20 years Ago

Search

Member
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
31,627
Tokens
e95aa2f0-bb3c-11e3-b99b-c3718ef83ea3_nirvana_1.jpg


Originally published March 29, 2014 at 7:03 PM | Page modified March 30, 2014 at 9:01 AM

[h=1]Remembering Kurt Cobain and Nirvana: the band that defined Seattle[/h] The 20th anniversary of Kurt Cobain’s death draws near, on April 5. Five days later, Nirvana will be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. We asked Seattle locals, as well as cultural figures and younger musicians, to share their memories of Nirvana and its legacy.


PREV 1 of 2 NEXT


Alan Berner / The Seattle Times
Left by visitors at Viretta Park were images of Kurt Cobain and candles extinguished by Saturday’s rain. The park, at 151 Lake Washington Blvd. E., is next to the Seattle home where Nirvana’s lead singer and driving force had lived at the time of his suicide two decades ago.







With the death of Kurt Cobain 20 years ago — April 5, 1994 — Nirvana was finished. Since then, drummer Dave Grohl has gone on to further global success with his band Foo Fighters, and bassist Krist Novoselic has become an outspoken political activist for electoral reform. But the influence of the trio in rock music and beyond has only grown and changed in the intervening decades.
With Nirvana being inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame on April 10 with a ceremony in New York City, we reached out to locals who were around for the ascent, as well as cultural figures and younger musicians. They shared their memories and views of the effect the band had on people at the time, its legacy in the music community and the way Nirvana helped shape the identity of Seattle.
Here is what some of them had to say.
I remember the first time we heard “Nevermind” at the Rocket. Designer Dennis White comes waltzing in. He had this cassette. He said, ‘I’ve got Soundgarden’s new record.’ ” “Nevermind” and “Badmotorfinger” were both supposed to be released at the same time. We said, “Let’s listen to ‘Badmotorfinger.’ ” We said, “That’s a great record.” Then somebody flipped the tape over. “That’s really ... good. That’s Nirvana? Play that again.” We played the tape about 30 or 40 times, all day.
It was one of those breathtaking moments, an epiphany, the skies parted. Kurt was able to reach inside himself and grab those universal ideas and express them in such an emotive way it just gotcha! Pop just doesn’t get better than that.

— Art Chantry, graphic designer of the Rocket magazine, and who made many of the early grunge-rock posters, which were featured in a one-man show at the Seattle Art Museum
All I knew, sitting next to my then-boyfriend Jack Endino, listening to this band that he had just recorded — a group of Aberdeen guys said to be “friends of the Melvins” — was that Nirvana was yet another cool Seattle band and this Kurt Cobain guy was one tortured mofo.
We never thought any of this would happen. I was putting out a local magazine called Backlash and covering all sorts of awesome local bands — Soundgarden, Mudhoney, Mother Love Bone, Tad, and of course the Melvins. Jack was making 12 bucks an hour recording some of these bands at a little studio in Ballard.
It was magical, all the amazing rock being recorded in the late ’80s, though nobody outside of Seattle knew about it and damn few people inside Seattle had ever heard of it, either. Back then the idea of major record label execs slithering into our city signing up every band they could find was about as likely as Elvis showing up at my doorstep with a bushel of Percocet.
Those were special days, before the word “grunge” was widely used to describe the brain-rattling heavy riff rock slowly seeping into the Central Tavern, the Vogue and Squid Row on weeknights. I knew Nirvana was a great band, of course. In a town reputed to be heavy on riffs and light on songs, Cobain’s melodies were strong, his guitar lines artful and his agony real.
But how was I to know this band was to become the “voice of a generation”? As usual, I didn’t.

