What exactly was your logic in taking this over, other than hearing from "syndicates"? Ryan Vogelsong has suddenly looked like the awful Ryan Vogelsong of 2006 over his past several starts (Including getting belted a bit by the Astros in his last start... that's when you know something is up with him, unfortunately), while Ian Kennedy, as good as he can be, has been mostly erratic this year, with little consistency, to lay a big wager on an over/under that features him in it.
Did these "syndicates" provide some sort of write-up explaining their logic? I thought this was a particular over/under to stay away from, given each's recent track record, especially Vogelsong. Such a good story these past two years, but clearly, he has suddenly hit his ceiling and has to figure something out either mentally or physically.
Did these "syndicates" provide some sort of write-up explaining their logic? I thought this was a particular over/under to stay away from, given each's recent track record, especially Vogelsong. Such a good story these past two years, but clearly, he has suddenly hit his ceiling and has to figure something out either mentally or physically.
Nobody, has rabbit ears quite like you but then again anyone that has THIRTEEN THOUSAND posts doesn't have time for much more than being the RX ass kisser. You should be one of the mods as you're in everyone's thread. You're nothing more than tolerated here and never taken seriously for your pseudo-handicapping that you've pilfered.
