Teed off: Golf star Phil Mickelson may bolt California over taxes

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,237
Tokens
For golf legend Phil Mickelson, the low 60s makes for a great score on the links — and a lousy tax rate in his home state of California.
Mickelson said “drastic changes” are ahead for him due to federal and California state tax increases that have pushed his tax rate to what he figures adds up to “62, 63 percent.” The left-hander will talk more about his plans — possibly moving out of California or even retiring altogether — before his hometown Farmers Insurance Open, the San Diego-area event that begins Thursday at Torrey Pines.
"It's been an interesting off-season," Mickelson, 42, said Sunday after the final round of the Humana Challenge. "And I'm going to have to make some drastic changes. I'm not going to jump the gun and do it right away, but I will be making some drastic changes."
[pullquote]
Mickelson, who lives in Rancho Santa Fe, is unsure exactly what he’ll do, but changes will come, he said. If he bolts California, the San Diego native could be the Golden State's answer to actor Gerard Depardieu, who renounced his French citizenship and moved to Russia after the French government tried to jack up taxes on the rich.
“There are going to be some drastic changes for me because I happen to be in that zone that has been targeted both federally and by the state and, you know, it doesn't work for me right now,” he said. “So I'm going to have to make some changes."
California voters in November approved Proposition 30, which, in addition to raising the state sales tax, carries a menu of new tax brackets that hit millionaires like Mickelson hard. For income exceeding $1 million, the state rate jumped to 13.3 percent from 10.3 percent. For Mickelson, who earned roughly $60 million in 2012, that would be a tax increase of more than $1.8 million.
"If you add up all the federal and you look at the disability and the unemployment and the Social Security and the state, my tax rate's 62, 63 percent," Mickelson said. "So I've got to make some decisions on what I'm going to do."
Mickelson, who flirted with becoming part owner of the San Diego Padres last year, said there was “absolutely” a correlation between the tax increases and the eventual failure to grab a piece of the Padres franchise, which ultimately sold for $800 million in August.
Mickelson, whose net worth is conservatively reported at more than $150 million, finished with a 66 on Sunday to tie for 37th at 17 under in his season debut. The Hall of Famer — nicknamed “Lefty” for his big left-handed swing — has 40 PGA Tour victories, including four majors, and his career earnings exceed $67 million, according to PGA statistics.
Mickelson, according to Sports Illustrated, was the second-highest earning athlete of 2012, second only to boxing’s Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Mickelson, who was also second on the list in 2011, earned $3.7 million in winnings and $57 million in endorsements last year — for a staggering total of $60,763,488.
Details of Mickelson’s several endorsement deals — including partnerships with Callaway, Barclays and Rolex to name a few — are unknown, and his real estate holdings and other business ventures are not included in the Sports Illustrated tally.
Mayweather, by comparison, earned $85 million last year during just two fights and without any endorsement deals.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.



 

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
8,798
Tokens
Good for him! But the rich don't pay their "fair share"! If 63% isn't enough then what is?
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Poor Phil. Now he's only going to make $8 million out of his $20 million dollar endorsement deal. How is he going to eat?
 

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
8,465
Tokens
fvck phil....

the guy NEVER HAD A REAL JOB....EVER

EVER..................................
 

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
8,798
Tokens
Poor Phil. Now he's only going to make $8 million out of his $20 million dollar endorsement deal. How is he going to eat?

Thats not the point. No one in this country should pay that tax rate. He could get in a car crash and never play another round of golf ever again. His income would drop significantly.

And for most people, having a high income does not make you "rich". Since we are discussing "athletes", an NFL athlete making $350k playing special teams gets cut and he's gotta find a real job like the rest of us. He's not "rich"....but he had a nice income for a few years. Now he doesn't make shit....but he paid 39% income tax because he's considered "rich".
 

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2011
Messages
4,122
Tokens
Im far from a Phil guy and really cant stand his little ways of seeking attention, like this for example, but id be pretty pissed off if 63% of my income was taken by taxes too
 

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
4,209
Tokens
Im far from a Phil guy and really cant stand his little ways of seeking attention, like this for example, but id be pretty pissed off if 63% of my income was taken by taxes too

You say this because you work hard for your money.

Not saying Phil doesn't work hard in the golf tournaments in which he competes in.

