Bowl UNDER 1h system that was 62-7 last 2 years!!!

BLAK_MAMBA · Dec 11, 2013

Im back guys, im sure most of u remember this system from last year, hope we can make more coins this year.

Record last 2 bowl games:

2011 season: 32-2, +25.4 units
2012 season: 30-5, +13.5 units

Total last 2 bowls: 62-7, +38.9 units!!!*

Very simple system:
We play 1st half UNDER, if we win, we stop and on to the nxt game, if we lose that 1st half, we DOUBLE our bet on the UNDER 2nd half.

Thread from last year.

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=937902

Best of Luck to everyone!!

Shout out to BR, Kevy, action, varkeyboy, cappingmachine, barnzy, lewis, parga, and keynumber, much respect!!!

dabigdawg3 · Dec 11, 2013

SWEET.......Thanks BLAK_ MAMBA........LOVE THIS SYSTEM!!!

sendacash · Dec 11, 2013

Interesting, seems like the basic premise of this system is that bowl games tend to go under? This does appear to be the case especially the last two years as the under is 78-60 (56.5%) for the full game, although in 2010 the under was only 32-38. In general though, long term there does seems to be a bias towards the under in bowl games as they are 252-216 since year 2000.

Knightrofins · Dec 11, 2013

That was a lot of fun last year. Looking forward to doing this again!! Thank you

bookiereport · Dec 11, 2013

Very profitable system to follow in my opinion...thanks for posting

d3nv3r · Dec 11, 2013

thanks for the thread and gl

crazy results :103631605

HawkerJimbo73 · Dec 11, 2013

Nice work Mamba. I would be curious to see how this does during the regular season, or even NFL.

Aloha_4_Da_Winna · Dec 11, 2013

HawkerJimbo73 said:
Nice work Mamba. I would be curious to see how this does during the regular season, or even NFL.

The way the NFL is now a days, I say do the opposite. 1st half over, if doesn't hit, double on over 2H...

PistolWhip · Dec 11, 2013

The system results are a little misleading to me. If I understand it correctly, the 62-7 records actually means that you won 1U 62 times, but lost 2.31U 7 times. From that math, I get a +45.83. When you say double up, you would place a 2.1U wager on the under in the second half correct?

memphis · Dec 11, 2013

good too see u back bmack mambas cant wair to cssh in again this year

SilentKC · Dec 11, 2013

I remember Mamba from years past! And definitely remember this system! Can't wait to have some fun!

SilentKC · Dec 11, 2013

I also have notice when the under hits 1h, and public perception was on over. The 2h was still an unders play!

Murphy8276 · Dec 11, 2013

I like this system especially on marquee days with only one game .. gl this season guys :toast:

-murph

creelox · Dec 11, 2013

jdtpistolwhipua said:
The system results are a little misleading to me. If I understand it correctly, the 62-7 records actually means that you won 1U 62 times, but lost 2.31U 7 times. From that math, I get a +45.83. When you say double up, you would place a 2.1U wager on the under in the second half correct?

it actually means you lose 3.3ish units per loss (1.1 first half and 2.2 second half)...still a very profitable system none the less

loomis41973 · Dec 11, 2013

Played at a bill a unit last year...gonna double up this year.

Thank you!

k:

PistolWhip · Dec 11, 2013

Duh! Brain fart...

ofred · Dec 11, 2013

I also won a bit with this system last year. You've got to be available to place 2H bets, but these bowl games have long halves so that helps. Now, as for why it works…… 1st half: Some teams are a little rusty offensively, their timing is off? It does seem that some of the high scoring games during the regular season are toward mid-season or at the end- before the cold weather sets in. Maybe teams are fine tuned then? Maybe both coaches are playing a bit conservative 1st qtr? Players and coaches are thrown off their routines? All questions, not sure. Anyone else's thoughts are appreciated. 2nd half: Halftime adjustments? A team with a decent lead begins to run more? Once again, I'm not sure. But 62-7 over 2 years is pretty convincing, and it sure seems there is more correlation between it winning and the fact a bettor is playing an under for at least one half- unlike some systems which are ridiculous and have no correlation with success(for example- Hinky State is 15-3 ats on afternoon games, in October, when there is a full moon, with at least 7 points, but less than 10…..)

ofred · Dec 11, 2013

Also, since you lose 3.3 units per loss, the record could be reconfigured at 62-23.3 if you factor in the vig and the extra 2 units per loss. Still impressive.

loomis41973 · Dec 11, 2013

o fred said:
Also, since you lose 3.3 units per loss, the record could be reconfigured at 62-23.3 if you factor in the vig and the extra 2 units per loss. Still impressive.

Not gonna make you rich.....but been solid so far.

WinningWand · Dec 11, 2013

loomis41973 said:
Not gonna make you rich.....but been solid so far.

What if you escalated the bet each game?

So you start with 2500.00

Bet 100.00 first game. When you win you go to 150.00 for the next game. 200.00 next game. Each win escalates the bet 50.00. That might make you some money????

Bowl UNDER 1h system that was 62-7 last 2 years!!!

Member

Member

New member

Member

Member

New member

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

RX Local

New member

New member

Member

Member

Member

New member

New member

Forum statistics

Share this page