as to not dwell on them, but it's awfully tough not to dwell on them when these bad beats are so consistent. It's unescapable.

Oh, and look, despite being 1-1 in the sixth inning of an under 9.5, my Lyles vs Collmenter has somehow "lost." Used to it. At least I gave you guys - at least the ones that take the 5-inning variation of my unders - yet another win (Not to mention with Eovaldi vs Niese). Am I still hitting 60-percent of those? I remember a couple of people have come on here and said they were winning over 60-percent of my unders, except in the five-inning form.

Cats, I respect your level of commitment, but your constant whining really makes it tough to root for you. Blown saves happen, bullpens give up runs and leads. Baseball is a 9 inning game; you can't gripe if a team scores runs after the 5th or 6th inning. From what I've read, you've considered 80-90% of your losses as "bad beats" and that you were "100 percent correct, but weren't rewarded." Come on man, get over yourself. Take the losses in stride and own up to being on the wrong side. There is little doubt that you'll get more respect from accepting your losses rather than whining about taking bad beats.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
5,135
Tokens
Cats, I respect your level of commitment, but your constant whining really makes it tough to root for you. Blown saves happen, bullpens give up runs and leads. Baseball is a 9 inning game; you can't gripe if a team scores runs after the 5th or 6th inning. From what I've read, you've considered 80-90% of your losses as "bad beats" and that you were "100 percent correct, but weren't rewarded." Come on man, get over yourself. Take the losses in stride and own up to being on the wrong side. There is little doubt that you'll get more respect from accepting your losses rather than whining about taking bad beats.

you must not be a member of the Copy Cat Crew
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
55
Tokens
its what Cat names his followers, thought you knew that since its seems you follow his thread


Haha, I am definitely not a member. I appreciate his commitment to totals though, but not so much his reactions to his wins/losses. Btw, you're solid skyla- tough day but I know you'll get back on track as soon as the games start tomorrow.
 

Don't assume people in charge know what they are d
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
6,476
Tokens
Lots of hard work with too much whine!



 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,634
Messages
13,453,128
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com