PHIL IVEY won £7.8 million in a game of chance by ‘reading’ the backs of the cards, claim the owners of Britain’s oldest casino, who are refusing to p

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,790
Tokens
[h=1]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-deck-design-given-poker-star-upper-hand.html

Gambler won £7.8m by 'reading' the back of cards: How tiny flaw in deck design could have given poker star the upper hand [/h]
  • Phil Ivey is accused of 'reading' the cards in a game based purely on luck
  • Mr Ivey’s winnings were withheld by Mayfair casino Crockfords
  • He insists he did nothing illegal in a game of punto banco
By Ian Gallagher
PUBLISHED:16:04 EST, 11 May 2013| UPDATED:16:04 EST, 11 May 2013
article-2323122-19AE1DE3000005DC-846_306x426.jpg
Top gambler: Multi-millionaire Mr Ivey, 36, has been dubbed ¿the Tiger Woods of poker¿

One of the world’s top gamblers won £7.8 million in a game of chance by ‘reading’ the backs of the cards, claim the owners of Britain’s oldest casino, who are refusing to pay out.

Phil Ivey, dubbed ‘the Tiger Woods of poker’, is understood to have exploited tiny flaws in the card design during a game of punto banco, a type of baccarat based purely on luck.

He insists he did nothing illegal, however, and is suing Mayfair club Crockfords in the High Court in what is expected to be the biggest legal battle in casino history.

The technique has echoes of Kaleidoscope, a 1966 film starring Warren Beatty as a playboy who breaks into a card manufacturer to mark the cards and then beat the bank at every European casino.

The Mail on Sunday, which revealed last October that Mr Ivey’s winnings had been withheld, understands the cards were flawed because of a mistake during the cutting process at an overseas manufacturing plant.

Crucially, it meant their geometric pattern was not symmetrical, though this would not have been noticeable to the untrained eye.
Cards should look exactly the same if turned 180 degrees. If they do not, it allows so-called advantage players to use a system known as ‘playing the turn’.


Multi-millionaire Mr Ivey, 36, was accompanied by an unidentified Chinese woman and was the only person playing against the croupier over three nights at the exclusive Mayfair club last August.
[h=4]More...[/h]

His remarkable winning streak was witnessed by a casino inspector and ten video cameras.
Initially gambling £50,000 per hand, which can be over in less than a minute, he was later given permission by the management to increase his stake to £150,000.

It is thought his companion, who is banned from at least two casinos around the world, was also able to spot the imperfections and helped Mr Ivey place his bets. Like Mr Ivey, she lives in Las Vegas.


article-2323122-19BB5386000005DC-723_634x499.jpg

Along with two others, she is said to have won more than $1 million in similar fashion in the US in 2011, but the money was similarly withheld and the casino’s decision was later upheld by a gaming commission.

It is not clear if Mr Ivey and the woman heard about the rogue cards at Crockfords before arranging the punto banco game or simply noticed them while playing.

Punto banco is the sister game of chemin de fer, the high-stakes card game favoured by James Bond.

The aim is to hold cards with a count of nine or closest to nine. You bet that either the hand held by the player (punto) or banker/croupier (banco) will win and place bets on the appropriate area on the table. Tens and picture cards and multiples of ten count as zero.

Though Mr Ivey was not allowed to touch the cards at any point, he is thought to have instructed the dealer to tilt each card back to expose its value.


article-2323122-19BB5376000005DC-34_634x328.jpg
Break the bank: Warren Beatty in Kaleidoscope about a marked-card scam

The key cards he was looking out for were nines and eights, and possibly sevens and sixes. When these cards appeared, his companion asked for them to be rotated 180 degrees, pretending that Mr Ivey was superstitious.

As this appeared to give him no advantage, the dealer acquiesced.

The rotated cards were returned to the shoe and were easily recognised by the player as different when they were eventually re-dealt, giving him a strong edge. At first, his losses were heading towards £500,000 but he recovered, and at the end of the first night was £2.3 million up. He is also thought to have persuaded the casino not to destroy the cards at the end of each session, which is normal practice.

By ‘holding the shoe’ his rotated cards were preserved for the following day’s play.

The 184-year-old casino, the oldest private gaming club in the world, initially agreed to transfer his winnings to his bank account, but nine months on it has returned only his £1 million stake. Crockfords is owned by Genting, a Malaysian gaming corporation, which sent investigators to London to question employees and scrutinise hours of CCTV footage.

Willy Allison, a leading casino suveillance specialist, warned the gaming industry about flawed cards in November 2011.

He described their exploitation as the ‘latest scam to hit Las Vegas casinos’, adding: ‘Not every player who wins a lot of money at the casino is a cheat. You don’t have to be.


article-2323122-19ADD26F000005DC-723_634x466.jpg
Legal battle: Crockfords casino in Mayfair is being sued by Phil Ivey after he played there for three nights last August

‘By turning an asymmetrical card 180 degrees it is possible to identify what the value of the card is before it is revealed. You simply glance at the edges on the back of the card.

‘Essentially, playing the turn has the same effect as marking the cards and gives players a huge house edge.

‘Who needs invisible ink and red-tinted sunglasses when you’ve got manufacturer-made “marked cards”.’

Mr Allison said casino card manufacturers are under pressure to produce more and more cards, mainly due to massive demand in Macau where millions are used — and destroyed at the end of each session — every day.

