The Cat's MLB Playoff Over/Under Bets & Detailed Writeups - October 9, 2012 - YTD: 4-3 (2012 Season: 361-329-47; 108-82-20, 57% from Aug 2-on)

Search
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
2012 MLB O/U Playoff Record: 4-3, -$49
2011 MLB O/U Playoff Record: 14-11-3, +$5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 MLB O/U Season Record: 361-329-47, -$1,490 (Was making much bigger bets earlier in the year, with countless fluke bad breaks, obviously. I also undoubtedly lead the country in half-run/one-run losses)
2011 MLB O/U Season Record: 366-270-42, +$1,104

Feels good to have bounced back from my 0-2 start (Including the Lohse vs Medlen bad beat) to the postseason with a 4-1 performance over the past few days, although that really should be a 5-0 run if not for the painful bad beat in Game 1 of Reds/Giants Saturday night, but what can you do? I’m just thankful I was able to recover quickly because as I continually warned you guys coming down the stretch, there are no guarantees in the playoffs. Anything can happen, and those types of games aren’t my strength, compared to the mundane, routine games of the regular season that I thrive on. In any case, here we are now days into the Divisional Series round, so let’s see what this latest slate on this Tuesday has to offer…


San Francisco Giants @ Cincinnati Reds (Best Bet) - $60 for $50
Ryan Vogelsong vs Homer Bailey
UNDER 8

When it comes to the middle-games of a playoff series, I believe they have more potential from a betting perspective, at least as it pertains to over/unders, because at this point, everyone has, for the most part, settled down their nerves and are ready to contribute more of their usual, expected production, now that the variables involved are more steady. That could be a very good thing as it relates to this particular pitching matchup. Let me start with Ryan Vogelsong, who, only a few weeks ago, was struggling so mightily that there was even a “Fade Ryan Vogelsong” thread created to make money off his misfortunes, despite his very good recent track record over these past couple of years. I don’t remember if that idea had much success at that point in time, but it certainly wasn’t a bad idea, given Vogelsong’s ugly seven-start stretch that resulted in his ERA jumping up almost a full run… in early-September. Over those aforementioned seven starts, Vogelsong gave up three runs or more in each one, with five of them seeing him allow four or more. Luckily for the former Pirate great, Vogelsong bounced back significantly, yielding just one measly run over his final three starts (Spanning 17 innings) to close out the season, leading me to believe that he has his confidence back, and thus, is ready to pump out a quality start in the biggest assignment of his career. Unfortunately, with this being his first career postseason start, we really don’t have precedent for how he’s feeling mentally, but the important thing is that after his hot stretch to end his 2012 campaign, he has confidence again, which is what you absolutely need to be successful as a pitcher, especially in these higher-pressure situations. As long as Vogelsong maintains his momentum from the end of the season more so than thinking about his team’s very troubling 0-2 hole, then we should get him in his top form.

Opposing him will be Homer Bailey, who will be in a very nice spot here. First and foremost, let me just say that I am very impressed with what Bailey has done this year. Why? Well for years, I always thought he was overrated, and while I never really mentioned that on here (If anything, I took more of his unders than overs this year, especially lately), I just wanted to mention that because I always find it intriguing when you suddenly want to back a pitcher after being down on him for awhile. So yeah, I was pleasantly surprised with Bailey’s impressive 2012 season, one in which that saw him go 13-10 with a more-than-respectable 3.68 ERA and 1.24 WHIP, while also eating up more than 200 innings, which is usually the standalone sign that you’ve had a good year as a starting pitcher. And of course, you can’t forget his no-hitter from a couple of weeks ago against AJ Burnett (My FIFTH under on a no-hitter/perfect game this year, by the way. Is that a Vegas record?). That all being known, you have to believe Homer Bailey is in the best stretch of his entire career (1.86 ERA, 0.66 WHIP over seven September/October starts), and when a starting pitcher is feeling that comfortable entering a start, especially a lesser-pressure situation with his team already up 2-0 for the series, well, that usually means good things are on the immediate horizon. Like his counterpart this evening, Bailey has no playoff experience, but I just hope he doesn’t really change his currently very confident mindset because that’s what this matchup is all about: Two pitchers who are very confident at this point in time, based on how strong they ended their respective seasons (Especially Vogelsong, having overcome the ugliest stretch he's had since coming back last year), going toe-to-toe. With that reasoning, I’d like to believe it will be solid pitching that dictates this Game 3 affair, as both guys feel comfortable and may not have the nerves that their predecessors had in the earlier games of this series. Yes, the bullpens blew my Game 1 under in the cruelest of ways (Losing an under on a wild pitch with two strikes and two outs in the bottom of the 9th before Buster Posey struck out to end the game. In the top half, there was also a run scored with two outs on a passed ball before Zach Cozart struck out to end the inning), but given how dependable they’ve been over the course of an entire season, we want this under in their hands. If the starters showcase their usual fine pitching, which is more likely with their current psyches, then we’ll indeed get this under to the bullpens, who will hopefully sustain it this time. But let’s get there first before worrying about it, and these two starters, especially at this point in time, are more than capable.


