Exbookie wants to help the players week 6

Search

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Investment plays 3-4 -$2450.00
Action plays 12-11 +238.00
Total 15-15 -$2212.00
411 system now 4-2


When someone asks what percent of bets a professional sports bettor wins, they expect a quick answer with a big number. They are almost always surprised by the decidedly less than impressive answer they receive.
Many people believe expert bettors win a least 60 percent of their bets. It's understandable that they think that, perhaps, but it's just not true. The difference between the amount of bets won by successful sports bettors and the amount won by chronic losers is relatively very small.
First of all, anyone at all can expect to win about 50 percent of his point-spread bets. The only thing required is to flip a coin and pick a team. Professionals, by comparison, rarely sustain a winning rate higher than 56 or 57 percent, and most often even lower than that.
Non-gamblers find that hard to believe, and they are even more skeptical when told that, for a professional sports bettor, a long term winning rate of 60 percent or more is actually too high.
If you are unfamiliar with pro-sports betting I know that sounds crazy at first, but there is a very simple explanation. If Bettor #1 has five bets on a given day and wins three of them, that's a great winning/percentage of 60 percent and a net profit for the day of (after vigorish) 8/10ths of a unit. Here's the breakdown when risking $100 to win $100 bet........
3 won @ $100 = $300
-2 lost @ $100 = $220
net profit = $80

If Bettor #2 has fourteen bets on that same day and wins eight of them, that's a much poorer winning percentage of 57 percent, but almost twice as much profit for the day.........
8 won @ $800 = $800
-6 lost @ $100 = $660
net profit = $140

Bettor #2 was not necessarily less skilled at picking winners; he may simply have chosen to apply all his advantages, including those with less than a 60 percent expectation. After all, the real goal here is to make money, right? And if the goal is to make money, it is clear which of those two bettors was more successful.
Although there are propositions that do sometimes offer more than a 60 percent expection, (such as the "no-think" over/under system), such high-percentage bets are only a small part of the overall picture. With the break-even point at 53 percent, there is no reason to pass on those propositions with expectations higher than, say, 55 percent.
Over the long term, a small advantage applied over and over is awesomely effective. Any mathematician will tell you that a profit is more assured from two hundred bets with a 55 percent expectation-per-bet than from fifty bets with a 60 percent expectation-per-bet. It's more assured because the more observations, the more likely the results will mirror the expectation. In other words, the more bets laid, the more predictable the outcome. It's one of those laws of probabilities of which successful bettors must be aware. The more bets you place, the more likely you will achieve your winning expectation, or something very close to it.
For a professional bettor, a long term winning percentage of 60 percent of more is too high!
The fact is, professional bettors are more concerned with profit than with establishing an impressive winning percentage, and those two conditions are not always compatible. At a pro level, it is important to apply all your advantages as often as possible; not only the very best of your advantages when they occasionally arise.
The 8 years that I have been at theRX
TOTAL INVESTMENT.194-142 +$154,496.00 THE ONES THAT COUNT 58%


All Plays TOTAL...................... 580-498 +$181,393.00 54%

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?p=9220663#post9220663

I will take 54% any day :dancefool



More to Come

Ace
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
lines for week7

SF -8
BUF -3
MIN -3.5
IND -3.5
HOU -4.5
GB -5.5
CAR PK
NYG xx
NO -2.5
NE -13.5
OAK -3.5
PIT -3
CHI -6.5

AS OF NOW i KNOW MY PLAYS THIS WEEK...NEXT FEW DAYS TO GET A HEAD...WEEK 7 LINES HELP...TIME TO DO SOME HOMEWORK

ACE
 

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
414
Tokens
Ace I see DOCS is touting you as being on "FIRE"! Your 7 unit NFL GOM play will be in this thread correct, after kickoff? Good luck this week.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Ace I see DOCS is touting you as being on "FIRE"! Your 7 unit NFL GOM play will be in this thread correct, after kickoff? Good luck this week.