‘Inevitably quality control goes down because of this,’ he said last night. ‘Casino management should be vigilant when it comes to manufacturer defects and flaws.’

Mr Ivey said: ‘I was given a receipt for my winnings but Crockfords has withheld payment. I have no alternative but to take legal action.’

A spokesman for Crockfords said: ‘We shall be defending this claim vigorously.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...iven-poker-star-upper-hand.html#ixzz2T1smNmwf
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,615
Tokens
An absolute crock of shit; even if they were flawed cards, it's on the casino and not him. They should pay up.
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
This is bs. I mean if you went and did this for $100 per hand, I could see taking advantage of the dealer, but when you are betting hundreds of thousands per hand they have a dealer and like 8 pitbosses and probably an owner or whatever watching. If these people were too stupid to get new cards every few shoes or kept them overnight it is their problem. They got beat.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
5,621
Tokens
This went on more than a day? This has got yo be the stupidest casino ever. They need to pay up . If they didn't say anything then it just sounds like sour grapes to me.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Interesting. So, this woman did this before and the money was not given to her either? Usually i am against the casions because i like to see them get hit......but i can see why they will not pay. This was not gambling. Ivey knew the cards. I dont think he will get paid.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
6,106
Tokens
Where does it say that he cannot ask to have the cards rotated? The casino chose the cards to use for the game and no one at anytime changed the cards. Leads me to feel that Ivey was just doing a better job than the casino to put the odds in his favor, the casino fucked up and should have to be paid by someone that beat them at their own 'game'.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
He was with a known cheater, asking the dealer to rotate the cards 180*, and convinced them to continue using the same cards when they normally would have destroyed them.

He won't see a dime of that money.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
6,106
Tokens
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:TargetScreenSize>1024x768</o:TargetScreenSize> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:punctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> I believe something similar to this situation occurred in AC a few years ago, but on a much smaller scale. A group of players took the casino for around $2M due to faulty cards. The players won something crazy like 40 consecutive hands. The casino refused to pay and they went to court.

The casino argued there is an equal expectation of a fair game by both parties and the players argued they had no previous knowledge of the faulty deck and still took a chance with every bet. The courts ruled in favor of the players because they had no hand in the deck being faulty and that it’s the casino’s responsibility to ensure the deck was legal.

The casino paid up and went after the card manufacturer to recoup some/all of the losses. I think that suit is still in the courts. I’m not sure if the presence of a known cheat, if that is accurate, changes this dynamic at all.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,615
Tokens
Don't know why they're calling the chick a "known cheat" because even if they did what was alleged, it's not cheating. No different than the blackjack dealer inadvertantly showing their under card and creating a huge advantage for the player; it's all on the casino.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
1,946
Tokens
Very smart by Ivy, very dumb by the casino. Obviously he's asking to rotate them because it's an advantage! I want to see pics of this Chinese mistress. I got $10 that she's smoking hot.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,209
Tokens
Very smart by Ivy, very dumb by the casino. Obviously he's asking to rotate them because it's an advantage! I want to see pics of this Chinese mistress. I got $10 that she's smoking hot.


if she's there to help cheat looks don't matter
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
1,912
Tokens
The key cards he was looking out for were nines and eights, and possibly sevens and sixes. When these cards appeared, his companion asked for them to be rotated 180 degrees, pretending that Mr Ivey was superstitious.

As this appeared to give him no advantage, the dealer acquiesced.

The rotated cards were returned to the shoe and were easily recognised by the player as different when they were eventually re-dealt, giving him a strong edge.


unless i'm misunderstanding, this part makes no sense. in this game (like BJ or any other shoe game), are the used cards not reshuffled after the shoe has been gone through? i've never seen used cards go immediately back into a shoe before being reshuffled.
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
The key cards he was looking out for were nines and eights, and possibly sevens and sixes. When these cards appeared, his companion asked for them to be rotated 180 degrees, pretending that Mr Ivey was superstitious.

As this appeared to give him no advantage, the dealer acquiesced.

The rotated cards were returned to the shoe and were easily recognised by the player as different when they were eventually re-dealt, giving him a strong edge.


unless i'm misunderstanding, this part makes no sense. in this game (like BJ or any other shoe game), are the used cards not reshuffled after the shoe has been gone through? i've never seen used cards go immediately back into a shoe before being reshuffled.

I think they were saying the pattern on the back was asymmetrical. So by turning those cards 180* they would then be more noticeable the next time through regardless of the order (when they came along)...so even if they were shuffled they'd still be identifiable when face-down. Unless the shuffle was a total wash...
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
1,912
Tokens
I think they were saying the pattern on the back was asymmetrical. So by turning those cards 180* they would then be more noticeable the next time through regardless of the order (when they came along)...so even if they were shuffled they'd still be identifiable when face-down. Unless the shuffle was a total wash...

by a wash, do you mean that the reshuffle wouldn't realign all the cards back together on the same side?
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
by a wash, do you mean that the reshuffle wouldn't realign all the cards back together on the same side?

By wash I mean like when they break out all new decks and spread them all over the table every which way. I don't know whether or not a standard shuffle re-aligns them all into the same direction, but judging by what the article says apparently it does not...I'm no expert by any means that's just what I took from the article.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
1,912
Tokens
yeah, me neither.. it's really interesting to think about though. i couldn't imagine a dealer agreeing to rotate a player's winning cards.. it's almost unfathomable, regardless of him not touching them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,637
Messages
13,453,156
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com