Also Leaning On:
Anibal Sanchez vs Brett Anderson OVER 7


**May Add More Over/Under(s) Throughout Day Leading Up To Gametime**


**Remember that if you have a question concerning an over/under, I will gladly assist you with it if I see it before the game starts, even the ones I don't bet on, as I have at least a small vibe on every single over/under from studying this stuff every single day and night**
 

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
1,342
Tokens
You have under and i want over.Good luck today cats.I have it at 7.5 Homer does not pitch well at home,so im taking a chance on the over.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Messages
6,350
Tokens
Gl Cat, keep em coming, been watching you on foots /bases,thank you for your expertise.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,059
Tokens
Just out of curiosity can you explain the 8 number? I see 8 not currently offered at any book at your time of posting. Currently if you buy the line to 8 the juice is -150 and your bet amout has the juice at -120, which isn't offered anywhere that I can see.

Just my 2 cents.....Making a wager at 8 (even number) is simply betting for a push. If I have a total play that I really like and the line is on a solid number I always buy it down towards my side to get positive juice, which makes a tremendous different on your bankroll over the long haul of a MLB season. If I use your line of 8 under, -120...Buying it down to 7.5 under +110 is a huge difference. If anyone likes the under at 8 and are confident in the play I would recommend to buy the line to 7.5 if you can. Nobody ever should make a MLB total wager that protects themselves against a push. In most sports wagering the 1/2 point the books flutter in front of us almost never comes into play, prolly less than 5% of the time. I am sure "pops" has also agreed with this method in the past in his posts. BOL to you! BTW nice write-up, very informative.

:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
1,412
Tokens
To me a total of 7.5 in that ballpark is more suited for 2 guys that are legit #1 or #2 guys in their respective rotations. Even though Vogelsong had 3 good starts to end the season they were against the Padres (#23 in runs scored in mlb) and LAD (#26 in runs scored in mlb). His location in his run of bad starts was to blame as he left a lot of pitches up and over the middle of the plate. The reds are hitting .312 off of him in 93 ab's while the giants are hitting .294 off bailey in 68 ab's. I have been much more impressed with bailey of late as he has pitched the best of his career in the last couple of months. However, Vogy pitches much better at home while Bailey pitches much better on the road. Although Bailey is more likely to be calm mentally in this game, this is still the first postseason game for both and I would expect both to show some nerves. The over looks like the play to me.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,059
Tokens
To me a total of 7.5 in that ballpark is more suited for 2 guys that are legit #1 or #2 guys in their respective rotations. Even though Vogelsong had 3 good starts to end the season they were against the Padres (#23 in runs scored in mlb) and LAD (#26 in runs scored in mlb). His location in his run of bad starts was to blame as he left a lot of pitches up and over the middle of the plate. The reds are hitting .312 off of him in 93 ab's while the giants are hitting .294 off bailey in 68 ab's. I have been much more impressed with bailey of late as he has pitched the best of his career in the last couple of months. However, Vogy pitches much better at home while Bailey pitches much better on the road. Although Bailey is more likely to be calm mentally in this game, this is still the first postseason game for both and I would expect both to show some nerves. The over looks like the play to me.
Good post. If you are playing the total the over is the play and is backedat the very least by the line move to the under.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
9,807
Tokens
I like em both, however I missed the 8 so I am going to sit this one out. I will be on the A's Tigers over though.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Just out of curiosity can you explain the 8 number? I see 8 not currently offered at any book at your time of posting. Currently if you buy the line to 8 the juice is -150 and your bet amout has the juice at -120, which isn't offered anywhere that I can see.

Just my 2 cents.....Making a wager at 8 (even number) is simply betting for a push. If I have a total play that I really like and the line is on a solid number I always buy it down towards my side to get positive juice, which makes a tremendous different on your bankroll over the long haul of a MLB season. If I use your line of 8 under, -120...Buying it down to 7.5 under +110 is a huge difference. If anyone likes the under at 8 and are confident in the play I would recommend to buy the line to 7.5 if you can. Nobody ever should make a MLB total wager that protects themselves against a push. In most sports wagering the 1/2 point the books flutter in front of us almost never comes into play, prolly less than 5% of the time. I am sure "pops" has also agreed with this method in the past in his posts. BOL to you! BTW nice write-up, very informative.

