Pacers/Heat & Spurs/Thunder Series Prices

Search
HacheMan

HacheMan

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,168
Tokens
5dimes

<SMALL>Miami Heat vs Indiana Pacers - Eastern Conference Final - Series Price - Best of Seven</SMALL>
Sun 5/18 881 Miami Heat (Series)<INPUT id=editx size=4 name=M1_20> -370
3:30PM 882 Indiana Pacers (Series) <INPUT id=editx size=4 name=M2_20> +310

<TBODY>
</TBODY>

<SMALL>Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs - Western Conference Final - Series Price - Best of Seven</SMALL>
Mon 5/19 883 Oklahoma City Thunder (Series)<INPUT id=editx size=4 name=M1_22> +180
8:00PM 884 San Antonio Spurs (Series) <INPUT id=editx size=4 name=M2_22> -220

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
 
HacheMan

HacheMan

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,168
Tokens
+310 would be great value on the Pacers if any of us could predict that they suddenly turn back into the team we saw 3/4 of the NBA season...
 
Vlad the Impaler

Vlad the Impaler

Banned
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
6,813
Tokens
Hopefully the Pacers can win as the NBA makes its best effort to not act like it is fixed. All it comes down to is who gets the 50/50 calls in key times.
 

bigtendominator

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
There is NO Fucking Chance the NBA has Indiana playing OKC/SA in the finals. They aren't taking 2 of the smaller TV markets and putting them in the finals. Also, built in story line for 2014-15, can LBJ do what MJ never did, win 4 in a row.
 

bigtendominator

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
List of NBA Teams and Regular Season Records by Market Size
<STYLE type=text/css>.nobrtable br ** display: none }</STYLE>

#
Market
# of TV Homes
Teams
Record (as of Mar. 9)

  1. 1
New York

  1. 7.515M
Knicks

  1. 34-29
Nets

  1. 20-43

  1. 2
Los Angeles

  1. 5.667M
Lakers

  1. 46-19
Clippers

  1. 25-40

  1. 3
Chicago

  1. 3.503M
Bulls

  1. 45-18

  1. 4
Philadelphia

  1. 3.016M
Sixers

  1. 33-31

  1. 5
Dallas-Ft. Worth

  1. 2.595M
Mavericks

  1. 46-18

  1. 6
SF/Oak/SJ

  1. 2.524M
Warriors

  1. 28-36

  1. 7
Boston

  1. 2.460M
Celtics

  1. 46-18

  1. 8
Atlanta

  1. 2.407M
Hawks

  1. 37-27

  1. 9
Washington, DC

  1. 2.390M
Wizards

  1. 16-47

  1. 10
Houston

  1. 2.177M
Rockets

  1. 33-33

  1. 11
Detroit

  1. 1.884M
Pistons

  1. 23-42

  1. 12
Phoenix

  1. 1.881M
Suns

  1. 33-29

  1. 15
Minneapolis-St. Paul

  1. 1.754M
Timberwolves

  1. 16-50

  1. 16
Miami-Ft. Lauderdale

  1. 1.581M
Heat

  1. 43-21

  1. 17
Denver

  1. 1.573M
Nuggets

  1. 37-27

  1. 18
Cleveland-Akron

  1. 1.526M
Cavaliers

  1. 12-52

  1. 19
Orlando-Daytona

  1. 1.453M
Magic

  1. 41-24

  1. 20
Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto

  1. 1.409M
Kings

  1. 15-47

  1. 22
Portland

  1. 1.198M
Trail Blazers

  1. 37-27

  1. 23
Charlotte

  1. 1.166M
Bobcats

  1. 26-38

  1. 27
Indianapolis

  1. 1.106M
Pacers

  1. 27-37

  1. 32
Salt Lake City

  1. 954K
Jazz

  1. 34-31

  1. 35
Milwaukee

  1. 901K
Bucks

  1. 25-38

  1. 37
San Antonio

  1. 845K
Spurs

  1. 52-12

  1. 45
Oklahoma City

  1. 705K
Thunder

  1. 40-23

  1. 48
Memphis

  1. 694K
Grizzlies

  1. 36-30

  1. 52
New Orleans

  1. 636K
Hornets

  1. 38-29

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
 
HarryCaray

HarryCaray

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
bigtendominator said:
There is NO Fucking Chance the NBA has Indiana playing OKC/SA in the finals. They aren't taking 2 of the smaller TV markets and putting them in the finals. Also, built in story line for 2014-15, can LBJ do what MJ never did, win 4 in a row.
Click to expand...

One could argue that long-term the Heat losing, and all the hooplah and coverage it would create, is better for the league. If you wanna go the angle of "bet on what makes more sense for the NBA", which I don't put much stock in personally.
 
doubledeuce22

doubledeuce22

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
8,229
Tokens
HarryCaray said:
One could argue that long-term the Heat losing, and all the hooplah and coverage it would create, is better for the league. If you wanna go the angle of "bet on what makes more sense for the NBA", which I don't put much stock in personally.
Click to expand...

Guess you haven't been paying attention for the last 20 years.
 
doubledeuce22

doubledeuce22

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
8,229
Tokens
I hate the word value, but assuming the pacers are worth a damn with having home court, I could see some serious plus money scenarios later on holding a pacers +300 ticket.
 
gtc08

gtc08

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
the nba doesnt need major markets to get good ratings anymore. look at the ratings history compared to the world series. nba is moving up, mlb is on the way down. the younger demo trends basketball and football and will watch regardless.
 
HacheMan

HacheMan

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,168
Tokens
gtc08 said:
the nba doesnt need major markets to get good ratings anymore. look at the ratings history compared to the world series. nba is moving up, mlb is on the way down. the younger demo trends basketball and football and will watch regardless.
Click to expand...



Can't disagree with this... MLB blows
 

PatsFan1283

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
I can't remember a team being over +300 with HCA in a 7 game series.

I even looked this up and the only one that was close was Minnesota vs LAL in '03 after the Lakers had won 3 titles (if anyone has any others feel free to chime in, historical odds on series prices not available)

Pacers got some matchups in their favor, it'll atleast be a competitive series I think.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,514
Messages
13,452,087
Members
99,417
Latest member
selectionpartners

Share this page

The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com
@2023 TheRX. All rights reserved.21+. Bet Responsibly: If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, seek help at 1-800-Gambler