And it's a 411 play.......two 411 plays this week..one total...one dog....
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Market Report: What Sharps Think in Week Six NFL



Heading into Thursday Night’s Pittsburgh-Tennessee game, the Wise Guys are hoping to bounce back strong after what was largely a disappointing week for them in the NFL. It was a great week for squares, as many favorites won big…particularly in the most hyped TV games. Sportsbooks typically believe that a good week for squares is just a temporary loan, and that the public will lose those short term profits back very quickly.
Let’s see what sharps are thinking in this week’s action. Note that Carolina, Chicago, Jacksonville, and New Orleans all have byes, so we have a 14-game card on tap…

PITTSBURGH AT TENNESSEE: Not much interest here because Pittsburgh is dealing with injuries while Tennessee is dealing with incompetence! Sharps don’t want to lay a line near a TD with a team that couldn’t win at Oakland. The Titans have been so bad outside of the Detroit game that home dog lovers held their noses and turned away. We’re still seeing Pittsburgh -6 at most places. The opening total of 44 has come down to 43 or 43.5 in many spot…suggesting some Wise Guys like the Under. Sharps just aren’t interested, and would likely fade any significant public line moves that might happen before kickoff.

CINCINNATI AT CLEVELAND: The anti-Cincinnati sentiment we saw last week when the Bengals played Miami is present once again here. Cincinnati opened at -3, but is now only -1.5 or -1 as a road favorite vs. their state rival. There’s a group of sharps that were talking about how overrated Cincinnati was back before the season started. They’re really making their presence felt lately in the markets.

INDIANAPOLIS AT NY JETS: This is setting up as a tug-of-war spot near the key number of three. The Colts will get money at 3.5, while the Jets will get money at -3. Sharps aren’t ready to invest in Andrew Luck on the road against a play-making defense unless they’re getting that hook. The public seems to expect a letdown from the Colts off the Packers stunner…which keeps the line from settling right on a field goal. The total is up a point from 42 to 43, which suggests favorable scoring weather this weekend in the New York area.

KANSAS CITY AT TAMPA BAY: Matt Cassel will miss the game for Kansas City, putting Brady Quinn on the firing line. The Chiefs had been playing so badly that this wasn’t seen as an earth-shattering development on the team side. Tampa Bay opened at -3.5, and has now been bet up to -4. Remember how important it is when the market moves AWAY from a critical number. The big impact here has been on the total. An opener of 42.5 is down to 40 or 40.5 because Quinn is seen as less likely to get points on the board in a loss. Sharps have really become aggressive in recent years about betting totals when there’s a quarterback change at both the pro and college levels.

OAKLAND AT ATLANTA: Atlanta opened at -9.5, and moved away from the ten even though Oakland’s been playing so badly this year and this is another bad body clock game. Remember what happened in Miami? This suggests that oddsmakers and sharps think the “real” like is closer to 7.5 or 8. Sportsbooks are hoping the public will lay a bad number on the favorite on game day. Of course, it’s possible that some sharps are moving on Oakland to try and drive the line down into the teaser window at Atlanta -8.5. The whole world would come in on the Falcons in two-point teasers at -2.5…so sportsbooks aren’t very interested in moving to that degree. The deeper you get into the season, the more sportsbooks guard against teasers because sharper lines make teasers a better percentage play.

DALLAS AT BALTIMORE: One of the most anticipated games of the week saw sharp interest on the Cowboys at the opener of +4. We’re seeing +3.5 as we go to press. The Cowboys had a bye last week and are in something close to a must-win situation after their Monday Night loss to Chicago. Baltimore has been inconsistent since that season opening blowout of Cincinnati. The total is down a point from 45 to 44.

DETROIT AT PHILADELPHIA: We’ve seen a big move on the Lions, from an opener of +6.5 down to +4. That tells you that Matthew Stafford is likely to play at full strength off the Lions’bye…and it also tells you how little faith sharps have in Michael Vick at the moment. The Eagles are only playing nailbiters this year (outside of a big loss in Arizona). They won’t get Wise Guy support as chalk until they play well in that role.