:103631605

Got it at 8 (-120) as soon as the line came out last night. I've done my routine every single night before the games are played the next day so I always catch the lines when they first come out and take the appropriate action if I feel it is going to change. In this instance, I thought there was no way the line was going to stick (Off the top of my head, I can think of inferior pitching matchups in Cincy this year that had lower lines, such as Blanton vs Arroyo from a few Friday nights ago). Believe me, I have always absolutely WISHED I could buy runs... I'm very jealous you have that ability because it would have saved me so many times this year (Ex. Cueto vs Cain the other night. Would've bought from 6.5 to 7 if I had the chance). I would buy it up to the round number in big bets because it's always worth it, it's been absurd how many half-run losses Ive had this year.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
To me a total of 7.5 in that ballpark is more suited for 2 guys that are legit #1 or #2 guys in their respective rotations. Even though Vogelsong had 3 good starts to end the season they were against the Padres (#23 in runs scored in mlb) and LAD (#26 in runs scored in mlb). His location in his run of bad starts was to blame as he left a lot of pitches up and over the middle of the plate. The reds are hitting .312 off of him in 93 ab's while the giants are hitting .294 off bailey in 68 ab's. I have been much more impressed with bailey of late as he has pitched the best of his career in the last couple of months. However, Vogy pitches much better at home while Bailey pitches much better on the road. Although Bailey is more likely to be calm mentally in this game, this is still the first postseason game for both and I would expect both to show some nerves. The over looks like the play to me.

Very good points that I did take into consideration because a lot of times, I'm more of a human psychology guy than a stat guy (Which is why I read so many quotes and game recaps), hence my fascination with clear prideful pitchers like Bud Norris and Blake Beavan.

I have always shared that same sentiment concerning Great American Ballpark, but I feel like this year, the runs scored there actually went down (Hence Mat Latos' very good home ERA and Bronson Arroyo's unexpected renaissance year). Of course, G.A.B. will always be a clear hitting park, but that doesn't mean there can't be a little bit of a duel between two non-ace pitchers. Vogelsong, for most of those past two years, has pitched like a No. 2 (By the way, despite San Diego's low rankings for the season, they had one of the hottest offenses throughout the entire second half), while the Homer Bailey I've seen lately, despite my past thoughts of him being overrated, looks like a clear cut No. 2 or No. 3 guy.

Just as important, the trick with taking no days off the entire season, and postseason, is you have to pick a game. On the contrary, there could be promise here
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,059
Tokens
Got it at 8 (-120) as soon as the line came out last night. I've done my routine every single night before the games are played the next day so I always catch the lines when they first come out and take the appropriate action if I feel it is going to change. In this instance, I thought there was no way the line was going to stick (Off the top of my head, I can think of inferior pitching matchups in Cincy this year that had lower lines, such as Blanton vs Arroyo from a few Friday nights ago). Believe me, I have always absolutely WISHED I could buy runs... I'm very jealous you have that ability because it would have saved me so many times this year (Ex. Cueto vs Cain the other night. Would've bought from 6.5 to 7 if I had the chance). I would buy it up to the round number in big bets because it's always worth it, it's been absurd how many half-run losses Ive had this year.
Oh ok, just curious. You posted the play this afternoon at 11:03. Usually it's good to post lines that others can receive at the time of posting, just sayin. GL tonight.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Oh ok, just curious. You posted the play this afternoon at 11:03. Usually it's good to post lines that others can receive at the time of posting, just sayin. GL tonight.

Can't argue with that, that's a correct point. But since I always do my routine from 1-4 in the morning the night before, and then sometimes add to the bet leading up to gametime, sometimes with different lines which I note accordingly, I dont get to write about it right away. Since I'm a writer, I have the mentality of a writer, in that my best thoughts and work comes as we rapidly approach gametime/deadline, which is why sometimes certain picks arent posted until minutes before first pitch. I'm always thinking about these pitchers, always waiting until I'm completely sure with a bet

GL with your Giants bet as well, I like the pick
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,059
Tokens
Can't argue with that, that's a correct point. But since I always do my routine from 1-4 in the morning the night before, and then sometimes add to the bet leading up to gametime, sometimes with different lines which I note accordingly, I dont get to write about it right away. Since I'm a writer, I have the mentality of a writer, in that my best thoughts and work comes as we rapidly approach gametime/deadline, which is why sometimes certain picks arent posted until minutes before first pitch. I'm always thinking about these pitchers, always waiting until I'm completely sure with a bet

GL with your Giants bet as well, I like the pick
Totally understand, but if you wagered your play last night as you stated you either need to post the pick with the line you receive with no write-up or wait to post your pick when you write-up is ready so that you post a current line....BOL to you also.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
3,314
Tokens
Now that is dominating an under... but boy, just as myself and someone else in this thread acknowledged, Homer Bailey is, BY FAR, throwing the best ball of his career. Never thought he'd become this consistently great, even over two or so months, but on the contrary, this is his ceiling right now. Even so, I think he can sustain it throughout this postseason with his current level of confidence. Extraordinary stuff from him
 

New member
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
1,412
Tokens
Great call on the under that was about as locked up as an under can be. The ineptitude on offense is reminding me of the 2011 giants
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,223
Messages
13,449,720
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com