Looks like Bonds, Clemens, and Sosa don't have the votes for HOF.

Search

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
AP survey: Bonds, Clemens likely miss in Hall vote

NEW YORK (AP) Baseball's all-time home run king and its most decorated pitcher likely will be shut out of the Hall of Fame in January. A survey by The Associated Press shows that Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, as well as slugger Sammy Sosa, don't have enough votes to get into Cooperstown.

With steroid scandals still very much on the minds of longtime members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America as they cast their ballots, the trio failed to muster even 50 percent support among the 112 voters contacted by the AP - nearly one-fifth of those eligible to choose.Candidates need 75 percent for election.

So Bonds, the only seven-time MVP, and Clemens, the only seven-time Cy Young Award winner, are likely to remain outside the Hall along with career hits leader Pete Rose, who was banned for betting on baseball as manager of the Cincinnati Reds.

"I'm not going to vote for anybody who has been tainted or associated with steroids," said MLB.com's Hal Bodley, the former baseball columnist for USA Today. "I'm just not going to do it. I might change down the road, but I just love the game too much. I have too much passion for the game and for what these people did to it."

The current ballot was announced this week and Bonds, Clemens and Sosa were on it for the first time. Votes will be cast throughout the month and results will be released Jan. 9.

Among voters who expressed an opinion, Bonds received 45 percent support, Clemens 43 percent and Sosa 18 percent. To gain election, Bonds and Clemens would need more than 80 percent support among the voters not surveyed and Sosa would need to get more than 85 percent.

"No one would dare say that Bonds, a seven-time National League MVP with 762 home runs, isn't a Hall of Famer," Thom Loverro, a columnist for The Washington Examiner, wrote in a column that explained his decision. "Nor would anyone say that Clemens, with 354 career victories, 4,672 strikeouts and seven Cy Young Awards, shouldn't be enshrined in Cooperstown. The same goes for Sosa, who finished with 609 career home runs, including 243 of them from 1998 through 2001.

"Except they cheated - all of them. And this Hall of Fame is not just about numbers. Three of the six criteria for election to Cooperstown are sportsmanship, integrity and character. Bonds, Sosa and Clemens fail on all three counts."
The Denver Post's Troy Renck doesn't plan to vote for them, either.

"I understand that everyone has their opinion on this issue and I respect those," he said in a telephone interview. "For me personally, having coached kids for the last decade and talked to them about doing things a certain way, I would feel very uncomfortable voting for anyone that is a known cheater."

San Francisco Chronicle columnist Bruce Jenkins took the opposite view.
"The Hall of Fame's `character' clause should be stricken immediately, because it's far too late to turn Cooperstown into a church," he wrote in an email. "Whether it was gambling (rampant in the early 20th century), scuffing the baseballs, corking bats, amphetamines or steroids, players have been cheating like crazy forever. It's an integral, if unsavory, part of the culture. I've always had the same criteria: which players were the best performers of their particular era - so absolutely, I'll vote for Bonds, Clemens and Sosa."

Bonds and Clemens gained far more support than Sosa in the survey.
"I will definitely vote for Bonds and Clemens. I still need to consider Sosa's resume," ESPN.com's Jim Caple said. "Steroid use has nothing to do with my vote. Steroids were not banned during the majority of their careers when they achieved the vast majority of their accomplishments. All we can go by is what they did on the field. If Gaylord Perry is in the Hall for violating a rule that was in place 40 years before his career began, how can you justify withholding a vote from someone for a rule that wasn't in effect? (And personally, I would rather face a pitcher on PEDs than a spitballer)."
Hall voters are BBWAA members who have been with the organization for 10 consecutive years at any point. The BBWAA does not release the full list.

About 8-10 percent of the approximately 600 Hall of Fame voters are employees of the AP or freelance writers who work for the AP, the BBWAA said.

The AP contacted known voters by telephone and email from Wednesday to Friday. They were asked only how they would vote on Bonds, Clemens and Sosa: yes, no or unsure. About half asked not to be identified, and only those who agreed to be identified by name are quoted in this story.

Bonds has denied knowingly using steroids. A positive test was introduced as evidence during his criminal trial last year, when he was convicted of obstruction of justice by a jury that failed to reach a verdict on charges he made false statements to a grand jury when he denied knowing using performance-enhancing drugs.

Clemens has repeatedly denied drug use and was acquitted this year on charges he lied to Congress when he said he didn't take steroids or human growth hormone.

Sosa was among the 104 positive tests in baseball's 2003 anonymous survey, The New York Times reported in 2009. He told a congressional committee in 2005 that he never took illegal performance-enhancing drugs.

Bonds and Clemens fared far better in the survey than Mark McGwire did when a sample of voters were questioned by the AP before his first appearance on the ballot in December 2006. The slugger with 583 home runs received 24 percent support in the survey and 23.5 percent in the BBWAA ballot.

Since then, McGwire's support has never topped 24 percent and dropped to 19.5 percent of the 573 votes cast last January.

Rafael Palmeiro, who topped 3,000 hits and 500 home runs, was suspended for 10 days in 2005 following a positive test for Stanozolol - he said he didn't know what caused it. He received 12.5 percent in January.
Several voters said their decisions were for this vote only and they planned to reassess their position each year. Some said that they wouldn't consider voting for Bonds, Clemens or Sosa this year because they didn't want them to have the additional honor of being elected on their first ballot.

Players who have appeared in 10 seasons and have been retired for five years are eligible for consideration by a six-member BBWAA screening committee, and a player goes on the ballot if he is supported by at least two screening committee members. A player remains on the ballot for up to 15 elections as long as he gets 5 percent of the votes every year.