ST. LOUIS AT MIAMI: Sharp love for the Dolphins continues this week. Miami opened at -3 vs. St. Louis, suggesting the two were even teams. Sharps hit the hosts and we’re now seeing -3.5. The Wise Guys were prominent in their support for Miami starting back in the Oakland game. They’ve largely been rewarded for that…particularly vs. the Raiders and then last week in Cincinnati. The total is down a half a point from 38 to 37.5. That’s bigger than it seems because 38 is a key total number in projected defensive battles. Moving OFF the 38 in a downward direction suggests strong Under support from those in the know.

NEW ENGLAND AT SEATTLE: New England opened at -4, which might strike some of you as low given their recent blowout performances. But, sharps fell in love with Seattle during the preseason, and have hit the Seahawks here to drive the line down to the hosts +3.5. We’re hearing from our sources that the key is the combination of New England flying cross country after a high profile game and Seattle’s strong defense. Sharps like defensive home underdogs even without bonus intangibles.

BUFFALO AT ARIZONA: Tough call here…because Arizona’s offense has been abysmal this year, making them a shaky take as favorites…but Buffalo has fallen apart in recent weeks. The best way to describe this is that there are competing factions who have light opinions either way. Dog guys will lean away from the lethargic favorite. Math guys see Buffalo’s bad defense and can make a light stat case for the hosts. This will be one of the lightest bet NFL games of the month.

MINNESOTA AT WASHINGTON: This game has largely stayed off the board pending the status of Robert Griffin III as he recovers from a concussion. Midweek news suggested he had a good chance to see the field this weekend. Oddsmakers want certainty because there is a likely drop-off to the backup. We can tell you that sharps are growing more and more impressed with Minnesota by the week…and that they’re less impressed with RGIII now than they were after the New Orleans game to a significant degree.

NY GIANTS AT SAN FRANCISCO: The biggest game of the day is a rematch from the NFC Championship showdown last January. Sharps have been impressed by San Francisco’s offensive balance this year…and have hit the 49ers at -5.5 to drive them up to -6 or -6.5. Note that San Francisco was only -2 in this game in last year’s playoffs…and they LOST that game. That puts the Wise Guys’ respect into better context. They’re REALLY impressed with what they’re seeing from Jim Harbaugh’s team.

GREEN BAY AT HOUSTON: It’s interesting that Houston is also a very respected team amongst sharps…but the line has moved toward Green Bay here in the Sunday Nighter on NBC. Green Bay opened at +5, but it’s down to +3.5 or +4 as we go to press. Why the move away from the Texans? We’re hearing it’s a combination of the short week off their Monday Night win in New York, and the fact that the Packers are in a season-defining spot on the schedule after some early disappointments. Also, though this hasn’t happened often of late…Aaron Rodgers is a good guy to have on the field in a back-door cover situation late in the fourth quarter. It’s harder to beat GREAT quarterbacks by more than a field goal because they can reduce deficits of 8-10 points in the final moments.

DENVER AT SAN DIEGO: Peyton Manning is still getting respect from the Wise Guys. An opener of +3 on Monday Night is already down to +1. That game swung through teaser zone in many places because sportsbooks don’t want bettors taking Manning up to +7.5 or better. There are many sharps who picked Denver over San Diego to win the AFC West before the season started. This is the manifestation of that sentiment…in the first regular season meeting between the teams. Oddsmakers had the teams rated equal…sharps bet who they think is the better neutral field side.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
10
Tokens
3 Dogs I'm going to play this week...

And it's a 411 play.......two 411 plays this week..one total...one dog....

3 Dogs I'm going to play this week...Stl, Indy, Det (love the line movement with first 2)...Do I have the system and Ace with me on one of them? Thoughts?

Ace, it seems like the 411 system has a tendency to pick sides rather than totals...do you have a overall record for 411 total plays?
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
3 Dogs I'm going to play this week...Stl, Indy, Det (love the line movement with first 2)...Do I have the system and Ace with me on one of them? Thoughts?

Ace, it seems like the 411 system has a tendency to pick sides rather than totals...do you have a overall record for 411 total plays?

out of those 3 you have one of DOG that I'm playing this week....the other two show value and one more I would have played if I did not see more value on other games.

There is a part of the 411 system that picks Totals (small part) record 93-57-4....life time
 

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
414
Tokens
And it's a 411 play.......two 411 plays this week..one total...one dog....


