https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai8y0VjQSNzcdFNvRktWS3FVVUcxVXFzZTJibTVtcnc#gid=0
I'm playing all 5 qualifiers for Thursday:
Cubs (Jackson) -116
Reds/Nationals Under 7.5
Rays (Hellickson) +121
Twins (Worley) +118
Angels (Richards) -135
Don't forget the 1st 5 innings.
Qualified plays are GREEN against ORANGE, and BLUE against RED.
So far, GREEN vs ORANGE have been hitting at a higher rate than BLUE vs RED. Especially if the qualified play is an underdog -- there has been major value on the Reverse Run-Line.
On the other hand, be leery of qualified plays that are public favorites. This is why we need to keep a tab of the percentages on the sides. They might not be true numbers regarding moneys but the praxis is to be aware of what side is a public bet.
The algorithm of GREEN underdogs against ORANGE favorites have been overwhelming good hits; especially if you can get Reverse Run-Lines.
I'm playing all 5 qualifiers for Thursday:
Cubs (Jackson) -116
Reds/Nationals Under 7.5
Rays (Hellickson) +121
Twins (Worley) +118
Angels (Richards) -135
Don't forget the 1st 5 innings.
Qualified plays are GREEN against ORANGE, and BLUE against RED.
So far, GREEN vs ORANGE have been hitting at a higher rate than BLUE vs RED. Especially if the qualified play is an underdog -- there has been major value on the Reverse Run-Line.
On the other hand, be leery of qualified plays that are public favorites. This is why we need to keep a tab of the percentages on the sides. They might not be true numbers regarding moneys but the praxis is to be aware of what side is a public bet.
The algorithm of GREEN underdogs against ORANGE favorites have been overwhelming good hits; especially if you can get Reverse Run-Lines.
