Nobody anywhere agrees with me on this.

Search

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
I think if you're down 15 and score, you go for 2. Everyone says oh, but if you miss, then you're down 9. Better to make it a one possession game. I disagree. If you are going to need two possessions, why wouldn't you want to know beforehand so you can apply proper strategy?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,209
Tokens
you answered it yourself your only down 1 possession so you can apply proper strategy
 

New member
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
9,756
Tokens
I think if you're down 15 and score, you go for 2. Everyone says oh, but if you miss, then you're down 9. Better to make it a one possession game. I disagree. If you are going to need two possessions, why wouldn't you want to know beforehand so you can apply proper strategy?

whats ur scenario? early in the game?...late in game u score u kick xtra pt, then go for 2 on game tying td...I had to edit cause my dumbass said go for 2 after the 1st td
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,764
Tokens
you keep your team emotionally motivated and you keep pressure on the other team

clock management by your opponent even becomes an issue, when they might actually pass as opposed to run run run to eat up clock

you wait until the last possession
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
32,987
Tokens
theoretically you have no better % of converting a 2 whether you're down 9 or down 2 after a TD so has more to do with time left on the clock and if you can really expect 2 more possessions which you'd need if you failed on the conversion down 9

i'd be annoyed if my coach went for 2 in the 4th quarter down 9 points but can see it both ways

obviously if there's 2 minutes left and you score to get down 9 it wouldn't be very intelligent to go for 2 and potentially end any chance of coming back. but if you do it with 12 minutes left it isn't completely moronic
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,237
Tokens
I think if you're down 15 and score, you go for 2. Everyone says oh, but if you miss, then you're down 9. Better to make it a one possession game. I disagree. If you are going to need two possessions, why wouldn't you want to know beforehand so you can apply proper strategy?
you are wrong,you go for 1 and make it a 1 possession game
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
I agree with you 100% Illini, I made a thread about this not too long ago.

If I'm going to miss the 2 I'd rather miss it upfront and know what I have to do than miss it at the very end of the game and lose.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
I agree completely. Have no clue why teams don't do that. I've always gone for two online in NCAA football on Xbox in that situation.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
I think if you're down 15 and score, you go for 2. Everyone says oh, but if you miss, then you're down 9. Better to make it a one possession game. I disagree. If you are going to need two possessions, why wouldn't you want to know beforehand so you can apply proper strategy?

I agree with this as well. Too many teams treat being down 8, as if they are down 7. Put game pressure on the opponent. Also, if you miss and are down 9, it makes the winning team even more conservative, which can work to your advantage.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,307
Tokens
Another vote for you are correct.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,307
Tokens
I agree with this as well. Too many teams treat being down 8, as if they are down 7. Put game pressure on the opponent. Also, if you miss and are down 9, it makes the winning team even more conservative, which can work to your advantage.

Finally something we can agree on
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
you answered it yourself your only down 1 possession so you can apply proper strategy
You are down by a TD and a 2 pointer, which is more like you are down a 2-team one possession parlay.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,307
Tokens
Here is the real reason which is indisputable.

Since the odds are identical for getting or not getting the 2 on the first or 2nd try.

The benefit of going for it early is information.
Its better to know before hand if you are down 1 score or 2 scores.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
9,756
Tokens
at what point in the game are u talking??? if you just scored down 15 with 1 minute left in lets say superbowl your telling me u kick xtra pt there?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,209
Tokens
so you miss and down 9 the other team scores and gets a 2 pt conversion now you need 3 possessions :ohno:
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
so you miss and down 9 the other team scores and gets a 2 pt conversion now you need 3 possessions :ohno:
Haha, wtf. No team is going for two up 15. And I think you're fucked either way if you give up another score late.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Here is the real reason which is indisputable.

Since the odds are identical for getting or not getting the 2 on the first or 2nd try.

The benefit of going for it early is information.
Its better to know before hand if you are down 1 score or 2 scores.
This is my logic 100%. If you need a two point conversion, why not try it the first time? That way if you miss, you at least know you missed and still have time on the clock. If you kick it and cut it to 8, then you play like you are down one possession and put everything on a conversion. You miss then, you lose. Why not find out the information as early as you can?
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Willy99 answered it in post #4. There's really no need to discuss it further. If you don't get the emotional and motivational angle of football you'll never be a successful capper. If I was a player (which I used to be) I would much rather be down one score than to know I have a bigger uphill battle to fight being down two scores. I've seen this same argument for years. And I've never understood why people even bring it up. There's a reason why coaches never waver from this method. And I've just given you the reason.
 

FreeRyanFerguson.com
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
13,308
Tokens
Willy99 answered it in post #4. There's really no need to discuss it further. If you don't get the emotional and motivational angle of football you'll never be a successful capper. If I was a player (which I used to be) I would much rather be down one score than to know I have a bigger uphill battle to fight being down two scores. I've seen this same argument for years. And I've never understood why people even bring it up. There's a reason why coaches never waver from this method. And I've just given you the reason.
You aren't down one score. You are down one score plus a 50% play at best. This would tend to keep a team from pushing on a last drive, since they're only down "one score." If they are down 9, they push and maybe get a shot with an onside kick. If you can't motivate your team to play regardless of the score, that's on you.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,625
Messages
13,453,038
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com