Ballots must be submitted to the BBWAA by Dec. 31. Inductions will take place July 28.
Voters were contacted by telephone and email from Wednesday to Friday.
Craig Biggio, Mike Piazza and Curt Schilling also are among the 24 first-time eligibles, and Jack Morris, Jeff Bagwell and Tim Raines are the top holdover candidates.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
So now the alltime hits leader, the all time home run leader, and perhaps the best or at worst 2nd best pitcher of the last 50 years is not in the HOF.

You know what that makes the HOF?

Irrelevant
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
So now the alltime hits leader, the all time home run leader, and perhaps the best or at worst 2nd best pitcher of the last 50 years is not in the HOF.

You know what that makes the HOF?

Irrelevant

Man, we just disagree on everything. They don't get to those numbers without cheating the game.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
LOL
You aren't kidding.
Im not in the mood for another 10 page thread.
One ten page thread a day for us.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
LOL
You aren't kidding.
Im not in the mood for another 10 page thread.
One ten page thread a day for us.

Are you telling me Bonds breaks the single season record without being on roids? I'd love for you to make that argument.

A juiced up Bonds against Jesse Orosco. Good one.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
2,733
Tokens
So now the alltime hits leader, the all time home run leader, and perhaps the best or at worst 2nd best pitcher of the last 50 years is not in the HOF.

You know what that makes the HOF?

Irrelevant

Once again Chop, I agree. Just because Pete didn't admit gambling shouldn't preclude the fact he was all time hits leader and a hall of fame player. Bonds was the best player in baseball before he ever took a roid. Clemens was truly a hall of famer if he would have retired before he took any steroids. I can't stand Bonds and I'm not a huge fan of Clemens either but they were hall of famers.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
Just for arguments sake cy, who should be held accountable for their decision to go ahead and use them? As far as Rose is concerned, he did admit he gambled while he was the manager. He also made the decision to sign the agreement banning himself for consideration from the HOF.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
9,853
Tokens
Man, we just disagree on everything. They don't get to those numbers without cheating the game.

"Except they cheated - all of them. And this Hall of Fame is not just about numbers. Three of the six criteria for election to Cooperstown are sportsmanship, integrity and character. Bonds, Sosa and Clemens fail on all three counts."

Agr
ee 100%

end of story.......
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
"Except they cheated - all of them. And this Hall of Fame is not just about numbers. Three of the six criteria for election to Cooperstown are sportsmanship, integrity and character. Bonds, Sosa and Clemens fail on all three counts."

Agr
ee 100%

end of story.......

and there is no one in the HOF that ever cheated right?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,303
Tokens
Once again to anyone who wants to bring up the alleged cheating, show us the proof that they actually did? Oh yeah that is right, no one has yet to produce such evidence & instead of going off of facts, it is based off of public opinion. Also when these guys played, were the substances they were alleged to have used actually illegal according to MLB rules?
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
8,229
Tokens
Once again to anyone who wants to bring up the alleged cheating, show us the proof that they actually did? Oh yeah that is right, no one has yet to produce such evidence & instead of going off of facts, it is based off of public opinion. Also when these guys played, were the substances they were alleged to have used actually illegal according to MLB rules?


This.

Especially Clemens. No balco, no failed tests, no calendar like bonds had, nobody in jail because they wouldn't testify.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
20,483
Tokens
Hall of Fame has been a joke since the day they didn't let Pete Rose in.


If I was these guys I would laugh it off, everyone knows they are true Hall of Famers.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
2,944
Tokens
"Except they cheated - all of them. And this Hall of Fame is not just about numbers. Three of the six criteria for election to Cooperstown are sportsmanship, integrity and character. Bonds, Sosa and Clemens fail on all three counts."

Agr
ee 100%

end of story.......

Yet Gaylord Perry is in the HOF. I remember watching games when he was pitching, the announcers would try to figure out where he was hiding the substance to help him throw spitters. It was well known that he cheated in every one of his victories, but thats ok I guess. How about all the guys, and there were countless ones, that took amphetamines before games? Do you really think that Mickey Mantle didnt need the help of a pill to help him play day games after being out all night? (I only use Mantle as an example because of his HOF drinking career.) I dont care whether any of these guys get in, the HOF has always been a joke, but its just so hypocritical.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
Once again to anyone who wants to bring up the alleged cheating, show us the proof that they actually did? Oh yeah that is right, no one has yet to produce such evidence & instead of going off of facts, it is based off of public opinion. Also when these guys played, were the substances they were alleged to have used actually illegal according to MLB rules?
Actually they were considered illegal but the problem is there was no testing then so no one knows for sure who was doping and who wasn't. MLB fucked up plain and simple and now they are paying the price because their coveted HOF has become a joke to many.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
2,733
Tokens
Greenies, cocaine, and pot are illegal substances too and there are plenty of people in hall of fame who used and the MLB knew they did and they are still in Hall of Fame.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
4,468
Tokens
Who gives a rats ass anymore. The HOF is worthless at this point. Professional sports today are only good for one thing and that is getting a wager down on them.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Once again Chop, I agree. Just because Pete didn't admit gambling shouldn't preclude the fact he was all time hits leader and a hall of fame player. Bonds was the best player in baseball before he ever took a roid. Clemens was truly a hall of famer if he would have retired before he took any steroids. I can't stand Bonds and I'm not a huge fan of Clemens either but they were hall of famers.

This
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,644
Messages
13,453,254
Members
99,428
Latest member
callgirls
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com