Ace is Docs touting your 411 system as a phony? He claims you have a 7 unit NFL play and (2 Total plays that are BOTH 411 plays)! You say one side and one total? Also that record for totals by the 411 system is a touts record, no way thats a true record.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Ace is Docs touting your 411 system as a phony? He claims you have a 7 unit NFL play and (2 Total plays that are BOTH 411 plays)! You say one side and one total? Also that record for totals by the 411 system is a touts record, no way thats a true record.

when they say total...they mean there is 2 411 plays this week....you know a total of two....guess you can take it the other way.....411 plays is only side plays!

if you look back at all my threads I show every play of the 411 sys pick.record are diff at docsports its 93-56-4.....my record that I have showed in every thread is now 95-52-7....thisisbase on where I got the line vs what line I had to posted at docsports...ones that Have follow me the last 4 years know thisis the RECORD.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Ace is Docs touting your 411 system as a phony? He claims you have a 7 unit NFL play and (2 Total plays that are BOTH 411 plays)! You say one side and one total? Also that record for totals by the 411 system is a touts record, no way thats a true record.

you dont think much of touts!!!...but doc been in business for 40 years....I made a misstake a few times and they send me a email the next day and told me to fixit....too many players watch...you cant lie!!!...
 

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
414
Tokens
you dont think much of touts!!!...but doc been in business for 40 years....I made a misstake a few times and they send me a email the next day and told me to fixit....too many players watch...you cant lie!!!...

Ok boss I thought your 93-56-4 record was on totals alone, miss read the post, sorry. Anyhow will you have 2 (411) plays for totals this week like Docs is advertising?
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Ok boss I thought your 93-56-4 record was on totals alone, miss read the post, sorry. Anyhow will you have 2 (411) plays for totals this week like Docs is advertising?

I have two 411 plays...they are SIDES

I only have one total on 1game.....same plays I posted at doc
 

New member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
10
Tokens
3 Dogs I'm going to play this week...Stl, Indy, Det (love the line movement with first 2)...Do I have the system and Ace with me on one of them? Thoughts?

Ace, it seems like the 411 system has a tendency to pick sides rather than totals...do you have a overall record for 411 total plays?

Sorry, I was confused as well thinking that you meant one of the 411 plays was a total. It did seem very odd to me as I was under the impression that they were all side plays. Good luck with this weeks card! Thanks Ace. :toast:
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Network Notebook: Packers-Texans Stat Preview Something to think about

There’s been a bit too much drama already about the Green Bay Packers being on the “verge” of elimination from the playoffs. The media went overboard on the “what if that bad call by a replacement ref keeps the Packers out of the playoffs” bandwagon a few weeks ago after a Monday Night game. And, the doom and gloom after a blown game in Indianapolis features Packers players sniping at each other through the media.
Well, let’s get one thing straight up front. Green Bay is currently 1-0 against NFC Central opponents, and still has FIVE games left against the Bears (1), Vikings (2), and Lions (2). If you win the division, you make the playoffs regardless of what you’re record is. Green Bay controls almost all of its own fate in terms of winning the division given these standings:

NFC CENTRAL
Minnesota 4-1
Chicago 4-1
Green Bay 2-3
Detroit 1-3
Stick two losses on Minnesota, and you bring them back to you while holding the tie-breaker. Stick another loss on Chicago, and you’re within range while owning the tie-breaker. Detroit may or may not be a factor this year. You have a chance to make some hay at their expense.

Also of note:
*Green Bay lost to powerhouse San Francisco. Chicago still has to play them.
*Green Bay could lose to Houston tonight to fall to 2-4. Both Minnesota and Chicago will also have to play Houston though, and this is a year where all three could fall to the Texans.
*Green Bay will be clear favorites the next three weeks over the likes of St. Louis, Jacksonville, and Arizona. That’s followed by a bye week that is well-timed to prepare them for the final seven games.
It’s not “do or die” time for the Packers just yet given how the rest of the season shapes up. The most important factor to US isn’t that they’ve had some bad luck with officiating…or that they’ve lost two heartbreakers in the final seconds. IT’S THAT THEY’RE JUST NOT PLAYING VERY WELL!
The problem in Green Bay isn’t that bad luck is kicking them in the groin. It’s that they’re not doing what it takes to seal the deal against teams that they should be beating. A run through our standard preview numbers will provide a better sense of that.

