Should The Broncos Sit Peyton Manning vs The Jaguars?

Search

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
[h=1]Broncos should rest Manning[/h][h=3]Loss to Jags unlikely; smart move is to avoid injury risk[/h]By Michael Bonzagni | ESPN Stats & Info
in.gif


It's no secret that Peyton Manning is having the best season of his career. He might end up with the best season of anyone's career. We all watched him drive up and down the field at AT&T Stadium on Sunday in one of the highest-scoring games in recent memory, posting a 93.7 Total QBR with 414 passing yards and four touchdowns. Amazingly, none of those were season highs. He is on pace to be the only quarterback since 2006 -- as far back as QBR data goes -- to have a rating over 90 for a season, not to mention shatter Tom Brady's single-season touchdown record and Drew Brees' passing record.


Manning might be the NFL's most important player to his team's chances to win the Lombardi Trophy. And that's exactly why John Fox should bench him Sunday against the Jacksonville Jaguars.

<OFFER></OFFER>

That's right. The Broncos should give Peyton an extra bye week.


There is no sense risking the health of the 37-year-old quarterback two years removed from multiple neck surgeries in one of the most lopsided matchups in NFL history. Sunday's game will mark only the sixth time that a team at 5-0 or better will face an opponent 0-5 or worse in the last 20 years. In all five previous matchups, the undefeated teams not only won, but covered the point spread in doing so.

The 0-5 Jaguars have been every bit as historically bad as Manning has been good this season. Jacksonville has been outscored by an average of 22.4 points per game, on pace for an NFL record. The offense has produced a putrid minus-17.5 expected points added per game, over a field goal worse than any other team since 2001. They're averaging 0.74 points per drive this year. In the last 13 seasons, none of the 414 NFL teams taking the field has produced at a worse rate.


Chad Henne will start in place of Blaine Gabbert, and Henne's QBR of 23.8 is a major improvement over Gabbert's 1.8 rating. But Henne's QBR is still worse than every other qualified passer in the league. The Broncos defense, which shut down the past two Super Bowl MVPs the first two weeks of the season, can easily control this offense.


Lost in Peyton's excellence this season has been the outstanding play of Denver's skill-position players. Of course, the success between the receivers and the QB are connected, but Denver's pass-catchers have been every bit as good after the completion as Manning has been before it. The Broncos' receivers and tight ends have 740 yards after the catch, over 200 yards more than any other team. Demaryius Thomas has an NFL-high 251 yards after the catch and Julius Thomas is averaging nearly 6 yards after each reception. Simply put, the scheme is conducive to subbing out Manning. Denver would not have to ask Brock Osweiler, Manning's presumed replacement for this game, to risk deeper throws because this offense doesn't rely on the deep ball. He'd just have to get the ball in the hands of Denver's playmakers on short throws and let them go to work.


And there's even less risk in a handoff. Denver rushers have averaged a mediocre 3.8 yards per rush this season, but considering they will be facing a Jaguars rush defense that has allowed nearly 5 yards per carry, the Broncos backs should be able to help shoulder the load in Peyton's absence for one week. Even when Jacksonville loads the box with additional defenders it likely won't matter: Through five games, the Jags have allowed 5.8 yards per rush when they crowd the line, worse than any team over the last two seasons. The Jags have allowed an NFL-high 39 rushing first downs, while Denver rushers have 36 first downs, tied with the 49ers for fifth most in the league.

And here's the clincher: Osweiler doesn't have to be Manning to beat the Jags. He doesn't even need to be average. We've already seen Terrelle Pryor top the Jags with a Total QBR of 18.2 in Week 2 -- the second-lowest QBR in a winning effort this season.


The worst-case scenario if they bench Manning would be a stunning loss to a non-division foe. The worst-case scenario should they not sit Manning? A stunning loss of a quarterback on a record-setting pace that would almost certainly torpedo Denver's postseason hopes. Why risk it, particularly given that one of the few things the Jaguars do half well is rush the quarterback?


Jags pass-rushers have only 10 sacks, but opposing signal-callers have been hit or put under duress on 20 percent of their dropbacks, tied for the 14th-best rate in the league. Is it that inconceivable that Jason Babin could get around one of Denver's inexperienced tackles one too many times? It's simply not worth taking the chance.


Denver is the favorite to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl this season, but all franchises have to consider the future. And in that process, the Broncos should consider their quarterback's injury history. Manning is 37 years old and missed the entire 2011 campaign after four neck surgeries. The Broncos should think long and hard about any opportunities to alleviate hits on their most important player.

Manning will surely be active and play Sunday, but simply letting him step on the field is a gamble the Broncos really don't need to take.
 

Where Taconite Is Just A Low Grade Ore
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
8,490
Tokens
Lots a luck w/that one. He won't even let the BU QB take a snap in practice.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Because if you sit manning......the denver broncos become the jags.

ok, maybe not.....but still a stupid idea....if it's a 4 or 5 td in 2nd half then im sure they will sit him
 

RX Local
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
24,032
Tokens
I wanted to read this and dont have insider. Thanks Hache :toast:

Would be funny due to the books and the spread if this happened


-murph
 

New member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
891
Tokens
Thats what you wonder from a betting aspect about this game.Seems like an easy cover for Denver.But what time and point will they pull manning?
They just came off a tough road win at Dallas.Next week there on the road against Indianapolis.I wonder how much effort Denver will actually put forth.
Could come in to this game with the attitude of lets stay healthy,get the win and get the hell out of here.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
6,106
Tokens
All the records on tap this season and Manning being Manning...I say after 4-5 TD passes and the game in hand he gets pulled (pulls himself, cause he's all class). Then he pushes the O coordinator out of the box and starts calling the plays! I hate the motherfucker!
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
This is just stupid. The odds of a QB who never runs getting badly hurt in a game is very very low. Against a horrible defense when he's likely to only play one half is even lower. Now I do wonder why he's been in games while up 30....
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
This is just stupid. The odds of a QB who never runs getting badly hurt in a game is very very low. Against a horrible defense when he's likely to only play one half is even lower. Now I do wonder why he's been in games while up 30....

Sure it got a few clicks though, hell Hache linked it here. Thats all that matters to the person that wrote it and ESPN
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
This is just stupid. The odds of a QB who never runs getting badly hurt in a game is very very low. Against a horrible defense when he's likely to only play one half is even lower. Now I do wonder why he's been in games while up 30....



You're right sean, but wasn't there a player within the last year or so who made big news getting injured in a game or end of game in which he had no business being in at the time??? Can't remember who it was...
 

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
2,604
Tokens
You're right sean, but wasn't there a player within the last year or so who made big news getting injured in a game or end of game in which he had no business being in at the time??? Can't remember who it was...
Mark Sanchez....oh wait, you said "big news"... @)
I think you're talking about Gronk, when he broke his forearm on one of NEs PATs while they were up a lot (iirc vs IND)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,223
Messages
13,449,675
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com