However Phil's big money comes in from stupid sponsorships where he has to do barely anything but show his face in front of a camera for a 1/2 hour.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
I can guarantee you that he winds up in Vegas. No state taxes and no inheritance taxes.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Thats not the point. No one in this country should pay that tax rate. He could get in a car crash and never play another round of golf ever again. His income would drop significantly.

And for most people, having a high income does not make you "rich". Since we are discussing "athletes", an NFL athlete making $350k playing special teams gets cut and he's gotta find a real job like the rest of us. He's not "rich"....but he had a nice income for a few years. Now he doesn't make shit....but he paid 39% income tax because he's considered "rich".
The average NFL player has a playing career of only 5 years. It's not a 30 year job and retire. They know what they are getting into when they join the league. If a player gets cut after a couple years in the league, if he doesn't have a contigency plan the last thing he should blame is the taxman. As for Mickelson, he is a California rich kid that was born with a silver spoon. He went to college and won his first tournament as an ametuer. He's never had to work a day in his life. Just swing a club and promote arthritis drugs.

He's now going public and bitching about his 60+ percent tax bracket income, and wants us to feel sorry for him because now he can't purchase the San Diego Padres..Boo hoo hoo. If he doesn't want to make that much money and pay the taxes, then he can get rid of that miserable high paying job and take one making $35,000 a year. Then he'll be able to sleep at night, and won't have those burdensome worries. You'll never see me feeling sorry for the 7th highest paid athlete in the world. His getting on TV and bitching about his "tax problem" was about as weak as it comes.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
7,703
Tokens
I don't even think he is paying 60%.....Warren Buffett makes way more than him and pays somewhere in the 20's and Romney paid somewhere in the teens recently....Phil should worry more about finding the loopholes in the system to pay a lower rate like many wealthy do instead of crying to the public
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Phil does not pay 62%. The top tax rate is 39.6% and CA is 13.3. SS and Medicare is minimal for him as its on the first $100k or so. Medicare may be 1% above that. Anyways, he's closer to 53%. Thats if he has no investments. His investments are around 20% so he's likely more like 40% overall. Anyways, there is no reason for a professional golfer to live in CA.

Oh, and he's likely only paying CA taxes on CA income. As much as he travels, he likely pays other states which are lower when he plays out of CA.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,877
Tokens
I don't even think he is paying 60%.....Warren Buffett makes way more than him and pays somewhere in the 20's and Romney paid somewhere in the teens recently....Phil should worry more about finding the loopholes in the system to pay a lower rate like many wealthy do instead of crying to the public

Yeah, I doubt he has an accountant - um, his income is all ordinary income and not capital gains so he has no choice but to pay the 40% federal tax and then California taxes him an additional 13.3% - dude needs to move to Nevada or Florida ASAP - 60% plus in taxes and I would renounce my citizenship
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
This is the same guy who has stiffed a couple sportsbooks in Costa Rica...

Love his golf, but he can go to hell....Big Stiff!
 

Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
982
Tokens
This is the same guy who has stiffed a couple sportsbooks in Costa Rica...

Love his golf, but he can go to hell....Big Stiff!
True, true, and true, but he'd be pretty stupid to stay in cailfornia when with his wealth he can live like a king anywhere. Cailfornia's tax increases will cause this to be repeated thousands of times, even middle class people are bailing to oregon and nevada.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
1,181
Tokens
Why doesn't he just purchase a home in Monte Carlo....That is what most people in his situation do or at least should do. Many tennis players do because they earn money overseas. He will be playing at least 3 tourneys overseas.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,773
Tokens
Why doesn't he just purchase a home in Monte Carlo....That is what most people in his situation do or at least should do. Many tennis players do because they earn money overseas. He will be playing at least 3 tourneys overseas.

I'm pretty sure he is a US citizen, and the IRS doesn't care where he lives or where he buys a house, if he's a US citizen and earns money he has to pay US taxes no matter where he lives.

most US citizens can't afford to pay their fair share of taxes, that is why we have to over tax the wealthy.

I think we would have to tax every US citizen 110% of their earned income in order to pay for government expenditures.

the Rich are the minority, they are outnumbered. All they can do is keep running like slaves until they just give up and either give it all to the government or just quit making money all together.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
5,621
Tokens
Terrible pr move, no one is going to feel sorry for him. I guess we just didn't know how togh Phil has it
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,637
Messages
13,453,163
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com