Amazing stuff happening in the MLB Forum today...

Skyla and Boutmymoney who were both EXCELLENT last year... Combined 9-1 today on MLB, granted all 3 of skyla's plays overlapped... but still impressive, sure theres even more to add to that...

I really want to find a service to fade because I know there are services that only sell MLB to make money and don't know enough or do the work to actually make money in the sport. Any suggestions on that end, but until then looks like im riding with Skyla and BMM

3-0 here as well today. however, I may turn into the fade you're looking for...lol.

Good stuff... Maybe we should re-title this thread in a way we can keep up with who's doing what in MLB section all season long

You really cant fade touts and make money unless you hit a streak. If they could consistently pick losers they would be as good as winners. They will always run about 50/50 like most losers (me)..

I'm your fade. 0-4 today in MLB. Me and my kennel forgot how to bark over the offseason.

ProPokerPlayer said:

You really cant fade touts and make money unless you hit a streak. If they could consistently pick losers they would be as good as winners. They will always run about 50/50 like most losers (me)..

Click to expand...

who said anything about touts brah?

these are RX posters :toast:

-murph

explanation by buffettgambler on why its not profitable to fade someone:

Assuming fades exists is banking on at least one of follow bold assumptions
1.) There is someone that out there that has no edge but influence on market prices. The influence would have to be large enough to circumvent vig. Betting against there moves would then be profitable.

2.) There is someone that has a methodology for picking games, and incorporated within that methodology is something not reflected within market prices. That variable(s) is being used opposite of how it should. Assuming there exists someone that falls within this guideline, that person, despite losing money, keeps their methodology static to where they can actually be faded.

3.) There are pickers out there that don't have a specific methodology, but just by chance, happen to consistently identify games with inefficient market pricing (at a high enough rate to picking efficiently priced games to circumvent aggregate vig), and just by chance pick the wrong side more often than not.