For future help you can post in my free streams thread (although the royal rumble would have worked in post 1's links )i just reported this post instead of making a thread and asking if a mod was on duty
Adding:
Field wins Royal Rumble (except Cena) +1200 (end of broadcast)
D. Ziggler wins Royal Rumble +1500 (end of broadcast)
Ryback wins Royal Rumble +2500 (end of broadcast)
R. Orton wins Royal Rumble +2000 (end of broadcast)
I wish they had odds on Sheamus as he was scheduled to win when plans were first discussed. His name was on the last list I was told about but that was a little over a week ago.
What does end of broadcast mean compared to the regular lines?
They changed their policy after the debacle at Wrestlemania a few years ago when people complained about wagers being graded losers because the side they had initially lost but then the match was reversed or restarted & their side ended up winning after.
So they have 2 lines now, initial winner & end of broadcast. So let's say CM Punk beats Rock initially and is declared the winner at ringside but then the match gets restarted and The Rock ends up winning, those who wagered on Punk to win initially would be graded winners & those like myself who wagered on end of broadcast would be graded as losers.
Adding:
Field wins Royal Rumble (except Cena) +1200 (end of broadcast)
D. Ziggler wins Royal Rumble +1500 (end of broadcast)
Ryback wins Royal Rumble +2500 (end of broadcast)
R. Orton wins Royal Rumble +2000 (end of broadcast)
I wish they had odds on Sheamus as he was scheduled to win when plans were first discussed. His name was on the last list I was told about but that was a little over a week ago.
(<)<So let's say CM Punk beats Rock initially and is declared the winner at ringside but then the match gets restarted and The Rock ends up winning, those who wagered on Punk to win initially would be graded winners & those like myself who wagered on end of broadcast would be graded as losers.