GREEN BAY PACKERS at HOUSTON TEXANS (8:20 p.m. on NBC)
Las Vegas Spread: Houston by 3.5, total of 48
Even though Houston has been getting a lot of respect from the market this year (and last year when healthy), they’re barely laying over a field goal here…which means oddsmakers and sharps see them as only slightly better than the Packers. Houston would get the bare nod on a neutral field. Green Bay would be a slight favorite at home. Green Bay HAS fallen behind Houston according to most ways of looking at the game right now. If you’re this close to Houston in the Power Ratings though, you’re still in good shape to finish strong and make the playoffs.

WON-LOST RECORDS
Green Bay: 2-3 (vs. San Francisco, vs. Chicago, at Seattle, vs. New Orleans, at Indianapolis)
Houston: 5-0 (vs. Miami, at Jacksonville, at Denver, vs. Tennessee, at NY Jets)
It’s still too early to determine if Green Bay has played a killer schedule or just a decent one. Depending on the week, Chicago and Seattle can look like playoff teams or non-entities. New Orleans is better than its record, even if they’re on a short list of respected underachievers with the Packers. What’s unmistakably obvious is that Green Bay has played a much tougher schedule than Houston. The Packers would likely be at least 4-1 vs. Houston’s schedule. Houston would have had to play at a high and consistent level to go 5-0 against the Packers’ slate. Remember as we go through the numbers that Green Bay has played the tougher schedule.

TURNOVER DIFFERENTIAL
Green Bay: -1
Houston: +8
One of the big hidden issues for Green Bay this year has been on defense in this stat. They forced four turnovers in their win against Chicago…but only ONE combined in their other four games! They’re not getting cheap points off of field position. They’re not killing the hopes of trailing opponents with picks or forced fumbles. The defense has been too passive outside of the night when they embarrassed Jay Cutler in a short preparation week. Houston’s been great in this stat…but it has come against a weak schedule. If they keep winning the risk/reward stuff against better opponents…then we’re looking at a Super Bowl team for sure.

OFFENSIVE STATS
Green Bay: 338.0 yards-per-game on 5.2 yards-per-play
Houston: 371.8 yards-per-game on 5.5 yards-per-play
Wow…that’s WAY too low for a Green Bay team that used to move at will up and down the field. They should be in the high 300’s or low 400’s on a regular basis…and they should be making a run at 6.0 every week. That’s already a potent negative combination…Green Bay’s offense has dropped off from last year, and they’re not getting cheap field position points because the defense doesn’t force turnovers. The offensive stats for Houston may or may not tell the full story. Yes, they’ve played a weak schedule…but they’ve tended to just run clock with a lead…meaning they’re saving bigger production for when it’s needed. Right now, Houston has the better offense in our view.

DEFENSIVE STATS
Green Bay: 344.2 yards-per-game on 5.2 yards-per-play
Houston: 275.6 yards-per-game on 4.8 yards-per-play
The road game at Denver provided the only real test for the Houston defense to this point, and they passed that with flying colors. Let’s see what they do against Aaron Rodgers and company here. For now, Houston has the much better defense. Maybe schedule strength will loom larger than we’re realizing here. But, eyeballing the games and the numbers, Houston gets the nod on both sides of the ball.

LAST WEEK’S BOXES
INDIANAPOLIS 30, GREEN BAY 27
Total Yardage: Green Bay 356, Indianapolis 464
Rushing Yards: Green Bay 141, Indianapolis 119
Passing Stats: Green Bay 21-33-1-215, Indianapolis 31-55-1-345
Turnovers: Green Bay 1, Indianapolis 1
Third Downs: Green Bay 31%, Indianapolis 40%
Vegas Line: Green Bay by 7, total of 48
The Packers built a big first half lead, only to completely lose their focus on both sides of the ball in the second half. The defense wilted. Rodgers kept getting sacked. This was clearly a BLOWN WIN that should never have gone down to the wire. The biggest red flags for us that you see above from the Green Bay perspective are in offensive third downs and defensive turnovers forced. We don’t list sacks…but Rodgers going down five times against what’s basically an expansion team is a big problem indeed. Given that this nailbiter came on the heels of nailbiters against New Orleans and Seattle makes it clear that the Packers have lost a few steps from last year’s juggernaut.

