The Cat's MLB Over/Under Bets & Detailed Writeups - September 1, 2012 - YTD: 305-279-36

Search
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
2012 MLB O/U Record: 305-279-36, -$1,273 (Was making much bigger bets earlier in the year, with countless fluke bad breaks, obviously. I also undoubtedly lead the country in half-run/one-run losses)
2011 MLB O/U Record: 366-270-42, +$1,104

Wow. It is truly unbelievable that we have arrived to September, the final month of the baseball regular season. I mean, April still feels like yesterday, so it is just absolutely mind-boggling that today is September 1st. It’s been a long, strange season, consisting of both high points and low points, but at the end of the day, I just can’t believe we’ve made it to this specific point in time so quickly. By the way, I STILL have not missed a day doing these 1,000-word-ish articles detailing my beloved MLB Over/Unders, and of course, you can fully expect that to continue as we chug through this last month, not to mention playoff time, but postseason over/unders, in my opinion, are much different from regular season ones, so I plan on ending the regular season as strong as possible to help prepare myself mentally for October. Hopefully September turns out to be just as good as my terrific August (52-35-8), so let’s see what this first day has to offer up…


San Francisco Giants @ Chicago Cubs - $46 for $40
Tim Lincecum vs Justin Germano
UNDER 8

Interestingly, I’m staying in Chicago for game two of this series, after being saddled with a push in game one yesterday when I certainly deserved better after boldly predicting that not only would Chris Volstad and his 6+ ERA win the damn game (Which was +170, by the way), but that he’d be the one who carried the under, rather than the always-more dependable Madison Bumgarner. But instead, the score ended up 6-4, thus earning a push, so whatever. Can’t dwell on that, as we have an interesting pitching matchup here, featuring the always-interesting Tim Lincecum. When people look back on this 2012 season, one of the main storylines will be the fall of Big-Time Timmy Jim, but that doesn’t mean he can’t salvage his season. In fact, if you haven’t been paying attention, you don’t know that he’s already begun doing so, as evident in his 4-4 record and 3.31 ERA since the all-star break (Which also feels like yesterday, by the way). In addition, in 54 innings spanning those nine starts, he has 51 strikeouts and just 18 walks, which were the two biggest factors in his decline - prior to the break, his punch-outs were down from his norm, while the walks were vice-versa. However, since he has seemingly fixed that problem, we’re starting to see more of the normal Lincecum, which can only mean good things as it pertains to today. Of course, pitching in Wrigley Field can always be tough, but he handled it easily last year, shutting the Cubs down to one run and five hits in seven innings, while striking out nine. Hopefully he contributes a similar effort this afternoon.

And then there is Justin Germano, whose name you don’t often attach to a prospective under. Actually, Justin Germano is yet to start in ANY under this season. The former Padre great has made six starts since entering the rotation in late-July, and the lowest score produced from any of those outings was 7-2 against the Astros. Other than that, the total scores from his starts have summed up to between 13 (Losing 7-6 on August 5) to19 (Losing 15-4 on August 27, his most recent assignment). So why oh why am I attacking an under that has this guy in it? Well, aside from the Law ofAverages, which should certainly be in our favor, I like his attitude, aside from thinking the right-hander has some talent that can be useful. After his disastrous last outing, he simply attributed it to “three mistakes that led to four runs,” and he talked about just “minimizing” those mistakes, which is a mentality I like because he also acknowledges you can’t be perfect. It’s also helpful because Germano, after a nice start to his tenure in Chicago, has been at his worst over his last two starts, so with those sentiments he made, it doesn’t appear he gets knocked down easily (Mentally). Thus, I can see him as a hard worker, and with the way has season has gone south over the past two weeks, I think he’ll be committed in righting the ship. He is a veteran, after all. Germano also will have the wind strongly in his favor (Blowing in 13 MPH), and since he’s prone to the long ball (Four straight starts he’s allowed one), that should help limit the damage done against him, possibly leading to a quality start (It also helps that Posey has a day off). Luckily, with the line at 8, which I actually thought would be lower given how extreme the winds, there is a little wiggle room in case he falters, but hopefully we get that dynamite start from Lincecum to really carry this one. 5-2/6-1 will do it.


**Will DEFINITELY Add More Over/Under(s) Throughout Day Leading Up To Gametime**


**Remember that if you have a question concerning an over/under, I will gladly assist you with it if I see it before the game starts, even the ones I don’t bet on, as I have at least a small vibe on every single over/under from studying this stuff several hours every single day and night**
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
*Actually, for whatever reason, Posey is unfortunately in the line-up (Playing first base), which COMPLETELY goes against what Bruce Bochy was talking about after yesterday's game about needing to give him a day off with his lingering ankle issue, and probably having to "press the issue" on Posey and "taking it out of his hands." Way to contradict everything you were talking about less than 24 hours ago, Bruce. Hopefully this doesn't bite us. In other news, how about this: XAVIER NADY is in the lineup today for San Francisco... he still plays??
 