— Dawn Anderson, editor of Backlash magazine
I probably saw that band eight to 10 times. I don’t think anyone would ever have guessed that this was going to be this huge international pop phenomenon. They were playing for 100-150 people on a good night. When [Fantagraphics] had that Sub Pop panel discussion, [Sub Pop Records co-founder] Bruce Pavitt was on the panel and one of the audience members asked him what band made it that surprised you. He didn’t hesitate. He said Nirvana.
My fondest memories are when they were playing at the Vogue, the OK Hotel, CoCA. I think they were better in a small club. The first time I ever saw them at a big arena was at the Coliseum. ... I saw Kurt afterward. He said something like ‘I don’t know what to do with myself.’ The intimacy of the lyrics, of the music, didn’t literally translate that well to big arenas. It was hard to command the stage.
I remember seeing Nirvana play one time at the Crocodile, and Mudhoney was playing. That’s one of the only times I remember seeing Kurt be really happy. There was a big smile on his face. He did some stage diving and he was crowd surfing — and that was after he gained all that notoriety.

— Larry Reid, curator for the Fantagraphics bookstore and gallery in Georgetown. He was the executive director of the Center on Contemporary Art when he presented Nirvana there in 1989.
Nirvana had just played a sellout show at the Coliseum. Now, I was part of a lucky crowd of a few hundred who crammed themselves into the Crocodile for a private show, to see a band we’d been sure would never play such an intimate venue again. There was little of the moshing and slam dancing that usually accompanied Nirvana’s shows. We were all a bit awe-struck.
There were songs from the band’s first demo, songs that later appeared on “In Utero,” and barely anything from the multimillion-selling “Nevermind.” It was a terrific show. Nirvana wasn’t the “biggest group in the world” that night; they were a local band once again, thrilling a packed house like they used to do before the rest of the world caught on.

— Gillian Gaar, author of “Entertain Us: The Rise of Nirvana”
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
2,944
Tokens
There is no reason this band belongs in the Rock and Roll HOF. Cobains death is the best thing to happen to them (as shitty as that sounds).
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,108
Tokens
There is no reason this band belongs in the Rock and Roll HOF. Cobains death is the best thing to happen to them (as shitty as that sounds).


Hey Nick,

I don't know for sure about what you said, but..... I can boldly guarantee this shit has not place in a sports forum. (Not aimed at you Nick) "Good talk Russ".
 

Member
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
31,627
Tokens
music. tv, movies, sex, thats what this forum is for.
if you can get a thread going about sports gambling go for it
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,497
Tokens
Well deserved HOF.. Back in the early 90's this band with the classic album" Nevermind " changed everything in the music industry.. How many bands had that kind of impact ? One of the worst days of my life when Kurt committed suicide... There music still sounds great and fresh to this day
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
9,460
Tokens
Based on 3 albums? The were at the right place at the right time, not on the same level as the all time greats

Is not quantity, is quality, and they really have at least 5 or 6 albums total with their non official LP releases, songs as good as the "popular ones". To discredit a band for how much albums they made is like discrediting the Rolling Stones for putting tons of records and not a really outstanding one for the last 30 years.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
2,944
Tokens
They got better right after he blew he brains out because the stress got too much. That episode made them all millions, totally overrated band
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,497
Tokens
They got better right after he blew he brains out because the stress got too much. That episode made them all millions, totally overrated band

WTF are you talking about ? The band disbanded after his death...Your overrated with these kinds of posts
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
2,944
Tokens
There isnt much difference between Nirvana and Guns N Roses, except Axl Rose stuck around and showed they were a flash in the pan. The hype was pretty much the same for both bands. How does anyone know that Nirvana wouldnt have had the same failures as Guns N Roses if he lived. To put them in the same category as Elvis, Led Zepplin, The Beatles, etc is a joke.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,497
Tokens
There isnt much difference between Nirvana and Guns N Roses, except Axl Rose stuck around and showed they were a flash in the pan. The hype was pretty much the same for both bands. How does anyone know that Nirvana wouldnt have had the same failures as Guns N Roses if he lived. To put them in the same category as Elvis, Led Zepplin, The Beatles, etc is a joke.

well fortunately for all of us, the HOF speaks louder then you..in other words your opinion doesn't matter on this subject in the scheme of things
 

The Dude Abides
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,088
Tokens
well fortunately for all of us, the HOF speaks louder then you..in other words your opinion doesn't matter on this subject in the scheme of things

No offense but the Rock N Roll hall of fame is a joke.. Not arguing about Nirvana, But not to have the Moody Blues,Deep Purple or Yes, in is a complete Joke, especially since they put in a lot of other jokers............
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,586
Messages
13,452,606
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com