Virginia -2-110

scottcarter · Nov 10, 2012

they win by 10+ me thinks

good luck boys

zeeman · Nov 10, 2012

That win by Virginia was impossible except for I had Miami on the ML + 110. Virginia took over at thier 12 with 2:38 left and no timeouts. After a 16 play drive that scored TD with .06 left.

How do you run 16 plays in 2:38 with no timeouts?

scottcarter · Nov 10, 2012

can u believe he dropped the 2 point conversion?? Oh well you win some u lose some.

Defying · Nov 10, 2012

can you believe I had the Under 28.5 for 2nd half.... within 5 mins there was a phantom saftey (clearly not in endzone) ... then a make up call on that pass inference on 4th down that would of ended the game... really tired of bad beats....

scottcarter · Nov 10, 2012

Defying said:
can you believe I had the Under 28.5 for 2nd half.... within 5 mins there was a phantom saftey (clearly not in endzone) ... then a make up call on that pass inference on 4th down that would of ended the game... really tired of bad beats....

wow

we both got screwed

zeeman · Nov 10, 2012

scottcarter said:
can u believe he dropped the 2 point conversion?? Oh well you win some u lose some.

No I didn't see game I was following on ESPN. Tough loss for both of us. I was stupid for taking +110 and not + 1.5.

I also had Army +17.5. Rutgers scored 21 points in the last 8 minutes to cover. OH Vay! I had 2 sure winners only to lose both. Very used to it.

When I deposit with you, you may want to give me a 100% FP plus 100% cash and than you can fade me. Would probably be best business decision you ever made!

zeeman · Nov 10, 2012

Defying said:
can you believe I had the Under 28.5 for 2nd half.... within 5 mins there was a phantom saftey (clearly not in endzone) ... then a make up call on that pass inference on 4th down that would of ended the game... really tired of bad beats....

That sucks! Would you ever be on the right end of one of these? Not!

scottcarter said:
can u believe he dropped the 2 point conversion?? Oh well you win some u lose some.

Scott, not that it mattered but you do know if Virginia would have scored with zero time on the clock they wouldn't even attempted an extra point.

scottcarter · Nov 10, 2012

zeeman said:
Scott, not that it mattered but you do know if Virginia would have scored with zero time on the clock they wouldn't even attempted an extra point.

yup I know but they scored with like14 seconds left to go up one. Thenwent for 2, which was the right call but he just dropped it. F#$@!

bigtendominator · Nov 10, 2012

They should have never gone for 2. Up 1 with 6 seconds left, you kneel. London was an idiot. Not enough time for Miami to kick a FG. Terrible decision, what if U returned it for 2?

zeeman · Nov 10, 2012

bigtendominator said:
They should have never gone for 2. Up 1 with 6 seconds left, you kneel. London was an idiot. Not enough time for Miami to kick a FG. Terrible decision, what if U returned it for 2?

You're right. I didn't even think of that.

cutacrossshorty · Nov 11, 2012

Defying said:
there was a phantom saftey (clearly not in endzone) ...

That safety ruling was just hard to believe. Especially after putting the play under review. If there ever was a call where the replay produced clear and irrefutable evidence, that was it. I think I was the only talking about it in the College foots forum. The game recap from the Associated Press even mentioned how bad it was, which is rare.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/qb-rocco-rallies-virginia-past-211058086--ncaaf.html

"Rocco even appeared to get a break that went Virginia's way.

He was called for intentional grounding from the end zone under heavy pressure, giving Miami a safety and the ball with just over 4 minutes to play. Replays showed that Rocco was not in the end zone when he threw the ball away, but a review did not overturn the call."