New member
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
93
Tokens
again same song, dont have offer for under/over Giants vs.Cubs, just simple bet on win ^<<^

so I'll take the under 9.5 on the Orioles vs.Yankees
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
again same song, dont have offer for under/over Giants vs.Cubs, just simple bet on win ^<<^

so I'll take the under 9.5 on the Orioles vs.Yankees

Lol what?? Like I said yesterday, if I were you, I would call and complain non-stop to your sportsbook that they're not putting up certain bets. That's wrong on so many levels and a bookie has no right in doing that. Inexcusable on their part.

I can't even imagine what my reaction would be if there was ever an occurrence where an over/under I really, really liked wasn't up to bet on. I'd probably flip out
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
hey cat.What are your thoughts on the yankee and tb overs.

Sometimes, it's tough to read my own vibes. But the fact that I'm laying off the Niemann vs Alvarez matchup indicates I'm leaning towards the over, since I've always liked Alavrez since he popped onto the scene last year, while Niemann's always been a guy I liked a bit, too, but the fact that this is his first start back since early or mid-May means it's really a game everyone should lay off of from both standpoints. PLUS, Niemann was just hit by a linedrive in a minor league game, which could also damper his mindset. Certainly a game to avoid.

As for the Yankee game, barely a lean on the over also, but that's a game that could go either way. I'm very indifferent on that matchup because it's two guys (Chen and Phelps) who I haven't really been as invested into as most starting pitchers this season
 

New member
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
93
Tokens
Lol what?? Like I said yesterday, if I were you, I would call and complain non-stop to your sportsbook that they're not putting up certain bets. That's wrong on so many levels and a bookie has no right in doing that. Inexcusable on their part.

I can't even imagine what my reaction would be if there was ever an occurrence where an over/under I really, really liked wasn't up to bet on. I'd probably flip out

Man how can I complain? I can call them, but in this case would only get laughs and laughs, they are the bosses, what they have to offer - they have, no one from a side can affect it. To be honest my bookie is not so bad but sometimes fucked up early games.

Sorry for off topic and good luck today.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
12,348
Tokens
Man how can I complain? I can call them, but in this case would only get laughs and laughs, they are the bosses, what they have to offer - they have, no one from a side can affect it. To be honest my bookie is not so bad but sometimes fucked up early games.

Sorry for off topic and good luck today.

i would look for a new book ASAP
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Ahh just an unfortunate bad break to start the game. Not sure if anyone is watching Giants/Cubs but on that at-bat to Hunter Pence in the top of the first, with two strikes and two outs, Germano actually threw a sinker for strike three, but catcher Welington Castillo was expecting something else for some reason and got "crossed up," and since he skidded over to his right expecting a slider, it completely threw off umpire Dan Iassogna, who called it a ball (Look at MLB.com Gamecast if you don't believe me).

Even the Giants announcers referred to it as a "break," as it kept the inning alive rather than ending it, and boom, four runs ended up scoring because Germano got pissed about it (He actually had a meeting with Castillo on the mound right after the pitch) and went through the motions. Hopefully that's a bad break we can not let haunt us because that's a real shame, that was a CLEAR strike three and the catcher fucked it up.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
1,342
Tokens
The line is fishy.1st game was 9,2nd game 8 1/2 with 2 lousy pitchers.Also like houston and under with harrel at home.HES BEEN PRETTY SOLID THERE.i think the la dodger game goes under too.Feel like beckett shows up today 4-1 score.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
The line is fishy.1st game was 9,2nd game 8 1/2 with 2 lousy pitchers.Also like houston and under with harrel at home.HES BEEN PRETTY SOLID THERE.i think the la dodger game goes under too.Feel like beckett shows up today 4-1 score.

Not fishy at all, in my opinion. As I discussed in the beginning of the year, I'm a BIG Liam Hendriks fan, and that duel he had with King Felix on Monday was only the tip of the iceberg, and I expect him to finally start rolling. I also like Luke Hochevar, who has been outstanding lately, but I'm still undecided with the line at 8.5.

The Harrell game you should be more comfortable with if the line was 8 instead of 7.5, as I see it dropped a half-run overnight. I just can't resist my dear Lucas Harrell unders, he just gets in the zone.

And yes, I agree with the Beckett under. He's clearly rejuvenated and should be excellent in his first few Dodger starts, I anticipate. Pertaining to the late games, though, I actually like the Doubront vs Griffin UNDER more
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Final decisions on my 7 o'clock action:

Burnett vs Estrada UNDER 8 - $33 for $30
Liriano vs Scherzer UNDER 8.5 - $24 for $20
Bailey vs Harrell UNDER 8 - $24 for $20
Feldman vs Gomez OVER 9 - $21 for $20 (Shadiest line in weeks, actually)
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Adding:

Volquez vs Chacin OVER 10.5 - $18 for $15
Souls be at least one crooked number on the board there.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,479
Messages
13,451,910
Members
99,416
Latest member
go789click
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com