HOUSTON 23, NY JETS 17
Total Yardage: Houston 378, NY Jets 286
Rushing Yards: Houston 169, NY Jets 69
Passing Stats: Houston 14-28-1-209, NY Jets 14-32-2-217
Turnovers: Houston 1, NY Jets 2
Third Downs: Houston 40%, NY Jets 29%
Vegas Line: Houston by 8, total of 41
The Jets had a kickoff return touchdown, which is why Houston failed to cover despite one-sided statistics. You see strength up and down the boxscore there, which is a great sign as a road favorite in a Monday Night game. Execution and focus, outside of the special teams error. Houston’s for real. Or, at least clearly better than all of the 5-11 caliber or worse teams they’ve been facing so far.

BEST EXPECTATION
We’d argue that the math says Houston should be favored by something like 5-6 on their home field given the numbers we’ve just run through…given Green Bay’s issues with forcing turnovers…and given the general flow of the season. Green Bay may be melting down. Houston is in steamroller mode, taking care of business as they try to keep Matt Schaub healthy for the duration. The market has it lower, respecting the potential of what Green Bay hasn’t shown yet…and possibly penalizing Houston for a short preparation week.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
$500.00 -108 Take #214 Tampa Bay (-4) over Kansas City (1 p.m., Sunday, Oct. 14)
Kansas City is one of the worst teams in football. They are coming off a tough game against the Ravens and now are on the road. They are beat up but they are facing a Tampa Bay team that is off of a bye. That is a big advantage for the rested home team. The Chiefs are going with their backup quarterback and I think that this team is close to already quitting on the season. Tampa Bay is a one-win team but they are the favorites here. And the spread on this game has only gone up since it opened at -3.0. The sharp money is pushing this number up. I like the home team.

$600.00-110 Take #211 Indianapolis (+3.5) over New York Jets (1 p.m., Sunday, Oct. 14)
The Jets did not look good on Monday Night Football. There are too many issues in that locker room. And there are too many injuries. This is just not a very good team right now and I don't think they are going to be sharp for this game. I had this game as a 'pick' so I think that there is a lot of value here with the Colts getting above a field goal. This team is young and is improving each week. They were good enough to get a win over Green Bay last week and this team has a lot of motivation as they play for their coach, who has cancer. The wrong team is favored in this one and I expect an outright win for the sinking Jets.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
$800.00 -105 Take #223 New England (-3.5) over Seattle (4 p.m., Sunday, Oct. 14)
This play is from my NFL 411 System.
The Patriots have righted the ship. They are just 3-2 on the season but they are 4-1 ATS with their only loss at the window as the Arizona game. Seattle is always tough at home. But they haven't faced a team as strong as the Patriots. New England is moving the ball in the air and on the ground and this is the best defense that Seattle has seen in the last four weeks. Seattle was not impressive last week against Carolina. And as teams get more tape on Russell Wilson they will figure out ways to get to him. He has been making poor decisions. Bill Belichick is great at confusing rookie quarterbacks. And I am never going to back away from Tom Brady in a situation like this. If anyone can handle this tough road environment it is him. Right now the Patriots are going good and I think they get another double-digit win in this game.



$700.00 -105 Take 'Under' 43.5 Buffalo at Arizona (4 p.m., Sunday, Oct. 14)
The Bills have given up over 600 yards in each of their last two games. These players are still professionals. They will be more focused than ever this week to come back with a strong performance. Arizona does not have a high-powered offense. And this Cardinals offensive line is still reeling after giving up nearly 10 sacks to St. Louis last Thursday. Both teams are going to try to run the ball to protect their quarterbacks. Four out of five Cardinals games have gone 'under'. The Bills have been a strong 'over' wager lately but the books have gone too far with this one. Defense and the running game will dictate this one.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,264
Messages
13,450,051
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com